Fairmont Grand Manor I
Save409 East Fairlane Drive, Rapid City, SD 57701
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Fairmont Grand has been a place of strong, mixed feelings for a family member who entrusted his uncle to its care. The overall picture comes from two different moments in time: an earlier, sharply negative set of experiences voiced by a concerned medical power of attorney and family member, and a later update that acknowledges some improvements after management changes. The uncle in question has a cognitive disability, and the reviewer emphasizes that this circumstance made consistent, thoughtful care especially important. The update itself signals a more hopeful tone, suggesting that the facility did strive to improve even amidst chaos and turnover.
In the original set of comments, the most persistent and painful problems centered on medication management and communication. The reviewer describes being told that all medications would have to go through the facility's program, only to be contacted about medications late in the process, sometimes when the uncle was nearly out of medicine. The reviewer recalls being stuck on hold for long periods - "for an hour, wait for an hour, get tired and hang up" - and then hearing what they believed to be misleading or inaccurate messages. The implication is that critical health needs were not being checked or synchronized in a timely fashion, a serious concern when a family member's well-being depends on reliable access to medications and clear guidance about medical routines.
Other major themes from the old review concern the transfer into Fairmont Grand and the logistical hurdles that followed. The new facility allegedly required an additional in-town evaluation, even though the information from the previous doctor was the same and the in-town doctor reportedly knew less about the uncle's day-to-day needs than the prior clinician. The reviewer also notes a problem with money and billing: a deposit and a voided check were required for direct withdrawal, but this was not communicated, and the reviewer's checkbook was left behind out of state. There was also an expectation that certain items would be furnished for the uncle's shared room, information that arrived only at the last minute, forcing a move-in date to be pushed back. The upshot, according to the reviewer, was the added stress and disarray of a first-time transition into a shared living situation that felt like a dorm rather than a home.
Financial concerns lay heavily in the assessment of value. The reviewer questions the cost in light of the friction, miscommunications, and the perceived churn of management. "For how much is being paid it is not worth it," they write, and they describe an ongoing effort to relocate the uncle elsewhere, even partnering with state agencies such as DSS and DHS to try to untangle the situation. The sentiment is a warning to others: "Save yourself the hassle and avoid this place at all costs." The language is blunt and urgent, reflecting a deep frustration with the administrative and financial sides of care, as well as with the emotional toll of watching a family member struggle to get needed support.
A significant portion of the critique is devoted to staff and management dynamics. The reviewer singles out a facility manager, Waysha W. F., and two med techs described as rudely and unprofessionally run, with a troubling sense of in-group politics - "They smile in your face but talk behind your back." The claim that Waysha had no real control over the staff, despite her position as the leader, is meant to underscore a sense of organizational dysfunction. The reviewer also alleges a culture in which residents are pressured to profess their affection for the facility, and where staff who speak up on residents' behalf or who report concerns about abuse could face retaliation, including dismissal. The claim that advocacy for residents could lead to negative consequences is alarming and paints a picture of a workplace where safe, respectful reporting is perceived to be discouraged.
Within the same broad critique, there are voices that reveal a more nuanced, albeit inconsistent, experience. The old review does acknowledge some positive moments: there are memories of extremely rude behavior observed in the memory care unit during a visit, but also mentions dementia unit staff described as wonderful and caring. The dementia unit is praised for its atmosphere - described as well-run, with clean facilities and reliable laundry service. There are also remarks about the physical campus itself: four cottages that felt like a homey, cottage-living environment, recently upgraded and beautifully appointed. The staff in the dementia unit are framed as supportive and capable, and there is gratitude expressed for the care they provided, as well as appreciation for the reasonable pricing that made the facility seem a more affordable option.
The update provided by the reviewer later shifts the emphasis somewhat. It acknowledges that management turnover and changes led to confusion and inconsistency at times, but also credits the facility with meaningful improvements that helped the uncle receive better accommodations for his cognitive needs. The reviewer describes the care as having grown more home-like and notes that, despite ongoing challenges, the staff and administration did make efforts to adapt to the uncle's needs over time. In this later voice, Fairmont Grand is portrayed as a place that can offer a sense of home and belonging, particularly when there is a willingness to adjust practices and respond to individual residents' requirements.
