The Estates At Lynnhurst in Saint Paul, MN

Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby

• About the same

  Episcopal Church Home Gardens

  4.4 from 9 reviews

  $5,400 / month

  0.1 miles away
• from -$1035 / mo

  Jbs Homes

  5 from 4 reviews

  $4,500 / month

  17.5 miles away
• from -$535 / mo

  Pine Ridge Assisted Living

  3.8 from 4 reviews

  $5,000 / month

  21.6 miles away
• from -$535 / mo

  Metro Nursing Services

   

  $5,000 to $7,500 / month

  7.5 miles away

Pros

• The staff and administration are described as friendly and caring.
• One reviewer credits the facility with compassionate, nonjudgmental care for residents.
• The rest of the staff and management are noted as awesome and highly recommended.
• Brenna is described as caring and is praised for her dedication.
• A reviewer expresses gratitude to the staff for their work.

Cons

• They describe the facility as disgusting, filthy, and unsanitary, with mold and sticky floors.
• They claim the staff are rude, unresponsive, and fail to provide basic care (not feeding, not showering, leaving residents on the floor).
• They allege residents are dumped at hospitals or moved elsewhere to “get rid of the problem,” implying unsafe practices.
• They accuse the facility of using patients’ images to promote influencer marketing without consent, raising privacy and ethical concerns.
• They insist the place should be shut down and investigated by the health department.
• They report chronic communication failures, with phones unanswered and staff distracted, making it hard to reach someone about a loved one.

Review

The Estates at Lynnhurst is where families should recognize they may be making a cautious, high-need choice. This community is best suited for a situation in which a loved one must be placed quickly and the family is prepared to supervise care closely, advocate relentlessly, and tolerate the reality of inconsistent staffing and variable conditions. In practical terms, it serves best those who can live with the certainty that care quality will hinge on individual staff members showing up, rather than a consistently reliable system of care. For anyone pursuing a straightforward, predictable quality of life with regular, attentive oversight, this is not the first option to consider.

Those weighing alternatives should look seriously at other Twin Cities options with stronger staffing patterns, clearer accountability, and demonstrably cleaner environments. If a smooth intake, transparent communication, and dependable daily routines matter, whether for memory care, skilled nursing transitions, or long-term assisted living, this community should not be the default choice. Families should reserve this site for emergency placement only, or as a last resort when all other vetted facilities have been ruled out and a contingency plan requires immediate occupancy. In short, there are better-mappable paths for those prioritizing consistent care, cleanliness, and proactive management.

On the upside, a handful of staff members and the leadership team have shown real warmth and professional care when present. One caregiver labeled as Brenna is cited as particularly caring, and a few reviewers describe administrators and some frontline staff as genuinely compassionate. These moments matter and prove that the potential for humane, respectful interaction exists within the building. When the staff roster includes people who approach residents with courtesy and patience, it demonstrates what this place could be, had consistent staffing and robust oversight been in place. That limited positivity is real, but it is not a guarantee of everyday safety or quality.

The dominant pattern across the feedback is troubling. Repeated reports describe under-staffing, slow response times, and insufficient attention to daily needs such as feeding, bathing, and personal care. There are alarming accounts of residents being left unattended, unshowered for weeks, or found in distress, with calls for help going unanswered for extended periods. Facilities far exceed basic cleanliness expectations, beds not made properly, rooms with persistent odors, stained surfaces, and malfunctioning equipment. Instances of miscommunication or lack of transparency from administration compound the risk, leaving families feeling shut out and fearful about what happens when no visitors are present. A troubling thread runs through the reviews: care gaps that are not isolated incidents, but part of an ongoing pattern.

The contrast between occasional compassion and the daily grind of neglect is sharp. Pros offsetting factors do not come close to balancing the broader risk profile. When the same person or family experiences both moments of kind, attentive care and long stretches of disengagement or neglect, the net effect is instability and unease. The most serious red flags, overmedication, hospitalizations tied to care lapses, patients found on the floor or in distress, and accusations of mismanaged or hidden finances, signal systemic issues that undermine trust and safety. Privacy concerns around photographing patients for promotional content further erode confidence, reminding families that ethical lapses can accompany quality-of-life failures.

For families moving forward, concrete steps can help separate choice from chance. Request to review the most recent state or health department inspections, and ask for direct access to the administrator or director of nursing. Insist on meeting front-line caregivers on the shift when a loved one would be cared for, and obtain a clear, written care plan with measurable goals. Probe the admissions criteria, discharge planning, and the facility’s policies on staff-to-resident ratios, medication administration, and incident reporting. If choosing this community, require a structured escalation path for concerns, daily updates, and guaranteed timely responses. Above all, visit with a careful, staged approach, preferably with a trusted family member present, to observe staff interactions, cleanliness, and the overall environment over a full day.

In the end, The Estates at Lynnhurst does not present as a dependable, high-quality option for most families seeking long-term assisted living or memory care. The overwhelming weight of the reviews suggests a facility that struggles with staffing, hygiene, and consistent care delivery, with serious safety and communication gaps that can jeopardize a resident’s well-being. Only consider this community if a family is prepared to engage in rigorous oversight, demand continuous accountability, and accept substantial risk as part of the placement. For those who value steadier staffing, cleaner environments, and transparent leadership, exploring other facilities first will yield a more predictable and safer path for a loved one’s daily life.