Episcopal Church Home Of Minnesota

Pros

• The professional staff at Episcopal Church Home provided excellent care to residents, demonstrating their commitment to quality service during rehabilitation.
• Patients in transitional care were well taken care of, with caregivers assigned to each individual, ensuring personalized attention and support.
• The facility was clean and well-kept, contributing to a pleasant living environment for both residents and visitors.
• The variety of activities offered at Episcopal Homes, along with its beautiful setting and amenities, made it an attractive option for potential residents.
• Staff members were described as nice and receptive, enhancing the overall experience for families visiting their loved ones.
• The food served at the facility received positive feedback from residents, indicating a focus on nutrition and meal quality.
• The head nurse's welcoming attitude during tours reflected the facility's dedication to transparency and communication with families.
• Residents appreciated the homely feel of their rooms, which helped create a comforting atmosphere in the facility.

Cons

• The facility has numerous CNAs who are refusing to get vaccinated, leading to a situation where family members cannot visit their loved ones due to quarantine measures.
• The administration seems unable or unwilling to enforce vaccination requirements, putting residents at risk.
• Communication issues arise when calling the facility, as some staff members do not seem to understand English well and fail to provide necessary information.
• There were instances of unreturned calls from the admissions staff, indicating a lack of professionalism and attention from upper management.
• While the facility may be visually appealing, there are concerns about the quality of care given that vulnerable residents might not receive adequate attention if administrative issues persist.
• Despite being a nice facility with good care, there's disappointment regarding the long waiting list for admission, causing families to seek other options.

Review

The ongoing challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to significant concerns among families regarding the health and safety protocols in assisted living facilities. One family, grappling with the quarantine of their loved one due to staff members—specifically Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)—refusing vaccination, expressed sorrow over being unable to visit. They voiced frustration at the apparent inability or unwillingness of facility administration to enforce vaccination mandates, ultimately questioning how these workers can justify their choices while caring for one of society's most vulnerable populations. Their loved one remains in isolation, highlighting how personal decisions can impact residents' quality of life during a public health crisis.

The family's experience reflects broader sentiments about the importance of consideration for both staff and residents during the pandemic. While they acknowledged that their family member had previously received excellent transitory care at Episcopal Church Home—an organization known for its diverse senior services such as memory care and assisted living—they felt compelled to explore alternatives that better suited their loved one's preferences. Their decision not to push for admission into Episcopal Homes stemmed from its location and size; they believed a smaller setting would be more comforting for her.

The family described Episcopal Homes as extensive and engaging, noting that it housed various amenities including coffee shops and swimming pools alongside vibrant activities tailored for seniors. Their mother’s brief stay there allowed them to witness firsthand the compassionate nature of professional staff involved in rehabilitation services such as physical therapy and occupational therapy, which they found exemplary. However, they also encountered communication difficulties when trying to connect with administrative personnel who were not always fluent in English; this barrier sometimes hindered effective exchanges regarding scheduling or medical updates.

Despite these minor grievances, their overall impression of care during rehabilitation remained positive. They reported satisfactory dining conditions—food that was well prepared if not entirely exceptional—and characterized the environment as congenial. Unfortunately, throughout her time at Episcopal Homes, she was isolated due to quarantine practices that are currently standard procedure within transitory care settings—a reality many facilities have adopted as a safety measure amid ongoing health concerns.

The admissions aspect raised concern among family members who observed inconsistent follow-through regarding inquiries about available spots within the facility. Repeated promises from admissions personnel went unfulfilled, leading them to question how much oversight management provided regarding operational efficiency and resident treatment standards. If prospective residents cannot receive timely responses about admissions procedures when spots are open, it casts doubt on broader resident care quality.

In contrast with their experiences at Episcopal Church Home—a place deemed plush with attentive staff—the family also reflected on technology's potential role in improving patient management systems across similar facilities. They learned during an interview with a caregiver that although Alzheimer’s patients received dedicated attention from assigned caregivers responsible even for feeding duties, substantial bureaucratic paperwork made patient management cumbersome and less efficient than desired. Thus arose a clear need: implementing an online system could significantly enhance care coordination efforts while alleviating some administrative burdens faced by caregivers attending vulnerable individuals.

Overall, reviews surrounding various aspects of caregiving highlight both appreciation and frustration among families navigating senior living options during turbulent times. Although organizations like Episcopal Church Home exhibit strong points—excellent rehabilitative care, appropriate staffing levels, inviting environments—the pandemic spotlight has illuminated systemic issues requiring resolution both for immediate resident welfare and long-term operational improvements.

Restaurants

• Dubliner Pub (0.6 miles)
• Taco Bell (0.6 miles)
• BlackStack Brewing (0.7 miles)
• Brew Hall (0.7 miles)
• Surly Brewing Company (1.9 miles)
• Bole' Ethiopian Cuisine (2 miles)
• Giggles' Campfire Grill - Minnesota State Fair (2.2 miles)

Physicians

• Dermatology Consultants P.A. (0.7 miles)
• HealthPartners Health Center for Women Clinic St Paul (1.6 miles)
• Parkway Family Physicians (2.5 miles)
• Whittier Clinic (4.8 miles)
• West Side Community Health Services (5.2 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (1 miles)
• Walgreens (2.6 miles)
• Walgreens (2.6 miles)
• Walgreens (2.7 miles)
• Walgreens (3 miles)
• Walgreens (3.1 miles)
• Target Pharmacy (3.3 miles)

Cafes

• Groundswell (1.1 miles)
• Roundtable Cof (1.1 miles)
• Starbucks (2 miles)
• Dunn Brothers Coffee (5.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• St George Greek Orthodox Church (1.8 miles)
• WW Studio (2.5 miles)
• Cathedral of St Paul (3.5 miles)
• Westminster Presbyterian Church (4.8 miles)

Transportation

• Minnesota State Fair Transit Hub (1.9 miles)
• Union Depot (4.6 miles)
• Concourse D (5.1 miles)
• Concourse E (5.1 miles)
• Escape Lounge (5.1 miles)
• Delta Sky Club (5.2 miles)
• Concourse C (5.2 miles)

Parks

• Como Park (2.1 miles)
• Longfellow Park (2.2 miles)
• Franklin Terrace Off-Leash Dog Park (2.4 miles)
• Wabun Picnic Area (3 miles)
• Lake Hiawatha Park (3.4 miles)
• Minnehaha Falls Dog Park (3.6 miles)
• Hidden Falls Park (3.7 miles)

Hospitals

• University of Minnesota Medical Center - East Bank Campus (2.7 miles)
• United Hospital Joint Relacement Center (3.6 miles)
• VA Medical Center (3.9 miles)
• St Joseph's Hospital-St Paul (3.9 miles)
• Regions Hospital Burn Center (4.2 miles)
• Hennepin County Medical Center (4.2 miles)
• Csc Gi Lab (4.3 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Rosedale 14 (4 miles)