Fields Senior Living at Smokey Point Costs & Pricing
Fields Senior Living at Smokey Point offers competitive pricing for assisted living accommodations compared to both Snohomish County and the broader Washington state averages. The monthly cost for a studio apartment is $3,400, significantly lower than the county average of $4,443 and the state average of $4,126. Similarly, the one-bedroom units are priced at $3,900, which not only undercuts Snohomish County's average of $5,080 but also remains below Washington state's average of $4,632. However, the semi-private rooms are priced at $5,400, exceeding both the county's cost of $4,320 and the state's average of $4,267. Overall, Fields Senior Living at Smokey Point presents an attractive option for residents seeking quality care and affordability in their living arrangements.
| Floor plans | Fields Senior Living at Smokey Point | Snohomish County | Washington |
|---|
| Studio | $3,400 | $4,443 | $4,128 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,900 | $5,080 | $4,634 |
| Semi-Private | $5,400 | $4,320 | $4,272 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$500 / mo
Cascade Valley
$3,900 to $5,810 / month
6.4 miles away
-
from -$400 / mo
Precious Adult Family Home LLC
$3,000 / month
24.2 miles away
-
from -$155 / mo
Washington Oakes
$3,245 to $4,670 / month
16.6 miles away
-
from +$481 / mo
The Gardens at Marysville
$3,881 to $5,630 / month
11.0 miles away
-
from +$650 / mo
Brookdale Stanwood
$4,050 to $5,985 / month
16.7 miles away
Overall Review of Fields Senior Living at Smokey Point
common
28 reviews mention this
Staff care and responsiveness stand out
Residents describe staff members who are consistently friendly and attentive.
Across many reviews, residents and families talk about staff who are welcoming, patient, and responsiveâwhether it is helping with personal needs, adjusting to special situations, or simply making visits feel comfortable. Several reviewers also mention specific support around higher-needs care, describing staff who go out of their way to ensure help is provided. Even some mixed reviews still note strong care from the frontline team, while criticism focuses more on management or operations.
common
22 reviews mention this
Clean, bright, well-kept setting
Residents consistently describe a clean, well-maintained community with inviting common spaces.
Multiple reviews emphasize the facilityâs appearanceâclean, modern, and cared forâalong with bright common areas and well-kept rooms. Families also mention the overall atmosphere feels comfortable and welcoming, with seating areas and gathering spaces that make it easier to visit and socialize. A few reviewers contrast that strong look with moments that felt empty or poorly organized during their tour, but the majority of comments return to cleanliness and presentation.
common
12 reviews mention this
Restaurant-style dining and variety
Dining is often described as varied and satisfying, with restaurant-style service for residents.
Many reviews describe the meals as a strength, calling out variety and good taste, and some describe hot, well-prepared food. At least one reviewer specifically describes restaurant-style dining with a menu and order check. A minority of reviews raise concerns about food consistencyâsuch as meals served poorly, running out mid-meal, or food quality being lowâwhich is the main drawback to factor in.
common
10 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Residents describe frequent activities and events that offer daily options.
Reviews frequently mention an activities calendar with games, fitness classes, and planned events that residents can choose to participate in. Families also describe holiday gatherings and special community events that help relatives spend time together. Some mixed feedback points out gapsâlike fewer activities on weekends or limited programmingâbut overall reviews suggest engagement is a regular part of life here.
differentiator
7 reviews mention this
Care support includes nursing coverage
Residents describe nursing availability designed to support changing needs.
Several reviewers talk about care coverage for residents who need assistance beyond day-to-day routines, including help after a stroke and ongoing support for people with health challenges. One tour-focused review mentions RN/LPN availability during business hours and being on call 24/7, which aligns with the communityâs listed diabetic and ambulatory care services. While the care orientation is widely praised, a few critical reviews raise concerns about staffing stability and continuity that may affect the experience.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Concerns about cost, food, and consistency
Some reviews call out problems with value, food consistency, and day-to-day operations.
A few reviewers describe the community as expensive and note that the experience does not always match expectations for value. Food is also a recurring point in negative feedback, including accounts of meals served poorly or not being available as expected. There are additional concerns about communicationâsuch as families feeling unable to raise issuesâand staffing turnover, which shows up as a stability concern in some reviews.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.