2540 12Th Avenue South Unit #2, Minneapolis, MN 55404
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Caring Home Health I Costs & Pricing
Caring Home Health I offers a competitive monthly rate of $2,950 for studio accommodations, which is notably lower than the average costs in Hennepin County and across Minnesota. In comparison, the typical cost in Hennepin County stands at $3,713, while the statewide average is slightly less at $3,617. This pricing positions Caring Home Health I as an attractive option for individuals seeking quality care without the premium price tag often associated with similar facilities in the region. The affordability of their services underscores a commitment to providing accessible healthcare options while maintaining high standards of care.
| Floor plans | Caring Home Health I | Hennepin County | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,950 | $3,713 | $3,617 |
Overall Review of Caring Home Health I
Pros
They are truly wonderful staff and owners who consistently delivered outstanding service to customers.
Twin Cities Caring is the best home health care service in Minnesota, with amazing people and unwavering support.
They care deeply about both employees and clients, creating an environment of trust and respect.
The management team is organized and professional, always ensuring clients' and workers' needs are met on time.
They are the best PCA company around, known for dedication and reliability.
The company provides great service, paying attention to detail for both client and employee needs.
Hefsa is described as the best; everyone at the company is nice, efficient, knowledgeable, and professional.
The company is the absolute best option for loved ones, with excellent service and genuinely caring people.
Cons
The company never gets it right.
The company has been overbilling the state, which is against the law.
Clients suffer because of this.
Clients lose hours due to this, and yearly PCA turnover forces new replacements.
An investigation is necessary.
The company has lost another PCA because the PCA is not getting paid.
On the first day of cleaning, an item was stolen.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking exceptionally attentive, people-centered home health in Minneapolis where caregiving is treated as a professional vocation and the operations are visibly organized. The core strength lies in staff and leadership that residents and families consistently describe as wonderful, respectful, and reliable. When care matters most, personal attention, patient communication, and a sense of being truly looked after, the reviewers point to a level of service that feels stable, thorough, and genuinely caring. For families prioritizing a high-touch, relationship-focused model of home health, Caring Home Health I stands out as a strong match.
Those who may want to consider alternatives include anyone with heightened sensitivity to billing integrity and continuity of care. A small but vocal subset of reviews raises serious concerns about billing practices and the reliability of caregiver assignments, including overbilling allegations and frequent PCA turnover that disrupts consistency. In addition, there are mentions of a theft incident on a first day, which, in the eyes of some families, signals a risk profile that warrants independent verification. For families who cannot tolerate potential billing ambiguity, frequent caregiver changeovers, or unresolved incident handling, exploring options with a calmer billing history and steadier caregiver staffing would be prudent.
The prominent pros tilt the balance toward choosing this provider when the priority is a well-managed operation with compassionate, detail-oriented care. The staff and management are repeatedly described as professional, organized, and responsive, with a genuine commitment to both clients and employees. Caregivers are portrayed as patient, respectful, and capable of delivering dependable, on-time service, which translates into greater peace of mind for families managing medications, routines, and daily needs at home. The organizationās emphasis on supporting teams, so caregivers feel valued, helps sustain quality and reliability, a critical factor for anyone navigating chronic conditions or progressive needs.
Still, the main cons carry enough weight to influence the decision, especially for families where predictable costs and continuity are non-negotiable. Billing concerns, even if not universally experienced, create a risk of unexpected adjustments and hours lost, which can complicate budgeting and care planning. PCA turnover further challenges continuity, potentially requiring new caregivers to learn preferences, routines, and medical nuances repeatedly. The reported theft incident, while not universal, adds a layer of caution about on-site safety and the importance of transparent incident reporting and accountability. These factors do not erase the strong service ethos, but they do require proactive management by families who choose this route.
Practically, if this agency is on the short list, approach with a clear, action-oriented plan. Request a dedicated case manager and a predictable caregiver roster to minimize turnover disruptions. Insist on a transparent, written billing policy with regular reconciliations and access to audit records. Inquire about safeguards for client property and clear incident-resolution procedures, including how theft claims are investigated and addressed. Commission a measurable trial period, say 30 to 60 days, with defined expectations for continuity, response times, and caregiver familiarity before committing long term. These steps turn the positives, the proven care culture and organized leadership, into a low-risk decision.
In the end, Caring Home Health I offers a compelling proposition for families who prize warmth, professionalism, and dependable home-based care delivered within a structured, attentive framework. It is a choice that rewards those who can tolerate, or better yet demand, robust governance around billing and workforce stability. For households with tighter controls on cost transparency or a lower tolerance for caregiver turnover, it may be wise to compare alternatives that demonstrate ultra-clear billing histories and steadier caregiver assignments. When the criteria align, this community delivers a remarkably capable, compassionate home health pathway that can sustain independence and comfort with a reassuring sense of stewardship.




Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained