Dubols Inc

Pros

• Delonte was amazing; he gave a great tour and answered all questions.
• The staff were very helpful and always reachable, and guests stayed for over two years and enjoyed their stay.
• The experience here was positive.
• Residents loved living there; the location is fantastic, the staff were always friendly, and the amenities were well maintained.
• The area is safe and quiet, with restaurants within a short walk and friendly staff.
• Meredith was great and a saving grace to the experience.
• Maintenance and security were helpful, with Ed and the team praised.
• The studios are ideal for someone living alone and wanting furnished accommodations.

Cons

• Delonte is described as the rudest leasing agent the reviewer has spoken to.
• The building's latch entry system malfunctioned, letting an intoxicated person enter the apartment.
• Management interrogated the reviewer and implied they left the door open.
• The front desk staff were rude, and a tour was canceled without in-person communication.
• Theft is common and management does nothing to address it.
• The security deposit was not returned for months despite multiple inquiries.
• Cockroaches are pervasive; the common areas are dirty, and the courtyard is trash-filled with homeless nearby.
• Management mishandled a roommate issue, ignored drug use and an abandoned cat, and left cat poop in the common areas.
• Co-living spaces have non-lockable doors, no private space, thin walls, and no open windows; viewing prior to move-in is not allowed.
• Rooms are small and dirty, with flies, no windows, and shared bathrooms; the price is not justified.
• Locks are entirely electronic with no physical keys, raising concerns about access and lockouts.
• Rent increases dramatically at renewal, and upfront payments plus deposits not returned are described as unfair.

Review

What emerges from these accounts is a highly mixed picture of living in Common properties in the DC/DMV area. Some residents describe the community as having great location, convenient furnished options, and responsive staff at times, while others recount alarming safety scares, chronic maintenance failures, and frustrating, if not combative, management experiences. Taken together, the reviews reveal a pattern of strong contrasts: convenience and design on one hand, and serious, ongoing operational and safety problems on the other.

Safety and security are prominent concerns across multiple reviews. One tenant recounts a terrifying incident where an entry-system failure allowed a drunken man - someone who should not have had access - into their apartment, and the fear of waking up with a stranger standing over them is described in stark terms. Others flag broader security and privacy issues linked to the co-living setup: locks that don't behave like private residences, doors that feel like they could be pushed open, and a general sense that the building's safety controls are not consistently reliable. Several reviewers mention theft and unwanted intrusions despite camera coverage, and at least one account asserts that management does little to address such incidents once they're reported. The combination of electronic access through an app (Latch) and the lack of a secure, private space for residents in co-living arrangements contributes to the anxiety many residents express about their personal safety inside the building.

Management and customer service surface as another major fault line. A recurring criticism is a perceived lack of accountability and poor communication: front-desk staff described as rude, tour coordinators who cancel appointments without personal in-person interaction, and management that interrogates tenants over routine issues (for example, insinuating the tenant left doors open). Several reviewers describe feeling unheard or even blamed when problems occur, with some reporting outsourced call centers that delay or mismanage requests. The tone across several posts suggests a pattern of slow or evasive responses to complaints, inconsistent follow-through, and a general sense that renters are not treated as valued customers. There are also complaints about the way deposits and move-out charges are handled, including long delays in returning security deposits and disputes over "prepaid" rent and late-fee assessments that some feel are unfair or misapplied.

The condition of the buildings themselves is described in blunt terms by multiple tenants. Pests are a persistent problem - cockroaches appearing repeatedly despite treatments. Outdoor areas and courtyards are described as neglected, with trash and even homeless individuals occupying spaces around the property in some reviews. Interiors aren't spared: some rooms are reported as dirty on move-in, others are described as musty due to lack of windows, and shared spaces are criticized for being dirty or poorly maintained. There are also vivid reports of unaddressed cleanliness and maintenance issues, including abandoned pets and cat waste in common areas, and ongoing repairs not clearly resolved within a reasonable time frame. In short, what should be a homey, well-maintained living environment is portrayed in several reviews as dirty, cramped, and sometimes unsafe.

