272 Coal St, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702
To contact a resident: (570) 822-3276
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Interfaith Heights Apartments
Pros
The place is very nice.
The new owners are nice.
Cons
The new owners are described as rude and unhelpful.
The staff are portrayed as ignorant and condescending, treating the tenants like trash.
Locks were changed, blocking access to the auntâs belongings and the cat for days.
Rent was paid, yet entry was denied and tenants were left waiting all day.
They threaten to press animal cruelty charges if the cat dies, showing hostility toward the pet.
Maintenance responses are described as poor at best.
The property's proximity to Sherman Hills is disliked.
Review
Interfaith Heights Apartments in Wilkes-Barre is best suited for seniors who prioritize affordability and a transition that could bring new energy from recently changed ownership. The community appears to lean into a fresh leadership direction, which can be appealing to residents or families seeking a renovation-minded approach and a willingness to bear some early teething pains as staff and policies settle in. Those who want a quiet, straightforward rental experience with an opportunity for improved service over time may find value here, especially if budget constraints are a primary concern and the prospect of change feels manageable.
For decision-makers with stringent expectations about on-site responsiveness, this property demands caution. Those who require consistently predictable maintenance response times, clear and courteous communication, or empathetic handling of personal belongings, particularly in sensitive moments such as a relativeâs passing, should seriously consider alternatives. The reviews flag the risk of delays and friction when access to units or possessions is needed, and that kind of inconsistency can be distressing for families coordinating complex transitions.
Positives do surface. The repeated note of ânice new ownersâ signals a fresh leadership approach that may translate into better service over time. A population that values visible management activity, potential property upgrades, and an evolving culture of accountability could benefit as the current transition matures. In other words, the potential for improved resident experiences exists, especially if new leadership commits to transparent policies, respectful staff interactions, and timely problem-solving.
Yet the downsides are hard to overlook and can be decisive for many families. The most troubling episode involves access to a deceased relativeâs belongings: delayed entry, contentious communication, and statements that reflect dismissiveness rather than service. Coupled with reports of a stafferâs rude demeanor and a perception that tasks are handled grudgingly, these incidents undermine trust in daily operations. Maintenance responsiveness is described as inconsistent at best, which compounds concerns for seniors who rely on prompt attention to safety-critical issues or routine repairs. The combination of poor communication and uneven service can quickly erode confidence in the communityâs ability to safeguard residentsâ interests.
These tensions donât cancel out the possible upside of new ownership, but they do shift the risk calculus. For families who can tolerate a developmental phase, with a clear expectation that service will improve as leadership settles into place, the upside remains location- and cost-advantageous. For those who cannot tolerate delays, uncertain access, or a staff culture that appears unsympathetic, alternatives with a track record of steady maintenance, courteous staff, and easily navigable policies should be prioritized. The decision should hinge on whether the anticipated gains from new ownership are enough to offset the current and potential friction points.
In practical terms, families considering Interfaith Heights should schedule deliberate visits and ask pointed questions before committing. Probe how access to a residentâs apartment and belongings is handled after a death or move-out, request a concrete maintenance turnaround time, and demand examples of how staff have improved service since the ownership change. If the responses are vague or defensive, that is a red flag. If the new leadership can present a credible plan to harmonize policy with compassion and reliability, it becomes a much stronger case. If not, it is prudent to compare other Wilkes-Barre properties with steadier applications of resident services, clearer communication, and a more consistently respectful atmosphere.









Exploring the World of Home Health Nurses: Qualifications, Roles, and Hiring Tips
Navigating Medicare Coverage for In-Home Care Services
In-Home Care Costs in 2025: A Detailed State-by-State Exploration