Selah Care And Rehabilitation

Pros

• The staff at Selah Convalescent were caring and attentive to the needs of the residents.
• The aides provided good support, with particular praise for the bath aide who was skilled and accommodating.
• Daily activities were offered, ensuring that residents had engaging options suited to their abilities.
• Monthly outings in a van allowed residents to enjoy excursions outside of the facility when possible.
• The facility maintained a smoke-free environment indoors, promoting better health for all residents.
• Meals were thoughtfully planned with a set menu and an alternative entrée available for those who needed it.
• The dining hall provided a communal space for residents to enjoy meals together, fostering social interaction.

Cons

• The dividing curtain between the beds was filthy, reflecting poor cleanliness standards in the facility.
• The floors were dirty most of the time, indicating inadequate housekeeping.
• A properly sized bed for a tall resident was not provided despite requests, which shows neglect in meeting patient needs.
• The alarm system intended to ensure safety was ineffective, as demonstrated by an incident where the administrator found the resident outside in the parking lot due to staff's inability to locate it.
• The facility's age and lack of updates contributed to an overall outdated and uncomfortable environment for residents.
• Accessing administrative offices required navigating through a crowded building across an alley, which is inconvenient and unprofessional.
• Many rooms accommodated multiple residents (up to four), limiting privacy and personal space for patients.
• There was no communal space outside of rooms or the dining hall for residents to spend their time, which restricts social interaction opportunities beyond mealtimes.
• The menu generally consisted of leftovers from previous meals, suggesting a lack of variety and quality in food options.

Review

Selah Convalescent offers a mixed experience for patients recovering from surgical procedures, as demonstrated by the recent review of a husband's stay following hip surgery. While there are some positive aspects to the facility, several significant concerns have surfaced regarding hygiene, accommodations, and the overall infrastructure of the building. This summary aims to encapsulate both the commendable elements and areas needing improvement in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of what potential residents and their families may encounter.

The condition of the facility presents notable challenges that detract from the overall care experience. During his two-week stay, cleanliness emerged as a pressing issue; for instance, the dividing curtain between beds was reported as filthy and indicative of broader sanitation problems. Moreover, the flooring was noted to be dirty most days, which raises substantial concerns regarding infection control and general upkeep. To compound these issues, the facility appeared to lack necessary updates or renovations; being an older establishment, it reflected timeworn decor and infrastructure that may not align with modern expectations for health care environments.

Accommodation-related problems also surfaced during this patient’s recovery journey. Standing at 6'4", he was provided with a bed that was too short for his frame despite prior requests for an appropriately sized sleeping arrangement. The absence of essential safety measures further compounded these issues; for instance, he required alarms on both his bed and chair due to his tendency to stand without assistance. An alarming incident underscored this point when an administrator found him wandering outside in the parking lot because no one could locate the missing alarm.

Although there were clear deficiencies in facilities and accommodations, it is worth noting that staff members generally exhibited caring attitudes and professionalism during interactions with residents. Reviewers highlighted that staff did not appear overworked or burdened by excessive resident assignments—an aspect crucial in ensuring quality care. The aides' training varied: while most performed their duties adequately, some lacked extensive training skills; however, exceptions were noted such as competent bath aides who catered well to resident needs.

Engagement activities played a positive role within Selah Convalescent’s offering: at least one daily activity ensured residents remained stimulated mentally and socially. These activities seemed tailored adequately to fit various ability levels among residents—a commendable focus on individual capacities that aids emotional well-being during recovery processes. Additionally, monthly outings were organized for residents who could participate—offering them fresh air beyond facility confines—and accessibly accommodating those using wheelchairs.

The dining experience at Selah Convalescent also merits examination—it featured set menus with an alternative entré option typically deriving from leftovers from previous meals. Dinner served in the evening followed an assigned seating pattern within a communal dining hall where trays arrived via dumbwaiter from lower kitchen levels—a potentially efficient but impersonal method of food service. For those unable to attend meals due to illness or infirmity, insulated carts delivered food directly to their rooms instead; thus catering somewhat effectively though still lacking warmth associated with homemade meal experiences.

Ultimately, Selah Convalescent presents both strengths and weaknesses firmly rooted in its operations—exemplified by caring staff committed to resident welfare juxtaposed against dilution stemming from outdated facilities rife with sanitation issues. Although adequate activities exist fostering engagement among residents coupled with policy efforts ensuring non-smoking environments—elements undeniably essential for preserving health—the pressing need for modernization looms large above all other considerations impacting quality of life at this facility making it imperative for management teams looking towards improving future standards here onwards.

Parks

• Selah Parks & Recreation Department (0.2 miles)
• Volunteer Park (0.5 miles)
• Harlan landing (1.6 miles)
• Chesterley Park (2.9 miles)
• Miller Park (3.3 miles)

Pharmacies

• Howard's Drug (0.3 miles)
• River Village Pharmacy (2.5 miles)
• Fred Meyer Pharmacy (2.8 miles)
• Epic (3.5 miles)
• Sav-On Pharmacy (3.6 miles)
• Rite Aid (3.8 miles)
• Walgreens (3.9 miles)

Restaurants

• Tailgaters Bar & Grill (0.3 miles)
• Toro Taco (0.4 miles)
• Red Rooster Bar & Grill (0.6 miles)
• Powerhouse Grill (2.8 miles)
• McDonald's (2.8 miles)
• Fondita El Habanero (2.9 miles)
• Yakima Inflatables (2.9 miles)

Physicians

• Selah Family Medicine (0.9 miles)
• Astria Health Center - Selah Clinic (0.9 miles)
• Lake Aspen Professional Group (2.2 miles)
• Pinnacle Healthcare Center (2.2 miles)
• Pinnacle Sleep and Wake Disorders Centers (2.2 miles)
• Water's Edge (2.2 miles)
• Murphy Mary Lou PA - Waters Edge Pain Clinic (2.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• Selah Covenant Church (1.2 miles)
• Grace Temple Ministries (3.1 miles)
• Morning Star Church (3.3 miles)
• Trinity Church of the Nazarene (3.3 miles)
• Foundation Stone Ministry (3.4 miles)
• First Baptist Church of Yakima (3.5 miles)
• Catholic Charities Housing Services - Diocese of Yakima (3.6 miles)

Hospitals

• Happy Time (2.6 miles)
• Health Management Associates (3.8 miles)
• Yakima Hma (4 miles)
• Yakima Ambulatory Surgical Center (4 miles)

Cafes

• Peet's Coffee and Tea (2.8 miles)
• 40th Avenue Espresso (2.9 miles)
• White House Cafe (3.3 miles)
• Cafe Amore (3.8 miles)

Transportation

• Bnsf Railway (3.5 miles)
• Greyhound Station (3.8 miles)