Five Seasons Mobile Home Ests

Pros

• Brittaney was amazing, she made the whole process simple and quick, plus great communication.
• The service around is the best, with excellent employees and excellent products.
• It is a nice, homey place.
• Beautiful community!
• The park was very clean and the staff was helpful.
• There is a nice pool and a playground for the kids, and they even furnished life jackets.
• It is starting to be a better community.
• The staff is very professional.

Cons

• Racism and harassment of residents and visitors are reported, with the office allegedly ignoring or dismissing incidents.
• A 9-year-old was chased while being called racial slurs, and management is described as failing to protect or respond appropriately.
• Management is portrayed as overbearing, unresponsive, and slow to fix maintenance issues.
• New ownership is criticized for raising rents and not maintaining facilities (dilapidated playground and damaged property).
• Applicants claim poor communication and possible fee extraction, with applications ignored for weeks.
• Fines and strict rules (e.g., $60 for feeding stray cats) are seen as harsh and unfair.
• The park is described as dirty and run-down, with unrepaired damage after events and an unsafe overall environment.
• Vehicle towing practices without warning and a general lack of basic customer service are criticized.

Review

A chorus of residents paints a complicated and often troubling portrait of this mobile home park. On one hand, there are mentions of a community that can feel welcoming at times, with a few staff members praised for friendliness and efficiency. On the other hand, a large share of feedback centers on safety concerns, discriminatory behavior, confusing or unresponsive management, and a sense that the park has deteriorated since new ownership took over. Taken together, the comments reveal a pattern of strong emotions and real grievances that span daily living, safety, and financial fairness.

Several reviewers describe a hostile and unsafe environment for children. A number of accounts claim racial hostility, with a 9-year-old being chased while using the park and subjected to the n-word by an adult who was armed with a beer and a metal pole. The response from park officials is described in alarming terms: workers allegedly dismissed the incident, telling the parent that the adult could "say whatever he wants" and that the child should not have taken a shortcut. Complaints extend to alleged denial of video footage and disrespectful behavior from office staff during inquiries about what happened. The consistency of these themes has left some families feeling that the park is not safe for kids, with ongoing instances where children are allegedly chased or harassed and where the office staff's handling of issues appears inadequate or biased to them.

Beyond safety, residents describe pervasive management and organizational problems. Several reviews claim a pattern of unresponsiveness and bureaucratic obstruction, including applicants who were left without communication for weeks after applying for housing and fees that were not clearly accounted for. One wrestlered thread highlights a specific employee, Brittaney, who is praised for making the application process simpler and more communicative, suggesting that there can be moments of effective service amid broader dysfunction. But the bulk of feedback about management focuses on a sense of mismanagement: the park's leadership is described as unreliable, slow to address concerns, and overly aggressive in enforcing rules that, in some cases, are viewed as unfair or inconsistently applied.

Financial concerns and leasing practices emerge as another dominant theme. Reviewers speak of new ownership that has raised lot rents, with some saying the increases have outpaced what residents can reasonably absorb. There are mentions of a shift to month-to-month fees and a perception that the park prioritizes fees over the wellbeing of tenants. A few reflections underscore the impression that the park's rules - such as a proposed $60 charge for feeding stray cats and strict enforcement of lawn and pet codes - are used to extract extra money rather than to improve living conditions. Some tenants also report confusion over leases and renewal terms, including references to being charged for services or repairs that were not completed, and to a general sense that the financial relationship between residents and management is opaque or unfair.

Maintenance, utilities, and infrastructure are recurrent points of contention as well. The park's amenities and housing stock are described as uneven, with some homes in reasonably good condition and others described as run-down. A derecho's damage left visible scars on the community, and improvements have been slow or inconsistent, contributing to a perception that the park has not been properly repaired post-storm. In the same vein, there are complaints about heating problems and emergency lines that don't connect to the right people, leaving residents with the sense that urgent problems are not resolved promptly. The playground is noted as dilapidated in some reviews, juxtaposed with other days when families recount enjoying a pool or playground and a sense of community.

