The Ashford at Sturbridge Costs & Pricing
At The Ashford at Sturbridge, residents can expect to pay $3,545 per month for a studio apartment, which is competitively priced compared to the median costs in Madison County and across Ohio. In Madison County, the average cost for a studio is slightly higher at $3,738, while statewide, it stands at $3,727. For those considering a one-bedroom unit, The Ashford offers this option for $4,280 per month. While this figure exceeds the costs found in Madison County ($3,704) and across Ohio ($3,712), it reflects the premium services and amenities that The Ashford provides. Overall, The Ashford at Sturbridge presents an attractive choice within the regional market for those seeking quality senior living options.
| Floor plans | The Ashford at Sturbridge | Madison County | Ohio |
|---|
| Studio | $3,545 | $3,738 | $3,727 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,280 | $3,704 | $3,712 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Abbington Of Powell
$3,610 / month
8.8 miles away
-
from +$325 / mo
Ohio Living Sarah Moore
$3,870 to $5,400 / month
19.4 miles away
-
from +$330 / mo
Feridean Commons Senior Housing LTD
$3,875 to $6,375 / month
16.6 miles away
-
from +$328 / mo
StoryPoint Gahanna
$3,873 to $4,952 / month
16.8 miles away
-
from -$545 / mo
Walnut Crossing
$3,000 to $5,600 / month
17.3 miles away
Overall Review of The Ashford at Sturbridge
common
18 reviews mention this
Food quality is inconsistent
Meals are a mixed bag, with some residents calling them much better and others calling them terrible.
Dining is one of the most common points of discussion. Several residents and families describe food as cold, horrible, lacking nutrition, or not seasoned to their liking. Other reviews note clear improvements after leadership and a chef change, including warmer meals and more choices. Even among positive comments, some families mention limited options or timing that didnât fit their loved one.
common
20 reviews mention this
Staff help can be responsive
Many families describe staff who are kind, attentive, and quick to respond to concerns.
Across reviews, staff treatment is often described as warm and helpful, with multiple mentions of people going above and beyond. Families highlight frequent positive interactions, including caregivers who communicate, help residents feel safe, and follow through on requests. Some reviews also single out specific staff members and leadership as making improvements. At the same time, a smaller set of reviews describe slow responses, unanswered messages, or high turnover that makes consistency harder.
caveat
14 reviews mention this
Care coverage and follow-through vary
Residents and families report uneven care coverage, especially for assistance needs and during busy times.
A recurring concern is whether help is consistently available when itâs needed. Some reviews describe missed assistance, delayed responses, or difficulty getting nurses or staff to follow through after requests. Several reviews also mention medication issues, communication gaps during emergencies, or concerns about understaffing impacting care. Other reviews contradict that experience by describing good medication management and attentive aides and nurses, but the overall feedback includes enough gaps that families say you may need to stay involved to ensure needs are met.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Communication and transparency raise concerns
Some families say communication and transparency about care details were inadequate.
A subset of reviews points to problems reaching staff or getting timely updates, particularly around medical events and when family members expect to be contacted. There are also complaints about how information is handled, including difficulty receiving records or incident-related details. Even where residents are described as being cared for, some families say follow-up emails and call-backs werenât returned quickly. Those themes show up alongside more positive communication accounts, suggesting the experience can depend on timing and staffing.
common
9 reviews mention this
Activities and community life feel social
Residents have access to scheduled activities and outings, and several families say it helps residents feel included.
Many reviews mention activities as part of daily life, including group events and opportunities to get out of the building for outings and shopping. Some families describe residents making friends and enjoying social time, while others say they havenât seen their loved one participate yet. The community also has a busy calendar described in at least a few reviews, and multiple comments connect activities with a sense of home. Reviews that are less positive still generally acknowledge that activities exist, but cite concerns such as staffing making it harder to keep them running consistently.
common
5 reviews mention this
Pricing is positioned as a value
Families mention pricing as a deciding factor, though a few reviews object to rising costs.
Several reviews describe selecting the community based on affordability or a simpler pricing structure. Some families frame it as good value compared with what they expected to pay elsewhere, and a few note that the cost helped make assisted living feel more manageable. On the negative side, a few reviews say rent increased and the care or service they received didnât match what they were paying. Overall, pricing comes up as both a draw and a reason for disappointment.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.