Cedars of Lebanon

Pros

• Laurie has been great.
• Laurie is very accommodating, knowledgeable, and kind.
• Laurie always helps with anything and everything.
• Laurie is a super manager.
• The Cedars is a blessing.
• The Cedars is a really nice place.
• The building is safe, secure, and clean.
• The staff is very accommodating to residents' every need.
• The place is very clean and the people are so nice.
• The building is being repainted and new cabinets are being installed this year.

Cons

• The apartment is infested with bedbugs.
• Bedbug infestations persisted despite treatments, indicating inadequate handling by management.
• The apartment was not inspected prior to treatment.
• Smoking is not controlled and management does not enforce the smoke-free policy.
• The place is described as horrible to live in and management is accused of lying.
• Customer service is horrible and managers are pushy.
• The building smells of cigarette smoke.

Review

Cedars of Lebanon is best suited for independent seniors who crave a warm, socially engaged community with a highly responsive on-site management team. The setting appeals to families and residents who want hands-on help navigating move-in logistics, locating furniture, and coordinating accommodations for a smoother transition. It favors those who value a clean, safe-feeling environment and appreciate staff who seem to go the extra mile in addressing everyday needs. For a resident who wants a sense of belonging, regular interaction with managers, and a property that is actively being refreshed, this community can feel like a good fit.

Those who should consider alternatives are clear: anyone who cannot tolerate recurring pest issues or who requires a more consistently enforced safety and cleanliness standard. Bed bug infestations have been a painful thread in several reviews, with multiple accounts describing ongoing treatments and inspections that did not meet expectations. If a guaranteed pest-free living space is non-negotiable, or if a robust, proactive pest-management record is a priority, it is prudent to explore other options. Likewise, if a smoke-free environment is essential and the buildingā€™s tobacco culture remains a disruption, other communities with strict enforcement may be preferable.

The strongest positives here center on management and community care. Laurie Hasty and the broader staff earn repeated praise for accommodation, attentiveness, and problem-solving, characteristics that can translate into genuine peace of mind for families dealing with transitions and daily concerns. Residents note a clean, safe building and visible efforts to keep apartments up to date, including repainting and cabinet improvements as part of ongoing updates. The sense that residents are heard, and that moving-in and orientation can be made smooth, stands out as a meaningful advantage for those who value reliable, approachable leadership.

Yet the downsides cannot be dismissed. Bed bugs surface repeatedly as a core fault line, with multiple accounts describing infestations and inconsistent or insufficient responses from management. Coupled with frequent references to cigarette smoke in common areas and a building atmosphere that some find oppressive, these issues threaten comfort and long-term satisfaction for certain households. Add in occasional reports of interpersonal friction, inconsistent enforcement of house rules, and a few comments about safety concerns or disruptive residents, and a decision to stay requires weighing tolerance for these realities against the positives of management and community life.

In weighing the pros and cons, the key question becomes: does strong, accessible leadership and ongoing property refreshing offset ongoing pest and smoke concerns? For families who prize hands-on management and a community that feels cared for, Cedars can deliver a lived-in, supportive experience, particularly during the transition into independent living. However, for those whose priority is a consistently pest-free, strictly smoke-free environment with uniformly high standards of resident conduct and policy enforcement, alternatives may offer greater peace of mind. The decision hinges on personal thresholds for risk, tolerance for ongoing maintenance, and the value placed on the management teamā€™s willingness to act and improve.

The practical path forward is to visit with a precise checklist. Inspect a current unit for signs of pest activity and request the latest pest-control logs and inspection notes. Verify the smoking policy in the building and observe common areas during peak times. Speak directly with several residents about responsiveness and accountability of management, and ask for a concrete plan and timeline for completing outstanding improvements. Compare cost, included services, and potential need for assisted living supports down the line. If independence with active management and community connection tops the list, Cedars deserves a serious look; if the bed bug risk or smoke exposure is unacceptable, itā€™s wise to pursue options with more rigorous pest control histories and tighter rule enforcement.