Personal experiences with staff run a wide spectrum. Some reviewers portray park personnel as professional, courteous, and helpful, noting excellent service and supportive team members who respond well to concerns. Other posts describe staff as rude, uneducated, and unresponsive, portraying a management culture that is punitive or petty - going as far as to claim that tenants are treated like outsiders or targets for fines and reprimands over minor infractions. In the most charged moments, residents accuse the park of tolerating discrimination, denying basic rights, or harassing tenants as a means to enforce compliance. The truth, as reflected in the mixed experiences, seems to depend heavily on which staff member you encounter and when you visit the office.

The park's transition under new ownership appears as a turning point in many accounts. A portion of residents acknowledge the change in ownership, with some expressing cautious optimism that new leadership could bring improvement, while others insist that the new regime has already made the park worse. Several reviews note ongoing, frustrating dynamics - fees, selective enforcement of rules, and inconsistent maintenance - that have left long-time residents disillusioned. Even among positive notes, there is a recognition that experiences vary: "new owners now. Hopefully they'll be good," and "the best service around" sit alongside warnings that the property has become more demanding and less affordable since the ownership change. The overall sentiment suggests a community in flux, with residents trying to navigate a landscape of elevated expectations, higher costs, and inconsistent service.

In the end, the picture emerging from these perspectives is of a park that holds potential for community and convenience but is presently marred by significant, overlapping concerns. Safety risks and experiences of racial hostility have a profound impact on families with children. Management practices and communication gaps contribute to a sense of opacity and mistrust, while financial pressures and enforcement of rules add an almost chronic strain on daily life. While there are occasional voices of praise - some staff members who deliver helpful and considerate service, or residents who find parts of the park comfortable and enjoyable - the prevailing narrative emphasizes the need for fundamental improvements in safety, fairness, and upkeep if the community is to move toward a more stable and welcoming future.

This part of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, offers a variety of amenities and services that cater to senior living needs. There are several physicians and pharmacies within close proximity for easy access to medical care and prescriptions. Additionally, the presence of hospitals such as Hiawatha Care Center and UnityPoint | St Lukes Cedar Rapids ensures that healthcare services are readily available. The area also boasts a range of dining options, from casual fast-food restaurants to more upscale establishments like Casa Las Glorias and Vito's On 42nd, providing diverse culinary experiences. Parks like Guthridge Park offer opportunities for outdoor recreation and relaxation, while places of worship such as Good Shepherd Lutheran Parsonage cater to spiritual needs. Overall, this part of Cedar Rapids provides a convenient and well-rounded environment for senior living.

Physicians

• Heartland Hearing Center (0.1 miles)
• Mercycare Community Physicians (0.3 miles)
• Wolfe Eye Clinic (0.7 miles)
• Dwight Schroeder, MD (0.8 miles)
• Unity Point Clinic Northridge (0.8 miles)
• Metropolitan Family Clinic (1 miles)
• St Luke's Physicians & Clinics (1.1 miles)

Pharmacies

• Blairs Ferry Family Pharmacy (0.3 miles)
• Niedermann Pharmacy (0.3 miles)
• Clark's Pharmacy (1.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.6 miles)
• Lil' Drug Store Products (2 miles)
• Thrive Spine And Sport (2.2 miles)
• Rockwell Collins Pharmacy (2.2 miles)

Restaurants

• Zeppelins Bar And Grill (0.5 miles)
• Freddy's Frozen Custard & Steakburgers (0.5 miles)
• Arby's (0.5 miles)
• McDonald's (0.5 miles)
• Casa Las Glorias (0.9 miles)
• Vito's On 42nd (0.9 miles)
• Culver's (1.1 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.6 miles)
• Dry Creek Brew at 100 Main (3 miles)
• Starbucks (3.8 miles)

Hospitals

• Hiawatha Care Center (0.7 miles)
• Sedlacek Treatment Center (2.2 miles)
• UnityPoint | St Lukes Cedar Rapids (3.7 miles)
• St Luke's Hospital 5C (3.7 miles)

Parks

• Guthridge Park (0.7 miles)
• East Knoll Park (3.7 miles)

Places of Worship

• Good Shepherd Lutheran Parsonage (0.9 miles)

Theaters

• Marcus Theatres (1.9 miles)
• Collins Road Theatres (3.5 miles)