1400 East 24Th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Resident Services
Pros
The care provided at the facility is excellent, and staff clearly care about residents.- The facility offers a wide array of health and mental health programs, including a fitness room with a personal trainer, music rooms, bus passes, and tobacco cessation support.
- The Aunt Louella experience suggests it is a great place to live, with privacy identified as the main area for improvement.
- The artwork on the walls is nice.
- The programs include robust social and mental health programming and personal scheduling options.
Cons
Rabin was not a good supervisor.- The only thing that needs improvement is bedroom privacy.
- There was mold and cold sandwiches.
- This place is in need of real public service.
- Rooms are jail-cell size.
- Residents are allowed $97 a month after any SSI.
Review
This Minneapolis community is best suited for seniors and adults in need of a robust, on-site program ecosystem: comprehensive health and mental health supports, structured activities, and convenient access to transportation and dining. It works best for individuals who view programming as job- or quality-of-life enhancers, fitness facilities with a personal trainer, music rooms, therapy and social work services, and a menu-driven, cafeteria-style dining experience. For residents who prize active engagement, regular scheduling, and a broad network of supportive services, the pros align with daily life here. It is less ideal for those who prioritize large, private living spaces, pristine privacy, and a hands-off living environment.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are residents who place a premium on bedroom privacy, transparent and straightforward billing, and stable, clearly governed administration. The most vocal drawbacks center on privacy in shared units and the impression of uneven governance. Reports of limited personal space, walls or dividers that feel makeshift, and concerns about mail handling raise questions for families seeking a high degree of autonomy and confidentiality. Additionally, questions about payroll deductions and overall administrative transparency point to a structure that may not suit those who require rigorous financial clarity and strong resident governance.
The strongest selling points are substantial: attentive staff and care teams that residents praise for their dedication, plus a broad slate of services that cover health, mental health, and wellness needs. The facility’s breadth of programming, from fitness and nutrition to substance-use programming and social-mental health initiatives, provides tangible value for residents who want life-skills support and ongoing engagement. On-site professionals such as dietitians, access to three meals daily, and the availability of transportation assistance further extend independence and reduce day-to-day planning stress. In short, the ecosystem can significantly elevate quality of life for those who actively participate and leverage these resources.
Yet the most persistent concerns offset these strengths. Living quarters described as “jail cell size” and divisions created by hanging sheets highlight serious privacy and comfort trade-offs. Mail handling concerns, the perception of limited personal autonomy, and a sense that billing proceeds with less transparency than expected undermine trust. Reports of pay deductions and a sense that administrative control rests with a single owner reinforce worries about governance and accountability. Mold and quality-of-life annoyances, paired with older carpeting and overall building upkeep, add another layer of hesitation for families weighing long-term residency.
When the positives are weighed against the negatives, a clear pattern emerges: the programmatic depth and staff care can deliver meaningful benefits for residents who actively engage with services and tolerate compact living spaces. For families who can accept potential privacy trade-offs in exchange for access to diverse health and wellness resources, this community represents a compelling value proposition. However, for those seeking predictable, transparent governance, straightforward financials, and true apartment-style privacy, the balance tilts toward alternatives that emphasize these priorities.
In the end, the recommendation is pragmatic and specific: pursue this community if the goal is an actively engaged, service-rich environment and if the family can tolerate intimate living arrangements and governance questions with a plan to monitor and address them. For households where privacy, transparent finances, and clean governance are nonnegotiable, it is prudent to explore other options first, and to compare staffing stability, unit layouts, and the clarity of billing structures. Before deciding, insist on a candid tour focused on private vs. shared space, request recent financial statements and a clear explanation of any deductions, and speak with current residents about day-to-day life and grievance resolution processes.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (6 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs