5076 Waterman, St. Louis, MO 63108
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Allways Kare Residential Facility
Cons
The upper floors were in very poor condition.- The living room was cluttered with tables and chairs.
- The staff turnover was high.
Review
Allways Kare Residential Facility in St. Louis is best suited for families who have very few options and must choose primarily based on proximity and familiarity rather than any expectation of high-quality care or pristine upkeep. The scarce feedback available paints a picture of a facility that functions as a basic, long-term housing option rather than a polished, professional care setting. For families willing to accept modest routines, limited staffing consistency, and a straightforward, no-frills environment, this community may fit as a last-resort choice. It is not positioned as a premium option, and prospective residents should calibrate expectations accordingly.
Care seekers should explicitly consider alternatives if safety, cleanliness, and stable caregiving are non-negotiables. The reported issues, very poor conditions on the upper floors, crowded and cluttered common spaces, and high staff turnover, signal ongoing maintenance challenges and inconsistent support. In a market like St. Louis, there are communities with clearer care protocols, better-maintained interiors, and lower turnover that more reliably meet families’ expectations for daily living, responsiveness, and safety. Where access, visible upkeep, and dependable staffing matter, pursuing other options will likely yield a better match.
The main cons are concrete and consequential. The upper-floor condition suggests maintenance neglect that could translate into safety risks for residents who require assistance or mobility support. A living area crowded with tables and chairs points to cramped spaces that hinder social interaction, movement, and safe egress in an emergency. Staffing instability compounds those concerns, since turnover disrupts continuity of care, increases the chance of missed cues or delayed responses, and erodes trust. With a single negative review on record, there is limited corroboration of care quality, amplifying uncertainty for families weighing long-term residence.
One potential, albeit limited, positive signal is the implication that a brother lived there for six years. This could indicate that, for some residents, the environment remains tolerable enough to stay despite flaws, perhaps due to affordability, location advantages, or personal attachment. Yet stability of occupancy does not offset systemic maintenance issues or gaps in staffing. In practical terms, this means the facility may offer a basic daily rhythm, but cannot be counted on to deliver consistently attentive, safe, and dignified care over time. That lack of a demonstrable strengths profile makes the risk-to-reward equation hard to justify for most seniors.
Families evaluating options should insist on a thorough tour and candid discussions about maintenance plans, staffing, and escalation procedures. Inspect the upper floors and common areas for signs of wear, moisture, and cleanliness; ask about renovation timelines and budgeting for ongoing upkeep. Probe about staff scheduling, turnover rates, and the training process for aides and caregivers. Seek current resident or family references and compare with facilities that publish inspection results or incident reports. If possible, observe meal times, programming, and staff responsiveness to routine needs, because these concrete daily indicators reveal the true quality of care beyond marketing language.
Bottom line: Allways Kare Residential Facility appears ill-suited for seniors who require reliable, high-quality care and consistently well-maintained surroundings. The main drawbacks, poor maintenance on the upper floors, cramped living spaces, and high staff turnover, are not evidently offset by any clear strengths, making it a risky choice for long-term residence. Families should strongly consider alternatives that demonstrate stable staffing, cleaner facilities, and safer, more open common areas. If no better-fit option is located, this community can function as a temporary placeholder only, with a concrete plan to transition as soon as possible to a higher standard of care.
20 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Lambert-St Louis International (9 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Diabetic care with personalized assistance and on-site activities.
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States