2125 Park Ave, Snohomish, WA 98290
To contact a resident: (425) 263-0531
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Around the World Costs & Pricing
When assessing the monthly costs for Around the World compared to Snohomish County and the broader state of Washington, it becomes evident that Around the World positions itself at a higher price point. For semi-private rooms, Around the World charges $4,500, which is slightly above Snohomish County's rate of $4,320 and the state's average of $4,267. The disparity is even more pronounced for private rooms; while Around the World lists a fee of $6,000 per month, Snohomish County and Washington state offer more economical options at $4,834 and $4,772 respectively. These figures suggest that while residents may expect exceptional services or amenities at Around the World to justify its costs, they are faced with considerably lower alternatives in both county and state averages.
| Floor plans | Around the World | Snohomish County | Washington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,500 | $4,320 | $4,272 |
| Private | $6,000 | $4,834 | $4,774 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Around the World
Pros
The owner is very caring and concerned; she notices even small details about residents and relays them to families.
The staff have very good communication.
Residents enjoy the food.
It is a very comfortable, homey place that fits residents' needs.
It is bright, colorful, and a cheerful place.
The staff clearly has residents' best interests at heart.
They were very caring and comforting when a resident had to leave.
Cons
They were only there for a short time.
It was unfortunate that their stay was shorter than expected.
They had expected their mother to stay longer than she actually did.
Review
Around the World in Snohomish is best for families seeking a small, home-like setting where a dedicated owner-manager delivers highly personalized senior care. The reviews consistently spotlight hands-on attentiveness: the owner notices minor changes in a residentâs condition and promptly communicates them to family, yielding clear, trustworthy updates. The environment is described as bright and cheerful, with a comfortable, non-institutional feel, spaces that feel more like a residence than a facility. Nutritional quality stands out, with residents enjoying their meals. For elders who thrive on consistent, compassionate oversight and a warm, personal touch, this community is precisely where they should be considered.
Those who should consider alternatives are families prioritizing scale, formal programming, or intensive medical oversight. If a resident requires 24/7 skilled nursing, comprehensive memory-care features, or a bustling activity calendar that larger campuses typically provide, a bigger assisted-living community may be a better match. The one-star review hints at potential gaps that could exist in a smaller operation, and several families may want more data about staffing, day-to-day routines, or long-term viability before committing. In short, this is not a one-size-fits-all solution; it shines where personalization matters most, but may not satisfy needs tied to a more structured, larger program.
Key advantages center on relationship-driven care. The ownerâs visible investment translates into rapid, reliable communication, with updates that feel timely and specific rather than routine. Residents benefit from a homey ambiance and bright, colorful surroundings that contribute to mood and comfort. Food quality is consistently cited as a positive, an important factor for daily quality of life. Most importantly, the staffâs approach appears genuinely aligned with residentsâ best interests, particularly when hospice or end-of-life support is part of the care plan, as reflected in praise for its compassionate, supportive conduct during difficult transitions.
Nevertheless, the limited size and scope bring certain limitations. The reviews lean heavily on short stays and personal impressions, which means there is less clarity about staffing ratios, formal activity programming, or how emergencies are handled on a typical day. One reviewerâs one-star rating signals that experiences can diverge, and families should probe for specifics during tours, how many caregivers per shift, who administers medications, and what the daily schedule looks like. These gaps do not negate the warmth and reliability described, but they do represent potential trade-offs when time, pace, and predictability matter as much as kindness.
Pros and cons balance in favor of around-the-clock peace of mind for many families. The highly personalized, caregiver-led approach mitigates worries about impersonal care and communication gaps, and the strong alignment with hospice teams enhances comfort at end-of-life moments. The downside, less transparency about operations, smaller staff footprint, and fewer large-scale amenities, means this setting works best as a transitional or short-term placement or for residents who prize relationship-based care over formal programming. For those who need robust clinical oversight or activity-rich days, the benefits may not fully offset the trade-offs.
Bottom line: Around the World offers a compelling, practical option for families prioritizing warmth, direct caregiver access, and a cheerful, home-like atmosphere. It is particularly well-suited for residents who value strong communication and end-of-life support coordination, or who are seeking a comfortable bridge during transitions. Families should consider alternatives if scale, formal programming, ongoing skilled nursing, or extensive social activities are non-negotiables. When toured with questions about staffing, daily routines, and long-term plans, this community can be a thoughtful, effective choice for the right person at the right moment.











Highly Beneficial Low-Impact Exercises for Senior Living Residents
Is In-Home Healthcare Tax Deductible? Your Comprehensive Guide
Nurturing Well-Being Through Gardening: A Detailed Guide for Senior Enthusiasts