Finch Towers

Pros

• Some parts of the apartment building are great.
• New management is trying to get the place in shape.
• The building has brand-new windows.
• New apartments are being renovated immediately after tenants move out.

Cons

• The building was filthy.
• The walls were not repainted, making the unit unattractive.
• The carpets are an eyesore.
• The unit never received renovations during the tenant's occupancy.
• The overall housing experience is described as the worst.
• The property is infested with bed bugs and smells horrible.
• The exterior is a mess with a broken bench and exposed wood, and it reeked of garbage.
• A tenant urinated in the elevator, indicating severe maintenance and cleanliness issues.
• Despite new management, the property still receives a low rating.

Review

Residents express a wide range of frustrations about this historic building, mixing bitterness over long-standing neglect with hints of improvement under new management. The most common thread is a sense that the place is aging far beyond its care, with the interior showing serious wear in many units even as some newer sections receive upgrades. One renter, who has called this home for seven years, describes a unit and a building that have not kept pace with time: walls that haven't been repainted, carpets that are an eyesore, and a general lack of renovations that leaves them feeling overlooked. Their rating sits at three stars, a compromise born from the mix of dismay and occasional observations of potential improvement. They point out that some parts of the building are "great," yet their own apartment and others like it remain stagnant, creating a sense of unfairness and frustration.

The contrast between renovated and non-renovated spaces is a recurring theme. While some apartments are being refreshed, the same opportunities aren't extended to those who have already lived there for years. The wording makes it clear that new tenants are seeing a much different experience: immediate renovations after a tenant leaves, with no carpets to contend with, hardwood floors instead, painted walls, and brand-new windows. The reviewer suggests these upgrades are exactly what they should have had from the start, framing the situation as one where time and resources are being allocated unevenly. The implication is that the system rewards new arrivals while long-term residents feel stranded, unable to move to a more upgraded unit because there's nowhere nearby to relocate their furniture temporarily.

Several reviews paint a bleaker overall picture, with stronger language about the management and the living conditions. A particularly harsh assessment proclaims this as "the worst housing experience I have ever witnessed," with the writer vowing to contact higher authorities at HUD about the management's behavior. There's also a note about confusion surrounding the property's online presence: while searching for the office of ICS (Int. Correspondence School) in Scranton, PA on Google Maps, the reviewer can't shake the sense that the building keeps appearing in search results for a different purpose or organization. The combined effect is a sense that the building's identity and reputation are muddled, and that residents feel they are stuck dealing with a management team that may not be fully responsive or transparent.

Another reviewer emphasizes the practical side of the deterioration, calling the building "filthy" and acknowledging that new management is taking steps to restore it, but still rating the place as a one-star experience for the moment. The shift in rating - from a prior average to a much lower score as conditions persist - reflects a transition period where improvements are acknowledged but not yet realized on the ground for many tenants. The sentiment is clear: some cleanup and changes are underway, but they aren't enough to overcome the baseline disappointment and the ongoing issues that contribute to a sense of neglect.

One of the most vivid and alarming parts of the collection of impressions is a particularly extreme account of a pest problem. The reviewer describes bed bugs and other unsanitary conditions in the strongest possible terms: "Never go here! It's bed bug city!!! Disgusting, smelled horrible, I was inside for 5 minutes and a tenant pissed himself on the elevator! I was also covered in bed bug bites that are still visible." They paint a scene of uncleanliness and physical distress, mentioning a broken bench outside, piles of wood, and a pervasive odor of garbage. The tone is unequivocally negative and serves as a stark counterpoint to any notes of potential improvement elsewhere in the building, underscoring the severity of some residents' experiences.

In the end, the mix of reviews reads like a portrait of a property in transition - historic, with some parts showing age and neglect and others undergoing renewal under newer management. The emotional cadence moves from frustration and resignation to cautious hope, but the overall sentiment remains firmly skeptical: without consistent updates to the older units, reliable pest control and cleanliness, timely maintenance, and transparent communication about renovations and tenant relocation, the complaints are likely to persist. The diverse voices share a common demand: that improvements be equitable, that long-term residents aren't left waiting while newer ones reap the benefits, and that basic quality of life issues - cleanliness, safety, and comfort - be addressed with real, sustained action.

This part of Scranton, Pennsylvania is a bustling area with convenient access to various amenities that may appeal to seniors looking for a lively and active community. With hospitals and skilled nursing facilities within close proximity, residents can feel secure knowing that healthcare services are easily accessible. Numerous dining options, ranging from seafood to cafes, offer a diverse culinary scene for those who enjoy dining out. Additionally, there are several pharmacies nearby for convenient access to medications and health supplies. The area also has parks for leisurely walks and outdoor activities, as well as places of worship for spiritual fulfillment. Overall, this neighborhood provides a mix of healthcare services, recreational activities, and cultural offerings that may cater to the needs and preferences of seniors considering senior living in the area.

Hospitals

• Regional Hospital Surgery Center (0.1 miles)
• Spirit of Mercy Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation (0.4 miles)
• Scranton Hospital Company (0.4 miles)
• Regional Hospital of Scranton (0.4 miles)
• Mercy Hospital Wound Care (0.5 miles)
• Moses Taylor Hospital (0.5 miles)
• Geisinger Community Medical Center (1.1 miles)

Restaurants

• Osaka Restaurant (0.2 miles)
• Cooper's Seafood House (0.3 miles)
• Downtown Deli (0.3 miles)
• Bar Pazzo (0.3 miles)
• Bartari (0.4 miles)
• Taco Bell (0.4 miles)
• Trax (0.4 miles)

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (0.3 miles)
• Rite Aid (0.8 miles)
• The Medicine Shoppe Scranton (0.9 miles)
• Omnicare Pharmacy (1.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.2 miles)
• Walgreens (1.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.4 miles)

Cafes

• Northern Light Espresso Bar (0.3 miles)
• Starbucks (0.4 miles)
• Carmen's At The Radisson Lackawanna Station (0.4 miles)
• Mansour's Grocery & Coffee (1 miles)
• Zummo's Cafe (1.1 miles)
• Panera Bread (3.4 miles)
• Starbucks (3.4 miles)

Physicians

• Thomas Dzwonczyk M.D., FACC (0.4 miles)
• Akash D. Agarwal, MD (0.4 miles)
• John Anthony Kutz, MD (0.4 miles)
• Great Valley Cardiology (0.4 miles)
• Professional Orthopaedic Associates (0.4 miles)
• Joseph Patrick Bannon (0.4 miles)
• W David Fitzpatrick, MD, FACC (0.4 miles)

Parks

• Steamtown National Historic Site (0.4 miles)
• McDade Park (2.4 miles)
• Sherwood Park (2.5 miles)

Places of Worship

• Saint Stanislaus Pncc-Church (1.3 miles)
• St Ann's Monastery Parish (1.6 miles)

Theaters

• Cinemark (3.7 miles)