Anthology of Mason Costs & Pricing
The costs for residing at Anthology of Mason reflect a premium over both Warren County and the broader state average in Ohio. For instance, a studio apartment at Anthology is priced at $4,149, significantly higher than the county's average of $3,601 and the state's $3,727. Similarly, a one-bedroom unit costs $4,699, outpacing both Warren County's rate of $4,345 and Ohio's average of $3,712. The disparity becomes even more pronounced with two-bedroom accommodations - priced at $7,499 compared to just $4,340 in Warren County and an even lower state average of $3,501. These figures suggest that while Anthology of Mason offers amenities and services that may justify its higher price point, potential residents should carefully weigh their options against local market rates to ensure they find the best fit for their budgetary needs.
| Floor plans | Anthology of Mason | Warren County | Ohio |
|---|
| Studio | $4,149 | $3,601 | $3,727 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,699 | $4,345 | $3,712 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $7,499 | $4,340 | $3,501 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$199 / mo
Barrington of West Chester
$3,950 to $4,250 / month
5.1 miles away
-
from +$801 / mo
Barrington Of Oakley
$4,950 to $7,800 / month
10.7 miles away
-
from +$401 / mo
Courtyard At Seasons
$4,550 / month
6.4 miles away
-
from -$829 / mo
Brookdale Springdale
$3,320 to $4,960 / month
8.8 miles away
-
from +$146 / mo
Traditions at Camargo
$4,295 to $5,895 / month
8.1 miles away
Overall Review of Anthology of Mason
common
18 reviews mention this
Staff care and responsiveness stand out
Residents and families repeatedly describe staff members as caring and responsive to concerns.
Across many reviews, families describe staff who treat residents well, listen to questions, and follow through when they raise issues. Several reviewers also mention active communicationâespecially updates and being available to talkâwhich helped them feel confident after move-in. In the less favorable reviews, some families report the opposite experience with rudeness or inadequate check-ins, but there are also counterexamples describing attentive nursing and aides.
common
11 reviews mention this
Cleanliness is frequently mentioned
Multiple reviews point to a clean, well-kept facility and rooms.
Cleanliness comes up often, with reviewers describing a tidy building and staff who keep residentsâ rooms and laundry handled. Some reviews specifically call out overall cleanliness of the facility, while others mention day-to-day upkeep inside rooms. A smaller set of negative reviews include concerns about cleanliness and basic care routines, which suggests cleanliness isnât consistent for every resident experience.
common
12 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Many residents are described as enjoying organized activities and outings.
Families repeatedly mention activities, day-to-day engagement, and an activities coordinator or director who helps residents participate. Reviews include references to group events, arts and crafts, happy hour, entertainment, and outings, with residents described as more social and active. In contrast, at least one memory-care-focused review reports fewer activities and difficulties with night-time routines, indicating engagement may vary by care setting.
common
7 reviews mention this
Dining quality is a strong theme
Food and dining experience are commonly praised by residents and families.
Several reviews say the food is good, with some describing breakfast service and a dining experience that feels more than basic. Some families also mention how much their loved one liked meals and that they were served hot food. A few reviews express dissatisfactionâsuch as complaints that meals or dining hours werenât as expectedâso dining satisfaction is positive overall but not universal.
caveat
7 reviews mention this
Care consistency is a concern
Some reviews raise concerns about staffing consistency and care follow-through.
A cluster of critical reviews describe gaps in day-to-day care, including reports that nursing or caregivers did not check on residents as expected. Others mention staffing agency or temporary workers who didnât know residents well, and complaints about medication errors and inadequate hygiene support. Even with mentions of excellent in-house nurses in a couple of those reviews, the overall concern is that staffing coverage and routine follow-through were not consistent enough for the level of fees charged.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Pricing runs above benchmarks
Pricing is higher than local and state benchmarks across unit types.
The communityâs published pricing for studios, one-bedrooms, and two-bedrooms is positioned above nearby benchmarks. That matters most for families weighing the gap between what they expected from care and what they reported experiencing in reviews, including a few mentions of high fees alongside staffing or communication problems.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.