Richfield Living Costs & Pricing
Richfield Living offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to both Salem City and the broader Virginia state averages. For instance, a studio at Richfield Living is priced at $757, significantly lower than the corresponding charges of $2,989 in Salem and $4,436 across the state. Similarly, one-bedroom apartments are available for $903, again presenting a substantial savings when juxtaposed with Salem's rate of $3,685 and Virginia's average of $4,257. The two-bedroom option is priced at $1,066, which maintains this trend of affordability relative to local and state benchmarks. Even the semi-private rooms are set at $3,046 - a cost that remains below both Salem's and Virginia's averages. Overall, Richfield Living stands out as a value-driven choice for residents seeking quality living without the premium price tag commonly found in surrounding areas.
| Floor plans | Richfield Living | Salem city | Virginia |
|---|
| Studio | $757 | $2,989 | $4,436 |
| 1 Bedroom | $903 | $3,685 | $4,257 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $1,066 | $4,094 | $4,602 |
| Semi-Private | $3,046 | $3,324 | $3,991 |
Overall Review of Richfield Living
common
22 reviews mention this
Staff care is a clear theme
Many residents describe staff as friendly, caring, and responsive to needs.
Across the reviews, residents and families frequently mention staff members as kind, friendly, and attentive to day-to-day needs. Several reviews also describe staff as helpful with comfort, adjustments, and resident well-being. A smaller set of reviews contrasts this by criticizing compassion, communication, or follow-through, suggesting the experience can vary by situation and unit.
common
6 reviews mention this
Dining quality gets strong mentions
Dining is often described positively, with meals and variety singled out.
Multiple reviews call out the food as good or great and mention meal variety. One resident also notes using meal options that affect daily social time, and another describes having strong meal satisfaction when they moved in. A counterpoint is that some reviews criticize food quality and preparation, describing meals as less satisfying than expected.
common
7 reviews mention this
Activities and outings keep days full
Residents mention calendars, outings, and group activities as part of life here.
Several reviews describe a steady schedule of activities, including day trips and a daily calendar of events. Others add details like bingo, special holiday decorating, and regular social time through meals and gathering areas. A couple of reviews also mention limitations, including fewer events than before or questions about transportation for specific needs.
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Care response issues raise concerns
Some families report problems with care response and coordination when needs escalated.
While some residents speak well of care, multiple reviews raise serious concerns about how staff handled urgent needs. Several families describe delayed help, communication breakdowns, or administrators not addressing medical questions during discharge or hospice-related advocacy. There are also mentions of call-button effectiveness and pain-medication denials in terminal situations, which drove strong negative recommendations.
common
4 reviews mention this
Clean facilities and attractive apartments
Reviews frequently point to cleanliness and well-kept spaces.
Some reviewers describe clean rooms and facilities, and one notes both cleanliness and apartment design as meeting expectations. Others describe the campus and centers as well maintained, reinforcing the idea that the physical environment is a strength. A few negative reviews focus more on staffing and care outcomes than cleanliness, so the overall picture relies on these positive observations.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.