117 South 15 Th Street, Saint Joseph, MO 64501
To contact a resident: (816) 676-1505
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Heartland II
Pros
The staff were very nice to him, especially Rose.- Rose gave him many chances when he would come back drunk.
- She was very understanding of his problems.
- He has nothing but good things to say about Rose.
Cons
The facility is described as very corrupt and wicked.- There is extensive mental abuse occurring at the facility.
- The facility is filthy and has a depressing atmosphere.
- There is abuse of power and violations of residents’ rights.
- Staff are accused of stealing from residents.
- The facility should be shut down due to mistreatment of residents.
Review
Heartland II in Saint Joseph, Missouri is best suited for residents who prize warm, one-on-one interactions with a small care team and can tolerate a less structured, more relationship-driven live-in environment. A former resident highlighted a caregiver, Rose, as a standout for patience and understanding, noting she gave chances despite lapses. That kind of staff engagement can translate into steady, familiar support for someone who relies on consistent personal contact and flexible responses to day-to-day challenges. In practice, this suggests a setting where meaningful social connection and forgiving, attentive supervision may feel like a real asset for memory support or behavioral management, provided the environment remains as personally oriented as that single account implies.
Yet this community demands a hard-eyed assessment before any move. Alternatives should be seriously considered for families who prioritize safety, accountability, and consistently clean, well-governed facilities. The most troubling feedback portrays a troubling pattern: accusations of corruption, theft, and mistreatment, with residents allegedly denied contact with families and rights violations. One reviewer explicitly signals intent to pursue legal action on behalf of a family member. A second reviewer characterizes the facility as filthy, depressing, and prone to abuses of power. Taken together, these voices raise a red flag that safety and dignity may be at odds with a nurturing persona.
Pros such as staff kindness, a willingness to accommodate personal history or behavioral quirks, and a caregiver’s occasional flexibility do not offset the weight of the cons described. Personal rapport can soften bad days, yet it cannot ensure protection from theft, isolation, or mental abuse, nor can it compensate for broad questions about governance and oversight. The mention that Heartland 1, owned by the same operators, shares similar criticisms reinforces the sense that the issues may be systemic rather than isolated to a single building. For families weighing a move, these concerns should tilt the decision away from Heartland II unless a verifiable, profound change is demonstrated and sustained.
Any commitment to Heartland II should be preceded by rigorous, independent due diligence conducted onsite. Demand the most recent safety audits, a transparent log of complaints, and candid conversations with current residents about daily life, privacy, and freedom to maintain family connections. Observe how staff interact with residents, assess the cleanliness and overall ambiance, and probe the responsiveness of administration to concerns. Insist on clear, documented procedures for grievance handling, incident reporting, and a demonstrated track record of addressing problems promptly. Given the severity of the negative firsthand accounts, this level of scrutiny is not optional.
Practically, this means comparing Heartland II with other Saint Joseph options that display stronger safety records, transparent governance, and cleaner, more uplifting environments. Seek facilities with stable leadership, active family involvement, and explicit rights protections. If the goal is dependable social engagement paired with reliable oversight, prioritize places with higher ratings, steady staffing, and proven safeguards for resident autonomy. In short: Heartland II may appeal to a very narrow niche, one that can tolerate significant risk while chasing personal warmth, but for most families, stronger, clearer options are the smarter, safer route.
Bottom line: Heartland II is not a broad recommendation for families seeking reliable assisted living. Its strongest asset, the potential for warm, individualized care, appears overshadowed by serious concerns about integrity, safety, and environment voiced by multiple reviewers. A prudent path is to explore other local options first, and to treat Heartland II as a last-resort choice only after comprehensive verification of current operations and a clear, enforceable commitment to resident rights and safety.
52 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs