Country Club Village Apartment

Pros

• The apartments are really nice, safe and secure with a nice pool.
• The complex offers lovely apartments and a relaxed, friendly atmosphere.
• The manager is respectful and businesslike.
• The services manager works hard to bring interesting programs to residents and is accommodating.
• All units are on the first floor, making accessibility easy for residents.
• The staff are very friendly.
• The staff go out of their way to provide extra financial help to tenants, including food banks, utility assistance, and annual farmers markets.
• Neighbors are helpful and care for one another.
• The neighborhood is very clean and organized.

Cons

• Elevators lack proper air ventilation.
• Senior apartments will be torn down soon.
• Maintenance is slipshod.
• The staff is disrespectful.
• Upper management disregards tenants' complaints.
• Their policy requires a 30-day notice to terminate a lease if tenants disagree.
• There is poor drainage and sidewalks have dry mold that is unsafe when wet; sidewalks are not treated during snow/ice.
• Most tenants are talked down to or belittled.
• They do not return phone calls, and their hours are unhelpful.
• They are strict on rules.

Review

These apartment communities present a mixed but vivid portrait of modern living that blends safety, convenience, and a strong sense of community with a number of service-oriented programs - and, at the same time, a set of ongoing challenges. For many residents, the appeal starts with secure, comfortable spaces that include a swimming pool and easy access to amenities. Some reviewers highlight the elevator-equipped layouts and note a desire for better air ventilation in the elevators, signaling attention to comfort and accessibility even as some systems push for improvement.

A recurring thread among the more favorable reviews is the atmosphere and the people who run and use the property. Residents describe a relaxed, friendly vibe and a management team that is respectful and professional. The on-site services manager is praised for hard work and accommodation, with notable efforts to present residents with meaningful programs and events. Neighbors are depicted as helpful and supportive, creating a sense of community where people look out for one another and feel cared for by staff who bend over backwards to assist with resources and opportunities.

Alongside these positives, there is emphasis on practical programs designed to ease living costs and improve daily life. Several accounts note tangible support such as Food Bank access, utility assistance, and an annual farmers market, all aimed at helping tenants stretch their budgets. In addition, some buildings are described as senior-friendly, with all units on the first floor in certain properties, a feature that many residents value for accessibility and ease of movement. The combination of accessible design and active community programming contributes to a sense of thriving, especially for older residents who prize stability and connections.

However, not all feedback is uniformly favorable, and there are several contrasting themes that appear in the reviews. One line of criticism centers on maintenance and management practices, with some residents labeling support as slipshod or indifferent and accusing upper management of disregarding complaints. There are mentions of a rigid lease-termination stance - "give us 30 days' notice, and we'll let you out of your lease" - which has left some tenants feeling boxed in during disputes. These tensions suggest a gap between the ideal of attentive, responsive management and the lived experience of frustration for residents with ongoing problems.

Infrastructure and safety concerns also surface in the critiques. Specific issues include poor drainage and sidewalks with a persistent dry mold that becomes unsafe when wet, along with a lack of snow and ice treatment in winter. These conditions raise real safety concerns for residents navigating paths and common areas. The social climate within some buildings is described negatively as well, with reports that many tenants feel talked down to or belittled, contributing to a sense of discomfort or dissatisfaction among those who expect respectful treatment and prompt accountability from staff.

Communication problems appear repeatedly, adding to the impression that the experience can be inconsistent. A number of reviewers report that attempts to contact the management or office staff go unanswered, sometimes over extended periods, and that business hours can be unhelpful for people who are balancing work and daily responsibilities. One comment even notes a perception of anti-complaint friction, suggesting a climate where residents feel discouraged from voicing concerns or seeking recourse.

Interwoven with these critiques are several affirmative notes about cleanliness, organization, and safety. Some reviewers characterize the neighborhoods as very clean and well-organized, and others emphasize that the community can be a safe haven for disabled or elderly residents. In certain cases, mothers who have lived there for decades describe a culture of strict rules but also a real commitment to keeping buildings up to date and maintaining a sense of order. Taken together, these observations paint a nuanced picture: a place with meaningful strengths in community, accessibility, and programs, yet still grappling with maintenance quality, responsive communication, and some safety-related infrastructure issues.

For anyone considering a move to these apartments, the message is balanced and practical. The properties offer a promising combination of safety, a welcoming community, accessible designs, and active resident programs that can make daily life more affordable and engaging. At the same time, potential residents should be aware of real concerns around maintenance consistency, responsiveness of management, and certain physical conditions like drainage and mold on sidewalks, particularly in adverse weather. A visit and conversations with current residents would likely illuminate how each building handles these issues today, and whether the positive community aspects align with individual expectations and needs.

Physicians

• Yesnocovid (0.4 miles)
• Dilley Allergy & Asthma Specialists (0.6 miles)
• Methodist Cardiology Clinic of San Antonio-Transitional Clinic (1.2 miles)
• San Antonio Preventive & Diagnostic Medicine (1.4 miles)
• Gastroenterology Clinic Of San Antonio (1.4 miles)
• Advanced Pain Relief Institute (1.4 miles)
• 2040 Building (1.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.4 miles)
• Walgreens (1.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.3 miles)
• Walgreens (2.3 miles)
• Walgreens (2.4 miles)
• Walgreens (2.6 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.5 miles)
• Starbucks (4.6 miles)

Restaurants

• Las Palapas (0.7 miles)
• Babe's Old Fashioned Hamburgers (0.8 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (1 miles)
• Hawx Burger Bar & Electro Lounge (1.3 miles)
• Whataburger (1.4 miles)
• Charley's Cheesesteaks (1.5 miles)
• McDonald's (1.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Texsan Heart Hospital (1 miles)
• Methodist Hospital (1.1 miles)
• St Luke's Baptist Hospital (1.3 miles)
• University Hospital (1.4 miles)
• University Hospital Sky Tower (1.4 miles)
• Audie L Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital (1.5 miles)
• Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital (1.5 miles)

Parks

• Medical Center Volleyball Courts (1.4 miles)
• Woodlawn Lake Park (3.9 miles)
• Phil Hardberger Dog Park (4.6 miles)
• Phil Hardberger Park (4.7 miles)

Theaters

• Cinemark San Antonio 16 (2.3 miles)
• Alamo Drafthouse Park North (3.4 miles)
• Regal Huebner Oaks & RPX (3.5 miles)

Places of Worship

• Primera Iglesia Bautista Mexicana-San Antonio (2.6 miles)
• St George Episcopal School (2.8 miles)
• St Ann's Catholic Church (4.5 miles)

Transportation

• Exit 567/Fredericksburg Rd/E (4.2 miles)
• Landmark Aviation (4.9 miles)