Chelten Place Apartments in Philadelphia, PA

Pros

• They were impressed by the overall quietness of the building.
• The units were very clean and always smelled fresh.
• The staff was pleasant, with Nikki and Sammy seen as assets to the property.
• The apartment was beautiful and luxurious, and maintenance issues were handled almost immediately.
• The agents were very helpful.

Cons

• There is no heat and management is not responding to residents.
• The move-in day involved being placed in a smaller moldy basement unit while paying the same rent.
• A bike was stolen from the front porch after management assured there were no crimes in the building.
• Management allegedly knew of multiple prior thefts but did nothing about them.
• Neighbors' cigarette smoke permeated walls and management did nothing to address it.
• A bat appeared in the building and maintenance did nothing.
• The neighborhood is described as dangerous, with a nearby shooting and a building fire that left residents waiting in the lobby.
• The heating failures in winter were severe, with heaters stopping, poor insulation, and unresponsive maintenance.
• The lease was terminated early due to smoke odor affecting asthma, and a partial refund was not offered.

Review

Chelten Place Apartments is best suited for renters who want a polished, clean interior and relatively quiet living, plus easy access to transit, and who can tolerate uneven management and local safety concerns. The units themselves are repeatedly described as well-kept, with some reviewers calling maintenance responsiveness commendable when it works. The building’s location near Chelten Avenue and nearby bus lines and trains makes it a practical choice for someone who commutes or needs frequent city access. For a tenant who prizes a pleasant, almost upscale apartment feel in a city pocket that’s easy to navigate, Chelten Place can feel like a solid fit, provided there is a willingness to overlook ongoing management gaps and neighborhood risk signals.

Those weighing Chelten Place against alternatives should pause if reliable heat, consistent emergency response, and predictable safety are non-negotiables. Several reviews depict a pattern of slow or missing responses to urgent maintenance, including prolonged heating failures, broken toilets without timely remedies, and a general sense that urgent issues are not prioritized. If peace of mind hinges on a landlord that can be trusted to address problems swiftly, or if the resident’s health or daily routine depends on dependable warmth in winter, alternatives with proven response times and stronger accountability are worth considering. Prospective residents who must feel secure about the surrounding area, given distinct mentions of crime and encroaching hazards, should compare safer neighborhoods and more transparent property management.

On the positive side, the consistently clean units and the presence of attentive staff in some reviews stand out as meaningful advantages. A few tenants credit the property with quiet surroundings and pleasant front-desk or management personnel, noting maintenance requests that are resolved promptly when staffing aligns. The aesthetic appeal of the apartments, described as beautiful and even luxurious by some, and the sense that maintenance can be proactive in certain situations, create a credible pull for tenants who value first impressions and a tidy living space. The blend of cleanliness, helpful individuals on site, and the accessibility of transit creates a usable baseline that makes Chelten Place feel like a viable home for the right person.

However, the most persistent and documented drawbacks are difficult to overlook. Heat instability in winter, frequent outages, inadequate insulation, and in one case an apartment stuck at frigid temperatures, directly undermines comfort and health. Long-term reliability of essential systems is repeatedly questioned, with reports of weeks of unresolved issues and a lack of timely outreach from management. Security concerns color several narratives, from reported thefts to unsettling hallway incidents and the perception of an unsafe neighborhood adjacent to the property. The building’s age compounds these problems, with aging infrastructure contributing to drafts, inconsistent climate control, and a sense that the property is not evolving quickly enough to meet modern expectations. Taken together, these factors tilt the risk-reward balance toward caution.

In weighing the pros against the cons, the decisive factor hinges on whether the positive elements can adequately counterbalance the reliability and safety shortfalls. The clean, well-kept interiors, courteous staff, and occasional maintenance momentum offer tangible value to tenants who can absorb the risk of inconsistent service and safety concerns. Yet for anyone with a heavy need for reliable heat, predictable emergency response, or a stable surrounding environment, the negatives loom larger and cannot be dismissed. The “luxury” impression is real for some, but it must be weighed against repeated, well-documented episodes of disruption, intrusion, and neighborhood unease that do not align with the expectations of families or seniors seeking steadiness and peace of mind.

Practical next steps for families evaluating Chelten Place are concrete and essential. Visit at different times of day to observe how heat and noise behave, and ask for a tour during winter to gauge climate control firsthand. Seek precise commitments on emergency maintenance response times, and request copies of any service-level agreements or maintenance logs to verify consistency. Probe the lease for terms around refunds or credits if core systems remain malfunctioning, and ask for recent capital improvements or plan timelines that address aging infrastructure. Speak with current residents about their experiences with management during high-demand periods and weather events. Finally, compare Chelten Place to other East Falls–Germantown options with stronger safety profiles, clearer management accountability, and proven warmth reliability to ensure a decision that prioritizes health, security, and long-term comfort.

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.6 miles)
• Dalessandro's Steaks (1.3 miles)
• Custard & Cakes Creamery (1.5 miles)
• McDonald's (2.2 miles)
• Pizza Hut (3.1 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (3.3 miles)
• Larry's Steaks (3.6 miles)

Transportation

• Septa Wayne Junction Station (1.3 miles)
• Stenton Station (2.1 miles)
• SEPTA Jenkintown-Wyncote Station (4.9 miles)
• 30th Street Station (5.1 miles)
• SEPTA: MFL/TRL 30th Street Station (5.2 miles)
• Jefferson Station (5.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (1.3 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.5 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.6 miles)
• Walgreens (1.9 miles)
• Rite Aid (2.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.7 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1.7 miles)
• The Landing Kitchen (2 miles)
• Pilgrim Roasters (2.1 miles)
• Panera Bread (2.1 miles)
• Starbucks (2.3 miles)
• Starbucks (2.9 miles)
• Starbucks (3.6 miles)

Physicians

• Simms Hank Md Albert Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia (2 miles)
• Frankford Avenue Health Center (5.2 miles)
• Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (5.6 miles)
• CHOP Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care - Raymond G. Perelman Campus (5.7 miles)

Hospitals

• Albert Einstein Employee Health Center (2.2 miles)
• Temple University Hospital (2.4 miles)
• St Christopher's Hospital for Children (3.4 miles)
• Chestnut Hill Emergency Room (3.9 miles)
• Episcopal Hospital (3.9 miles)
• Lankenau Medical Center (5.1 miles)
• Aria Health (5.3 miles)

Parks

• Fairmount Park (3.3 miles)
• Palmer Doggie Depot (4.5 miles)
• Palmer Park Farmers Market (4.6 miles)
• Piazza Dog Park (4.9 miles)
• Womrath Park (5 miles)
• Franklin Square (5.4 miles)
• Rittenhouse Square (5.6 miles)