4932 Alderson St., Schofield, WI 54476
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Cedar Ridge III offers an attractive monthly rate for private rooms at $2,600, significantly lower than the average costs within Marathon County and across Wisconsin. In comparison, the county's average stands at $3,534, while the statewide average reaches $4,339. This pricing structure not only makes Cedar Ridge III a cost-effective option for individuals seeking quality care but also underscores its commitment to providing accessible services in a region where expenses can be notably higher. By offering competitive rates without compromising on care standards, Cedar Ridge III positions itself as a favorable choice for families exploring long-term living arrangements.
| Floor plans | Cedar Ridge III | Marathon County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $2,600 | $3,534 | $4,339 |
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
A few people left comments that paint a highly contrasting picture of care and concern within this place. On one hand, there are voices that feel deeply unsettled and even furious about how some residents are treated, how quickly help comes, and whether staff are truly equipped to provide compassionate, responsible care. On the other hand, at least one reviewer expresses real gratitude, describing the facility as a place where caregivers truly look after a loved one, with a sense of family involvement and professional oversight. Taken together, the reviews sketch a landscape of intense frustration for some families, alongside a heartfelt appreciation from others.
In the most troubling account, a grandmother was reportedly left on the toilet and had to scream for help because no one appeared to respond. The reviewer recalls being told she was "left to cry" in that moment, and adds a jarring insult: someone called her a b!t?h. The commenter emphasizes that their grandmother was treated "like a dog," and that the situation represents a serious failure in basic dignity and safety. The tone is urgent and accusatory, insisting that this cannot go unaddressed and that it must be fixed. The author even signals that they intend to push for changes - "these people don't deserve that kind of treatment," and they threaten actions aimed at shutting the place down if improvements aren't made.
Another reviewer raises a broader concern about staffing practices, suggesting that there are people working there who have previously been fired from caregiving roles for bad behavior. The implication is that such histories should disqualify someone from working with vulnerable populations, and the reviewer argues that rehiring individuals with past problems is unacceptable when patients are dying or in serious need of reliable, trustworthy care. This sentiment underscores a fear that accountability and safe staffing aren't being adequately safeguarded at the facility, fueling a sense of distrust and anxiety about daily operations and future incidents.
A separate quote highlights a blunt, personal boundary spoken to a resident: "YOUR WORKING THERE TO HELP THESE PEOPLE. Fix it or I will make sure this place gets shut down." This line - paired with the claim that a family member was confronted with a staff attitude that diminished the resident's status - drives home the intensity of the caller's demand for professional behavior, respect, and immediate corrective action. The reviewer reiterates that no one in such a setting deserves the kind of care they allege their grandmother received, insisting that system-wide improvements are not just desirable but mandatory.
There are also accounts that focus on neglect in medical and daily-care tasks. One reviewer recounts a grim scene in which their father never received an antibiotic prescribed by the doctor for an infected toe, while their mother, visiting from a different generation (age 79), had to contend with the father's incontinence and personal waste, having to clean and turn him at times. Such details point to concerns about timely medication administration and the burden placed on family members for basic hygiene and caregiving tasks, suggesting a persistent gap between medical guidance and on-the-ground care.
Amid the strongly negative experiences, another voice offers a glowing endorsement. This reviewer calls the caregivers "amazing" and says they are grateful for choosing Cedar Ridge for their mother. They describe the place as family-run with a nurse on site 24 hours a day, which conveys a sense of comprehensive oversight, continuity of care, and a personal touch that can make a meaningful difference in a resident's daily life. This positive report stands in stark contrast to the harsher criticisms, indicating that experiences can vary widely even within the same facility.
A second negative entry further details dissatisfaction with medical follow-through. The reviewer notes that, without the sister's placement, their father might not be in that facility at all, but they recount a long wait of about 45 minutes for a prescribed asthma spray. They claim they were told their father did not have asthma, despite medical history and input from the doctor. They also accuse staff of failing to follow up on doctor-prescribed treatments, such as nebulizer therapies, and of a lack of engaging activities for the resident. Additionally, they describe a delay of more than half an hour to attend to a simple wound - cleaning and bandaging a cut - adding to a mounting impression of neglect in both routine and urgent care tasks.
