Town Square Apartments in East Grand Forks, MN

Pros

• There are tenants who still care about the building and its residents.
• There are two tenants and their families who care and advocate for themselves and other tenants.

Cons

• The landlord is ridiculous and acts like a know-it-all.
• He believes everything is fine and dandy, which is comical when he actually does his job.
• Maintenance response times are severely delayed because he hires the cheapest option.
• He hires cheap workers who gave him a deal or are the cheapest option, regardless of quality.
• The reviewer would not recommend renting from this company.
• The carpet was not new when the occupant moved in and has never been replaced.
• The kitchen cupboards are falling apart.
• Bedbugs were present in the unit a few years ago.
• The building itself isnā€™t well maintained.
• Town Square Apts would not be recommended.
• The owners and management do not want to take responsibility for not keeping the building up to code since the flood in 1997.
• The resident manager denied all claims of tenantsā€™ complaints.
• There is mold and other toxins within the walls, ceilings, bathroom fans, and vanities.
• Only two air quality tests have been conducted.
• Living there has caused residentsā€™ health to deteriorate.
• The management does not seem to care about the tenants.

Review

Town Square Apartments in East Grand Forks, MN is best suited for budget-conscious renters who can tolerate a volatile maintenance experience and a hands-off management approach. The unitā€™s condition and the reported management style point to a place where upkeep is inconsistent and repairs arrive only after persistent prompting, often with uneven results. Residents describe a landlord who treats maintenance as a low priority, relying on cheaper labor and slow response times rather than investing in essential improvements. Interiors show aging wear, carpets not replaced, kitchen cupboards deteriorating, and a general sense that basic repairs are improvised rather than planned. For tenants who must keep housing costs down and can live with ongoing maintenance frustration, Town Square may feel tolerable in the short term, but the compromises are real.

Those who need a reliably safe, code-compliant living environment should seriously consider alternatives. Multiple tenants report mold and other toxins, odors, and air-quality concerns that have drawn public health involvement, suggesting long-standing neglect and inadequate remediation. The sense that complaints are dismissed by management, and that tenants must escalate to media to be heard, speaks to a troubling lack of accountability. Bedbugs were reported in the past, and visible wear such as failing cabinets and water-related damage signals ongoing risk. For seniors, families with respiratory or allergy issues, or anyone requiring consistent sanitation and safety, exploring other options is strongly advised.

On the surface, affordability stands out as the potential redeeming factor, especially in a market where rents can surge. The logic is straightforward: lower rent can offset the burden of older fixtures and a less polished environment. Yet the savings are outweighed by the persistent downsides. When repairs lag, health and comfort deteriorate, and the overall living experience becomes a contest between paying less and accepting ongoing chaos. In short, any modest price advantage evaporates if health risks persist and reliability stays elusive.

The primary drawbacks dominate the lived experience: a management team described as disengaged from accountability, paired with delayed and underfunded repairs. The building is portrayed as poorly maintained, with aging carpets, scaffolding of cabinetry, and other visible signs of neglect that never seem to be addressed. Mold and air-quality concerns, with only sporadic testing, raise legitimate health alarms. Chronic bronchitis and other illness concerns linked to toxins compound the worry, especially for occupants with preexisting health conditions. The atmosphere of feeling unheard by leadership exacerbates dissatisfaction and increases the likelihood of resident turnover and continued disrepair.

Decision-making should begin with a rigorous on-site assessment and candid conversations with current tenants about response times and the reliability of repairs. Prospective renters ought to demand recent mold and moisture documentation, comprehensive air-quality tests, and a clearly documented move-in/move-out condition. It is essential to verify the history of pest control, maintenance staffing levels, and whether any code-compliance issues have been resolved. If staying is considered, negotiate concrete remediation timelines, rent credits for ongoing issues, and a formal commitment to routine preventative maintenance. Alternatives that offer stronger governance, timely repairs, and verifiable health and safety measures deserve serious consideration.

In sum, Town Square Apartments is unlikely to satisfy households needing predictable safety and steady upkeep. For those prioritizing affordability and who can tolerate chronic maintenance hassles and potential health risks, it may be worth a cautious look, provided strict protections and clear remediation plans are in place. For most families and individuals, especially seniors and anyone with respiratory sensitivities or reliability requirements, the prudent move is to explore other East Grand Forks options or nearby communities with stronger maintenance records and transparent management. The next step is a thorough visit, direct conversations with tenants, and a demand for concrete evidence of repairs, pest-control history, and a credible path to a consistently safer, cleaner home.