13106 North 53Rd Street, Tampa, FL 33617
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Murray Manor Of Tampa Costs & Pricing
Murray Manor of Tampa offers competitive pricing for its residents, reflecting a thoughtful approach to value within the context of local and state averages. For semi-private rooms, the facility charges $3,000 per month, which is lower than the Hillsborough County average of $3,096 and slightly below the Florida average of $3,009. Private rooms are priced at $3,500, aligning closely with both county and state figures - $3,384 and $3,699 respectively. Additionally, their one-bedroom units also come in at a rate of $3,500 per month, which is significantly more affordable than the county's average of $3,786 and Florida's average of $3,864. Overall, Murray Manor presents a compelling option for families seeking quality care without compromising on affordability.
| Floor plans | Murray Manor Of Tampa | Hillsborough County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $3,096 | $3,009 |
| Private | $3,500 | $3,384 | $3,699 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,500 | $3,786 | $3,864 |
Overall Review of Murray Manor Of Tampa
Pros
They are honest about their capacity.
The house offers three bedrooms for comfortable lodging.
The setup can accommodate up to six people with two people per room.
They have two caregivers, providing adequate support.
Cons
They could only take six people.
They only wanted people who were very sedentary.
There were three bedrooms and two people to a room, with only two caregivers.
If they had two or three active people, they wouldnât be able to handle it.
It wouldnât be a good fit for a loved one.
Review
Murray Manor Of Tampa is best suited for seniors who are extremely low-activity and comfortable in a very small, home-like setting. This is a six-resident, house-style operation with three bedrooms and two residents per room, staffed by a lean caregiving team. The arrangement appeals to families that prioritize a simple, transparent setup over the scale and pace of a larger facility. If independence is measured by a mild routine, minimal daily lifting, and a preference for intimate, almost âfamily-styleâ oversight, this community can deliver. Those seeking a traditional, multi-wing campus with extensive programming and a wide range of services should look elsewhere.
For families weighing options, itâs essential to recognize who may want to consider alternatives. Active seniors, or those with fluctuating mobility who require frequent hands-on assistance, will likely outgrow this setting quickly. Residents needing private rooms rather than shared space, or families wanting more robust programming, memory care options, or higher staff-to-resident ratios should explore other communities. In short, this is not a fit for anyone expecting a large-scale operation to accommodate complex needs or a bustling cadence of activities.
The primary pros here are the core advantages of a tiny, straightforward model. There is no pretense about capacity, the facility makes its limits clear, which helps families avoid misalignment and false expectations. The intimate size can translate into more regular caregiver contact and easier, more personal monitoring. For households prioritizing a warm, unobtrusive atmosphere over institutional formality, the setting can feel more predictable and manageable. In this light, transparency about capacity becomes a meaningful strength rather than a mere footnote.
Yet the main cons are equally concrete and hard to overlook. With only two caregivers for up to six residents and shared rooms (two residents per bedroom), staffing density can become a bottleneck in moments of higher need or unexpected care demands. The model inherently favors sedentary residents; once mobility or daily task support increases, the current staffing and space arrangement may struggle to keep pace. Privacy and comfort are also compromised by room sharing, which matters to many seniors and families who value personal autonomy as part of quality care.
How the pros offset, or fail to offset, the cons boils down to fit. For the right resident, someone who thrives on a calm, predictable routine in a small, closely supervised home, the honest capacity and intimate environment can compensate for the lack of scale. Caregivers often establish stronger personal rapport when serving a tiny group, which can translate into more attentive day-to-day supervision within the limits of the staffing ratio. However, when care needs evolve or activity expectations rise, the same strengths become limitations, making the decision a matter of whether expected needs will stay consistently low.
When evaluating Murray Manor, the decision hinges on matched needs and realistic expectations. If a loved one requires only minimal assistance and values a homelike, transparent setting, this community can deliver comfort and steady companionship in a way larger facilities may not. Conversely, if upcoming care needs include frequent mobilization support, private accommodations, or robust programming, alternatives with higher staffing levels and more comprehensive services are prudent. Prospective families should insist on seeing room layouts, confirming current resident profiles, and discussing exact shift patterns with the caregiver team. A candid review of anticipated care trajectories will reveal whether this intimate house is a permanent home or a temporary hold until a more suited community is found.










Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies
Comprehensive Guide to VA Nursing Homes: A Crucial Long-Term Care Resource for Veterans