Rose Senior Living at Providence Park Costs & Pricing
Rose Senior Living at Providence Park offers competitive pricing for its residents when compared to both Oakland County and the broader state of Michigan. The cost of a studio apartment at this facility is set at $3,445 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $4,577 and also beneath the state average of $3,824. For one-bedroom accommodations, Rose Senior Living's price of $3,635 aligns closely with the county's figure of $3,507 while remaining above the state average of $3,384. However, it's in the two-bedroom category where a notable difference appears; priced at $5,000 per month, it exceeds both Oakland County's average of $3,881 and Michigan's average of $3,523. Overall, Rose Senior Living provides a range of options that cater to diverse needs while maintaining value in comparison to regional averages.
| Floor plans | Rose Senior Living at Providence Park | Oakland County | Michigan |
|---|
| Studio | $3,445 | $4,577 | $3,824 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,635 | $3,507 | $3,384 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $5,000 | $3,881 | $3,523 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$445 / mo
Hutcheson Manor
$3,000 to $4,500 / month
9.6 miles away
-
from +$355 / mo
Silverbell Manor
$3,800 / month
22.6 miles away
-
from -$245 / mo
Vicky's Place
$3,200 to $6,000 / month
9.7 miles away
-
from +$155 / mo
Pineview Manor
$3,600 / month
20.6 miles away
-
About the same
Briar Hill Assisted Living
$3,500 to $4,500 / month
9.8 miles away
Overall Review of Rose Senior Living at Providence Park
common
42 reviews mention this
Staff kindness and responsiveness stand out
Residents and families repeatedly describe staff who are kind, attentive, and easy to work with.
A large share of reviews emphasize a welcoming feel and staff who take time to be kind and responsive. Multiple families mention help coordinating care needs, medication support, and quick follow-through when concerns come up. Even some less-positive reviews still acknowledge the building cleanliness and that staff can be friendly, though accessibility and consistency are called out as issues.
common
28 reviews mention this
Food quality shows up often
Dining is frequently described as consistently good, with many families calling the food excellent.
Food is one of the most commonly discussed day-to-day positives, with residents and visitors mentioning the dining room atmosphere and consistently good meals. Some reviews also highlight diet accommodations and special dining needs, including specific restrictions. A smaller set of comments mention food flexibility or preferences as a drawback, and one review outright disagrees with the overall food quality.
common
24 reviews mention this
Activities and outings help residents engage
Reviews describe a steady schedule of activities and social options that keep people occupied.
Many reviewers point to the community calendar and the variety of activities, including outings and events on and off site. Several mentions tie engagement to resident enjoyment, with references to group gatherings, entertainment, and opportunities to get out of the apartment. A few reviews raise concerns about activity frequency or the level of stimulation for memory care residents, but the overall activity presence is a frequent theme.
common
22 reviews mention this
Apartments feel like home
Residents and visitors frequently describe the apartments as clean, updated, and apartment-like.
Across reviews, people commonly describe the living spaces as well kept, bright, and more like a regular apartment than an institution. Outdoor access is another repeated detail, with mentions of patios and balconies, along with landscaped views and nearby trails. Some comments suggest rooms and layouts can vary by unit type, and a couple of reviews note misses like limited outdoor seating in independent living.
caveat
14 reviews mention this
Care support is a mixed bag
Care experiences vary, with some families praising close monitoring while others describe breakdowns in attention or communication.
Several reviews describe strong support for medical needs, including medication management, monitoring, and coordination with providers. Some also mention better continuity of care because the community works alongside a nearby hospital. At the same time, multiple critical reviews focus on care-process problems in memory care or assisted living, including communication gaps, concerns about supervision, and dissatisfaction with activity and attention details for residents with cognitive needs.
caveat
10 reviews mention this
Pricing is repeatedly called out as high
Families frequently say the community is expensive, and a few describe that costs didn’t match what they received.
Cost comes up as a recurring concern, with some reviewers saying it was out of budget or describing the overall pricing as too high. A few critical comments also describe frustration around what they believed were additional charges or not receiving the level of service expected for what they paid. While many reviews recommend the community despite the expense, the affordability theme still shows up often enough to stand out.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.