The Oakmont Costs & Pricing
The Oakmont offers a competitive pricing structure for its accommodations, standing out in the context of both Tehama County and the broader California market. For instance, the monthly cost for a studio apartment at The Oakmont is $2,389, significantly lower than the county average of $3,612 and far more affordable than the state average of $4,145. In terms of one-bedroom apartments, The Oakmont's rate of $3,479 is not only below Tehama County's average of $3,954 but also offers substantial savings compared to California's average cost of $4,340. For those looking for two-bedroom options, The Oakmont remains economically attractive with a monthly fee of $4,689 - slightly higher than the county's rate but substantially more reasonable compared to the state's average of $5,270. Overall, residents at The Oakmont can enjoy quality living arrangements at prices that are notably competitive within both local and statewide contexts.
| Floor plans | The Oakmont | Tehama County | California |
|---|
| Studio | $2,389 | $3,612 | $4,145 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,479 | $3,954 | $4,340 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,689 | $4,643 | $5,270 |
Overall Review of The Oakmont
common
20 reviews mention this
Caring staff and daily help
Residents and families consistently describe the staff as friendly, attentive, and supportive.
Across many reviews, people mention that staff members are welcoming, kind, and responsive. Several describe staff going out of their way to help with day-to-day needs, including support with things like communication and care check-ins. A few reviews also tie staffing to smoother day-to-day functioning, while one reviewer says staffing levels affected their experience. Overall, the staff reputation comes through as a main reason families felt comfortable recommending the community.
common
16 reviews mention this
Activities and live entertainment
Daily activities and regular entertainment are a recurring part of residents’ experience.
Many reviews highlight scheduled programming and the chance to stay engaged with others. Multiple people mention live music and community events, and others describe a steady mix of activities at different interests and ability levels. Reviews also point to an atmosphere where residents can choose how social they want to be, rather than feeling pushed into everything. Even when dining is discussed negatively, several reviewers still credit the calendar of activities for keeping life full.
caveat
12 reviews mention this
Meals are mixed and sometimes disappointing
Dining reviews are inconsistent, with some residents finding meals only acceptable or worse.
Some residents and visitors say the food is good or freshly prepared, and a number of reviews mention meals being provided and easy for families. But there are recurring complaints about quality, including reviews that say meals are “not very good,” that choices at mealtime are limited, or that portions can be inconsistent. A couple of reviews also describe service issues that affected their trust in dining. Taken together, dining seems to be a place where experiences vary rather than a clear strength for everyone.
differentiator
4 reviews mention this
Pricing is notably lower
Price is a selling point in reviews, aligning with the community’s lower-than-benchmark pricing range.
A few reviewers explicitly call out affordability or reasonable pricing, and one says they found it to be the lowest price. This lines up with the pricing range showing the community priced far below county and state benchmarks across unit types. If you’re comparing costs, reviews suggest price is one of the factors that makes the community feel like a practical choice for families.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Independence expectations don’t match
Some reviews suggest the community’s “independent living” positioning can feel overstated.
At least one reviewer says the community is advertised as independent living, but notes that some residents are not able to care for themselves, which they felt changed the environment. This theme shows up as a concern about fit and day-to-day expectations rather than a direct complaint about specific services. If independent living clarity is important to you, it may be worth asking how residents’ needs are handled in practice. Elsewhere, multiple reviews still describe support as helpful, so experiences may differ by household.
common
9 reviews mention this
Grounds and common areas
Several reviews focus on the property’s upkeep, landscaping, and welcoming common spaces.
Reviews frequently describe the building and grounds as clean, well-maintained, and inviting. Some people mention indoor common areas being accessible and easy to navigate, while others emphasize outdoor spaces like patios and walking areas. A few reviews also mention interior updates that made the space feel modern and comfortable. While opinions differ on room size, the overall impression of appearance and upkeep is a steady positive thread.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.