ACS Christian Manor

Pros

• The place is described as a great place to live.
• It is called amazing by a reviewer.
• A reviewer had great initial expectations about living there.
• A reviewer indicated they planned to stay for about two years, signaling satisfaction.

Cons

• The place is deplorable and smelly.
• The review claims the resident's father became emaciated and is on a long recovery journey after staying there with new staff and a new location.
• The facility allegedly stole from him.
• The staff meddled with and bothered residents, entering private rooms despite requests not to, and there was no security.
• A laptop went missing and residents with dementia were harassed.
• The staff pounded on doors and harassed the reviewer, including giving a middle finger.
• The place is described as disgusting with bed bugs, and employees including the owner are alleged to be drug addicts, drunks, and pill poppers.

Review

The collection of impressions about this place reads like a rollercoaster of experiences, with voices ranging from deeply disappointed to surprisingly optimistic. One set of remarks paints a stark, almost chaotic picture: the environment is described as deplorable and smelly, and the people involved are accused of letting a vulnerable family member suffer. The reviewer recounts a visit tied to gathering a loved one's belongings for delivery to him during a difficult recovery. The person claims that the resident - described as emaciated and on a long road to recovery - was supported by "new staff, new place, and family," yet theft occurred during the process. In this account, the emotional weight is heavy: belongings were allegedly stolen, and the author emphasizes a sense of moral injury from witnessing what they perceived as neglect, all while trying to reset the course with words like "it's ok we can start from today and move forward everything will be better."

Interwoven with that distress is a contrasting, seemingly sincere optimism from another voice: "Great place to live I will be there 2 years soon." This line suggests that for at least one resident or family member, the experience is framed in a much more positive light, and plans to stay indicate a belief in stability, routine, or care that supports a long-term residence. The juxtaposition of such starkly different views underscores a central tension about the place: for some, it represents a sanctuary or a viable home; for others, it fails to meet basic expectations of safety, cleanliness, and respect.

The narrative offered by a resident's family member adds a level of alarm and personal intrusion that few would accept. What begins as a hopeful expectation - "my husband Nicholas moving in a year and a half ago" - soon slides into a troubling account of meddling and privacy violations. The family member says staff intruded repeatedly, even after requests not to enter "MY ROOM," and the situation is described as complicated by missing items, including a laptop. The claim that residents with dementia harassed the narrator, coupled with a confrontation marked by a middle finger and banging on doors, paints a picture of a place where security and boundaries feel permeable at best. The closing cry - "please don't send Mom there" - is a strong caution directed at prospective caregivers and families considering placement, signaling a highly negative perception rooted in personal safety concerns and disrespectful interactions.

Among the clearly negative notes, there is also a brief, almost casual positive signal: "?Amazing." It's a reminder that experiences can be uneven and that some individuals may find elements of the facility that meet their expectations, even amid broader dissatisfaction. The brevity of this comment stands in contrast to the longer, more dire critiques and suggests that at least some aspects could be satisfactory to certain residents or visitors, though the context remains ambiguous.

A final, unequivocal indictment closes the collection: the place is described as disgusting, plagued by bed bugs, and staffed by individuals accused of criminal and addictive behaviors. The claim that the employees - including the owner - are drug addicts and drink heavily frames the environment as unsafe and unreliable. The speaker leaves no room for ambiguity, calling the facility a "hole in the wall" and explicitly stating they would never recommend it. The intensity of this verdict caps a sequence of alarming assertions - hygiene problems, pervasive substance abuse among staff, and a general sense of instability - that many readers would find deeply troubling if true.

Taken together, these reviews present a spectrum of experiences that seems to hinge on personal interactions, time, and perhaps specific shifts or conditions within the facility. The more troubling entries emphasize safety, privacy, housekeeping, and staff conduct, casting doubt on the reliability of care and the overall environment. In contrast, a minority voice offers an invitation to view the place more charitably, hinting at genuine potential for some residents to feel at home there. The conflicting tones make it clear that potential residents and their families should approach with thorough due diligence: visit in person, speak with current residents and families, review latest inspection or complaint records, and assess whether the level of care, security, and resident respect aligns with their needs and expectations. The strongest theme across the narratives is caution - both from those who warn against placing loved ones here and from those who acknowledge that parts of the experience might work for some - but the negative accounts dominate the conversation, urging careful consideration before making a decision.

The Pittston area offers a variety of amenities and services that may appeal to seniors looking for a comfortable and convenient living environment. With a selection of restaurants offering diverse dining options, pharmacies for easy access to medication, and medical facilities such as Bucci Laser Vision and Geisinger Hospital nearby, residents can rest assured that their healthcare needs are taken care of. Places of worship like St Maria Goretti Church provide spiritual support, while cafes like Bistro On Hudson offer a cozy spot for socializing with friends. Additionally, the presence of parks like Luzerne County Recreational Complex and Frances Slocum State Park provide opportunities for outdoor recreation and relaxation. Overall, this part of Pittston strikes a balance between urban convenience and natural beauty, making it an attractive option for senior living.

Restaurants

• Valenti's Restaurant (0.8 miles)
• Susquehanna Brewing Company (0.8 miles)
• Tomato Bar and Bistro (0.9 miles)
• Agolino's Char-Grill Restaurant (1 miles)
• Ballyhoo (1.1 miles)
• Blue Ribbon Farm Dairy (1.6 miles)
• Pittston Diner (1.7 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.8 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.8 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.5 miles)
• Discount Med Direct (2.7 miles)
• Llewellyn's Medical Supply (3.7 miles)

Physicians

• Bucci Laser Vision (1 miles)
• Allied Services John Heinz (1.2 miles)
• Pittston Medical Center (1.3 miles)
• Polit & Costello Dentistry (1.8 miles)
• Coordinated Health (1.9 miles)
• Renal Consultants-Wyoming Valley (2.1 miles)
• Dr Scalzo's Office (3 miles)

Places of Worship

• St Maria Goretti Church (1.8 miles)
• Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Wyoming Valley (4.9 miles)
• Luzerne United Methodist Church (5 miles)

Cafes

• Bistro On Hudson (3.2 miles)
• Picc's Ice Cream (5 miles)
• Panera Bread (5.4 miles)

Parks

• Luzerne County Recreational Complex (3.5 miles)
• Frances Slocum State Park (4.7 miles)

Hospitals

• Geisinger East entrance (4 miles)
• Janet Weis Children's Hospital At Geisinger Wyoming Valley (4 miles)
• Geisinger Hospital (4.1 miles)
• Geisinger Health System (4.2 miles)
• VA Medical Center (4.8 miles)
• General Hospital (5 miles)
• Center For Same Day Surgery (5.1 miles)