Taken together, the narratives converge on a central tension: Fairmont Grand is capable of providing compassionate, attentive care - especially in its dementia-focused areas and in terms of creating a warm, home-like environment - yet it also embodies significant organizational and practical shortcomings. The early experiences highlight frustrating delays, miscommunications, and an expensive, high-stakes mismatch between expectations and reality for families managing complex medical and cognitive needs. The later update, while not erasing those past difficulties, suggests that the facility's leadership and staff were taking steps to address them and to tailor care more closely to an aging loved one with a cognitive disability. For families evaluating this facility, the stories paint a portrait of a place that can feel like home and offer meaningful care in some settings, but which also requires vigilance, persistence, and a willingness to advocate vigorously for timely, coordinated medical and daily-living support.
Fairmont Grand Manor I in Rapid City, SD is a luxurious assisted living community that offers exceptional care services and an array of amenities. Residents can enjoy the convenience of dining in a spacious dining room where delicious meals are served daily. The community is fully furnished with comfortable and elegant furniture, ensuring that residents feel at home.
Fairmont Grand Manor I also boasts a beautiful garden where residents can relax and enjoy the natural surroundings. The community provides housekeeping services to ensure that residents' living spaces are always clean and tidy. Move-in coordination is available for those transitioning into the community.
Outdoor space is available for residents to enjoy fresh air and engage in outdoor activities. Telephone service and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet connection are provided, allowing residents to stay connected with friends and family.
The community offers comprehensive care services, including assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. There is coordination with health care providers to ensure that residents receive necessary care. Special dietary needs, including diabetes diets, are accommodated in meal preparation and service. Medication management services are also provided.
Transportation arrangements, both for medical needs and doctors' appointments, are available for the convenience of residents. Residents can also take advantage of nearby cafes, parks, pharmacies, physicians, restaurants, places of worship, and hospitals.
At Fairmont Grand Manor I in Rapid City, SD, residents can enjoy a vibrant lifestyle filled with engaging activities while receiving personalized care in a luxurious environment.
Fairmont Grand Manor I is located at 409 East Fairlane Drive, Rapid City, SD 57701 in Pennington County, South Dakota
Fairmont Grand Manor I on seniors.fyi includes 6 photos including images showing interior, living room, piano, television, decor, painting, hallway, wall art, and more.
There`s A Hart
Rapid City, SD
Convenient access to numerous nearby amenities (cafes, parks, pharmacies, restaurants, places of worship, physicians, hospitals).
There`s A Hart costs
There`s A Hart reviews
There`s A Hart images
Edgewood Rapid City
Rapid City, SD
Spacious, welcoming apartments with attentive staff and restaurant-style dining.
Edgewood Rapid City costs
Edgewood Rapid City reviews
Edgewood Rapid City images
Good Samaritan Society - Echo Ridge
Rapid City, SD
Spacious, well-designed apartments with attentive staff and convenient on-site amenities.
Good Samaritan Society - Echo Ridge reviews
Good Samaritan Society - Echo Ridge images
Home Instead - Rapid City, SD
Rapid City, SD
Excellent caregiver matching with compassionate, personalized in-home care and flexible scheduling.
Home Instead - Rapid City, SD reviews
Home Instead - Rapid City, SD images
Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance
Senior move management services assist older adults in the relocation process by providing emotional support and organizational help, addressing unique challenges like downsizing and moving from long-term homes. These specialists collaborate with real estate agents and manage logistics, making the transition smoother for seniors and their families.
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living
The article examines senior housing options, detailing the distinctions between independent living and assisted living, along with the emerging "independent assisted living" model that blends both approaches. It highlights the importance of assessing individual needs, preferences, and financial factors in making informed decisions about suitable living arrangements for seniors.
The deductibility of assisted living expenses on taxes hinges on factors like the individual's medical condition and service nature, typically requiring the resident to be "chronically ill" per IRS definitions. Taxpayers may deduct eligible medical expenses related to personal care services but generally not rent unless primarily for medical care, and they should maintain thorough documentation to support claims while considering itemizing versus standard deductions.