Taken together, these reviews present a mosaic of experiences that can feel almost two different realities living under the same roof. Some families describe moments of alarming neglect, disrespect, and procedural failures that threaten safety and dignity, while others recount a supportive, attentive environment where professionals and family involvement work in harmony. The stronger narratives of concern call for immediate, transparent accountability, stronger safeguards against staffing with problematic histories, and a reopening of conversations with families about care standards and daily routines. Meanwhile, the affirmative account reminds readers that with the right combination of oversight, dedicated staff, and a family-centered approach, a facility can indeed feel like a trusted, compassionate place in which a loved one can receive meaningful, respectful care.
Cedar Ridge III is an assisted living community located in Schofield, WI, specializing in providing memory care for seniors. With a focus on creating a safe and supportive environment for individuals with memory-related conditions, our dedicated team of caregivers is committed to ensuring the overall well-being and quality of life for our residents.
Our community offers respite or short-term stays, allowing caregivers to take a break while their loved ones receive exceptional care in a comfortable and compassionate setting. We understand the challenges that come with caring for individuals with memory impairments, and our highly trained staff is equipped to provide personalized assistance and support tailored to each resident's unique needs.
Surrounded by convenience, Cedar Ridge III enjoys close proximity to various amenities that enhance the residents' experience. With four cafes nearby, residents can enjoy delicious meals and socialize with friends or family over coffee or snacks. Additionally, there are eight parks within reach where seniors can engage in outdoor activities or simply enjoy peaceful walks amidst scenic surroundings.
Healthcare accessibility is another advantage of our location. The presence of 11 pharmacies ensures that medication needs are easily met, while the availability of 15 physicians enables prompt medical attention when required. In case of emergencies or specialized healthcare services, we have five hospitals nearby that offer comprehensive healthcare solutions.
To cater to diverse spiritual beliefs and practices, there are 13 places of worship in close proximity to our community. This allows residents to continue their religious rituals and find solace within their faith communities. For those seeking entertainment options, one theater nearby provides opportunities for cultural experiences and enjoyable outings.
Transportation options are readily available, with three transportation services nearby ensuring easy access to medical appointments, shopping centers, and various other destinations.
At Cedar Ridge III in Schofield, WI, we strive to create a warm and nurturing environment where residents feel valued and supported throughout their journey. With an array of amenities nearby designed to enhance quality of life and facilitate engagement with the local community, our assisted living community is the ideal choice for individuals seeking memory care services in a comfortable and convenient setting.
Cedar Ridge III offers an attractive monthly rate for private rooms at $2,600, significantly lower than the average costs within Marathon County and across Wisconsin. In comparison, the county's average stands at $3,534, while the statewide average reaches $4,339. This pricing structure not only makes Cedar Ridge III a cost-effective option for individuals seeking quality care but also underscores its commitment to providing accessible services in a region where expenses can be notably higher. By offering competitive rates without compromising on care standards, Cedar Ridge III positions itself as a favorable choice for families exploring long-term living arrangements.
Cedar Ridge III is located at 4932 Alderson St., Schofield, WI 54476 in Marathon County, Wisconsin
Yes, Cedar Ridge III provides memory care services for residents with mild or advanced stages of dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
The Pines Apartments
Weston, WI
Very affordable rents; good access to nearby amenities.
The Pines Apartments costs
The Pines Apartments reviews
The Pines Apartments images
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
The article compares assisted living and skilled nursing facilities, detailing their differing levels of assistance, medical support, cost structures, and day-to-day experiences. It emphasizes that assisted living is for those needing help with daily activities while maintaining independence, whereas skilled nursing facilities provide intensive medical care with 24-hour staff supervision.
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
Vibrant Senior Living emphasizes active senior living communities that promote independence and engagement through diverse amenities and activities, fostering wellness and social interaction among older adults. These communities range from independent to assisted living, with a focus on personal growth, family involvement, financial planning, and leveraging technology to enhance residents' experiences.
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Assisted living provides moderate support for seniors seeking independence, while memory care offers specialized support for individuals with dementia or cognitive impairments through structured routines and trained staff. Key differences include care approaches, environment security measures, staff training levels, activity types, and cost considerations.