506 Mattox Road, Greenville, NC 27834
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Oak Haven Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Oak Haven Assisted Living offers competitive pricing compared to the broader market in Pitt County and across North Carolina, making it an attractive option for seniors seeking quality care. For a semi-private room, residents pay $1,850 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,122 and the state average of $3,584. Studio apartments at Oak Haven are also priced favorably at $2,300, compared to $3,799 in Pitt County and $4,020 statewide. For those requiring a private room, Oak Haven's rate of $4,000 is still more economical than Pitt County's average of $5,234 while remaining within reach of the state average of $4,425. Overall, Oak Haven provides exceptional value for its residents without compromising on the quality of care and amenities offered.
| Floor plans | Oak Haven Assisted Living | Pitt County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,850 | $3,122 | $3,584 |
| Studio | $2,300 | $3,799 | $4,020 |
| Private | $4,000 | $5,234 | $4,425 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$145 / mo
The Fountains at The Albemarle
$1,995 to $5,430 / month20.1 miles away
Overall Review of Oak Haven Assisted Living
Pros
There are a very select few workers who do care about the residents.
Cons
The staff, aside from a very select few, do not care if the residents live or die.- The administrator, Patricia, is extremely neglectful.
- The facility has mice and bugs and refuses to call an exterminator.
- They do not provide round meals for the residents; a salad and applesauce is not a proper round meal.
- Multiple pills have been found on the floor that do not belong to the residents, suggesting possible wrong medication.
- The place is horrible, and they would not leave their loved ones there.
Review
Oak Haven Assisted Living in Greenville, NC is best suited for families who must choose a budget-conscious option and are prepared to supervise care closely. The strongest value proposition here would appeal to residents who are largely independent and require only light assistance, paired with family oversight to ensure daily routines and safety standards are met. For seniors with complex medical needs, memory care requirements, or a demonstrated need for consistent, attentive staff, this community is not the ideal home; families should be ready to compare alternatives that offer robust supervision and stronger accountability.
On the upside, a portion of the reviews note pockets of care and moments when staff showed genuine concern. Some caregivers are described as remembering routines and preferences, suggesting that when the right staff is present, residents can receive adequate basic assistance in a familiar, smaller setting. Those positives imply that Oak Haven can work for individuals who can rely on regular, on-site oversight from family members and who do not require intensive medical or behavioral support. However, the favorable experiences appear sporadic and contingent on shifting personnel, underscoring how fragile the perceived quality can be when staffing varies.
The most piercing concerns revolve around leadership and daily operations. The administrator is singled out as neglectful by at least one reviewer, painting a picture of a facility where accountability and proactive management may be lacking. Hygiene and pest issues, mice and bugs, appear persistent, with residents and families reporting a reluctance to engage extermination services. Medication safety emerges as a particularly serious risk, including worries about pills left on floors and the possibility of incorrect dosages being administered. Nutrition is another flashpoint, with references to meals that fail to be round or nutritionally adequate, calling into question daily living adequacy. Taken together, these factors cast doubt on Oak Haven’s ability to provide consistently safe, hygienic, and well-managed care.
These significant drawbacks clearly offset the handful of positives. In assisted living, consistency in safety, nutrition, medication administration, and responsive oversight is non-negotiable; a few caring staff members cannot compensate for systemic gaps in leadership and operations. When families must intervene repeatedly to protect a loved one from neglect or to push for basic services, the underlying model becomes unsustainable for long-term ongoing care. The facility’s appeal as a smaller or potentially more affordable option loses weight when opposed by credible reports of deteriorating safety and reliability. The conclusion is not merely that there are flaws, but that those flaws are pervasive enough to risk resident well-being on a daily basis.
For families weighing Oak Haven, practical due diligence is essential. An in-person tour should be scheduled during typical meal periods and after bedtime hours to observe interaction quality, response times, and the cadence of routine care. Obtain and scrutinize state inspection reports and any corrective action plans, especially around medication handling and pest control. Ask for the exact medication management protocol, and request to witness a supervised medication pass. Engage multiple residents and their families in conversations about day-to-day life, including meal quality, housekeeping responsiveness, and the consistency of staff assignments. Insist on a formal, written care plan with measurable goals and a clear process for regular family updates. If possible, negotiate a trial period with explicit exit terms to assess whether the care level meets expectations without prolonged exposure to risk.
Ultimately, Oak Haven presents a troubling risk profile for seniors who depend on reliable safety, consistent care, and respectful treatment. For most families, alternatives with stronger staffing, better medication oversight, and verifiably higher hygiene standards should be pursued. If no other option is available due to location or price, the choice must be paired with unwavering family oversight, rigorous monitoring, and a concrete contingency plan to relocate at the first sign of trouble. The prudent stance is to treat this community as a last-resort option rather than a preferred home, prioritizing facilities that demonstrate transparent staffing levels, clear accountability, and an evident commitment to resident dignity and safety.
54 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Memory Care
Activities on-site
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Memory Care Pathways: A Holistic Guide to Dementia Support
Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences