3911 Portland, Irving, TX 75038
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Centre for Neuro Skills (CNS) in Irving, Texas presents a complex, mixed picture. On one hand, there is clearly talent and dedication among the rehab teams, with residents reporting meaningful improvements in balance, confidence, daily living skills, and cognitive focus. On the other hand, the residential portion of the facility is described by multiple reviewers as troubled by safety lapses, hygiene concerns, staffing instability, and questions about privacy and security. Taken together, the accounts suggest a facility with real potential for recovery and rehabilitation, but with systemic problems in its residential environment that can undermine that work.
A central thread across many reviews is the contrast between effective, sometimes life-changing rehabilitation therapies and a residential setting that feels unsafe or degrading. Several reviewers credit the CNS rehab services and the clinicians with tangible progress: regaining balance, improved cognitive function, and the ability to perform daily activities more independently. In some testimonials, people describe the staff as friendly, professional, and highly qualified, and they credit specific caregivers or the program itself with meaningful gains in function and confidence. For example, some residents say they learned to walk again or regained essential skills, and they emphasize that the therapists and nurses provided valuable, focused care during therapy sessions.
However, the same voices frequently report serious concerns about the residential environment where patients live between therapies. Apartments are described as in disrepair and poorly maintained, with insufficient cleaning and sanitation. A particularly troubling anecdote describes a patient being rolled from a bathroom to a dining table without sanitation of the wheelchair or hands, illustrating perceived lapses in basic hygiene and patient dignity. Accessibility issues are noted as well, with reports that wheelchair access is inconsistent or inadequate across the facility, complicating daily life for recovering patients who rely on mobility aids.
Safety and security are another major point of contention. Reviewers describe a location adjacent to low-income housing with weak overall security: gates not fully enclosed, apartment doors often left unlocked, and night-time staffing gaps that leave patients more exposed. These security concerns are closely tied to fears about staff turnover and inconsistent care, with frequent changes in caregiving personnel leading to a lack of continuity and knowledge about each patient's needs and plan of care. The risk of improper transfers, including untrained staff attempting to move patients in and out of wheelchairs, is highlighted as a direct safety issue. Privacy rights and consent also come up in several anecdotes, including mentions of staff entering bathrooms without warning and worries that ongoing documentation around patient behavior could be used to affect insurance benefits - anxiety that underscores a broader sense of vigilance and mistrust among families and residents.
Communication gaps compound these safety and privacy concerns. Families often report that their questions and concerns go unanswered, or that important changes in medications and treatment plans aren't consistently documented or communicated. In a system described as overworked, critical information can get lost between the residential staff and management, leaving patients vulnerable during transitions or changes in care.
Against these stark concerns, there are consistent threads of reassurance: many reviewers describe dedicated, capable staff on the rehabilitation side who genuinely care about recovery. They point to individuals who are attentive and thorough in therapy, and to nurses and therapists who are able to help patients regain function and independence. Some residents describe experiences where the staff's professionalism, empathy, and expertise made a real and positive difference in their recovery trajectory. These testimonials contribute to a sense that CNS has the potential to deliver high-quality neurological rehabilitation when the residential environment is functioning well.
Personal experiences among reviewers are highly variable, with some calling CNS a great place for recovery and praising specific staff members, including property managers and caregivers who they felt listened and responded to concerns. Others recount much more negative experiences, including criticisms of "ghetto" or temp agency staff, sleeping shifts, routine firing and hiring of personnel, and a general sense that the residential program did not meet basic expectations for safety, cleanliness, or dignity. A few accounts emphasize dramatic contrasts: places where the therapy was effective and staff supportive, paired with apartments that felt unsafe or undervalued, making recovery more stressful than it should be.
Overall, the consensus across these reviews is that CNS holds genuine promise for people recovering from brain injury, stroke, or other neurological events, primarily through its rehabilitation therapies and the expertise of its clinical staff. Yet the residential component - the living environment in which patients spend significant time between therapies - appears to be in need of substantial overhaul. The most pressing concerns center on sanitation, accessibility, safety and security, continuity of care, and privacy. For families and patients weighing CNS as an option, the decision seems to hinge on how heavily they weigh the potential for meaningful rehabilitation against the risk of subpar residential conditions.
If you're considering CNS for yourself or a loved one, it may be wise to focus on two questions: Are you confident in the rehabilitation team and the progress achievable through therapy? And can you address or mitigate concerns about the residential setting - sanitation, accessibility, and safety - through advocacy, additional home care supports, or exploring alternative centers or care arrangements? In sum, CNS offers credible therapy and hopeful outcomes for many, but the residential experience described by several reviewers points to an urgent need for comprehensive improvements to ensure safety, dignity, and consistent quality of care.
The Centre For Neuro Skills Unit 2 in Irving, TX is a board and care home that offers exceptional care services for individuals in need of assistance with daily activities. The community provides a comfortable and fully furnished living environment for its residents.
Residents can enjoy nutritious meals in the dining room which accommodates special dietary restrictions. Housekeeping services ensure a clean and organized living space. Move-in coordination is offered to assist residents in transitioning smoothly into their new home.
The community features outdoor spaces such as gardens, allowing residents to relax and enjoy the fresh air. Telephone and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet are available to keep residents connected with their loved ones.
Care services provided include assistance with bathing, dressing, transfers, diabetes diet management, medication management, and coordination with health care providers. Staff can also arrange transportation for medical appointments.
The Centre For Neuro Skills Unit 2 is conveniently located near various amenities including cafes, pharmacies, physicians' offices, restaurants, transportation services, places of worship, and hospitals. This ensures that residents have easy access to the resources they may need.
Scheduled daily activities are offered to keep residents engaged and entertained within the community.
Centre For Neuro Skills Unit 2 is located at 3911 Portland, Irving, TX 75038 in Dallas County, Texas
Avalon Memory Care - Irving
Irving, TX
Compassionate staff with strong family communication in memory care.
Avalon Memory Care - Irving costs
Avalon Memory Care - Irving reviews
Avalon Memory Care - Irving images
Chateau on Wildbriar Lake
Irving, TX
Caring staff and a warm, home-like community with beautiful grounds and appealing amenities.
Chateau on Wildbriar Lake costs
Chateau on Wildbriar Lake reviews
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Assisted living provides moderate support for seniors seeking independence, while memory care offers specialized support for individuals with dementia or cognitive impairments through structured routines and trained staff. Key differences include care approaches, environment security measures, staff training levels, activity types, and cost considerations.
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Assisted living communities offer diverse activities beyond traditional games to enhance seniors' physical health, cognitive well-being, emotional enrichment, and social connections, including fitness classes, creative expression, and intergenerational interactions. These enriching programs foster community bonds and support residents' independence and happiness.
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
The article differentiates between assisted living and memory care, explaining that assisted living supports seniors with daily activities while promoting independence, whereas memory care provides specialized services for individuals with dementia, focusing on secure environments and cognitive support. It also addresses staff training, safety considerations, costs, family involvement, and transition strategies for families navigating these care options.