Financial terms and lease design contribute to a sense of frustration as well. Several reviews mention paying upfront for rent and utilities, with complaints about deposits not being returned after moves out. One review specifically notes a dramatic rent increase from 2,165 to 2,675 per month upon renewal for a small 300-square-foot space, and others describe delayed refunds or the perception that the company pockets money through various charges. The formalities of the contract - described by some as a lengthy, onerous document with terms that are difficult to parse - are another point of contention. A recurring wish is for clearer disclosures and timely, fair handling of deposits and move-out credits, but the reality described is one of entangling bureaucracy and inconsistent enforcement of contractual terms.

The co-living model itself is a central thread in the discourse. Several reviewers praise the basic concept of co-living - shared spaces offered at a lower cost and the option to rent furnished units with flexible terms. Yet the execution of co-living is widely questioned. Reviewers point out that there is little to no private space, with lockable doors either lacking or not functioning in the way traditional tenants expect. The lack of windows in some rooms and the overall dorm-like atmosphere are repeatedly cited as major drawbacks. People note that viewing the space before moving in is not always possible, which leads to surprising and unhappy discoveries after the keys are in hand. The documented policies around guest limits, shared bathrooms, and how and when access to rooms is allowed add to the sense that co-living here is not a straightforward, private living arrangement but a high-occupancy environment demanding significant compromise. It's also noted that some internal processes - like moving from co-living to a private studio - can incur substantial fees, and that the door and access systems are not as simple or secure as one might expect.

Despite all of this, there are pockets of positivity. A few residents recount positive, constructive experiences with staff and management at times - Delonte, in particular, is named in one review as both a disappointment and, in another instance, "amazing" and helpful during a tour, answering questions and guiding the process. A tenant who stayed for two years describes the staff as very helpful and consistently reachable, suggesting that service quality can vary widely between individuals and moments. For some, the location, the convenience of the furnished units, and the overall concept of modern, flexible living offer enough appeal to overlook or tolerate the significant drawbacks. In these voices, you hear about areas like proximity to downtown DC, safe neighborhoods, nearby dining and services, and staff who are responsive when practical or when pressed to address problems.

Taken together, the narratives present a complex portrait. Common properties in this spectrum appear to offer a compelling blend of location, design, and short-term flexibility - traits many urban renters crave - yet the realities described in these reviews point to systemic concerns about safety, privacy, maintenance, and fair dealing with tenants. Potential renters should enter with clear expectations: understand exactly what the building's entry and security measures will look like, verify how deposits and move-out charges are handled, probe maintenance response times, and, crucially, seek recent, property-specific feedback rather than relying on a single positive thread. If you decide to pursue a stay in this model, go in with a careful checklist, insist on written confirmations for important policy assurances, and be prepared for a living experience that could be as rewarding as it is challenging.

This part of Arlington, Virginia, offers a convenient and vibrant urban environment with easy access to pharmacies, transportation options, restaurants, parks, cafes, physicians' offices, places of worship, theaters, and hospitals. The area is well-connected with multiple CVS and Walgreens pharmacies nearby for any medical needs. There are also several Metro stations within walking distance for convenient travel around the city. A variety of dining options ranging from fast food to upscale eateries are available in the vicinity. The numerous parks provide opportunities for outdoor activities and relaxation. Additionally, there are healthcare facilities like hospitals and physicians' offices in close proximity for any medical emergencies or routine check-ups. Overall, this area provides a diverse range of amenities that can cater to various needs and interests for seniors looking to settle down in Arlington.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.3 miles)
• Walgreens (2.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.5 miles)
• Walgreens (2.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.9 miles)

Transportation

• Crystal City Metro Station (0.3 miles)
• Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Metro Station (0.4 miles)
• American Airlines Admirals Club (0.5 miles)
• Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) (0.5 miles)
• Terminal 2 (0.5 miles)
• Delta Sky Club (0.5 miles)
• Terminal A (0.6 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.3 miles)
• Shake Shack (2.3 miles)
• The Salt Line (2.7 miles)
• Dacha Beer Garden (2.7 miles)
• McDonald's (2.7 miles)
• The Bullpen (2.8 miles)
• McDonald's (2.9 miles)

Parks

• Long Bridge Park (0.9 miles)
• Gravelly Point Park (1 miles)
• East Potomac Park (2 miles)
• Huntley Meadows Park (2.2 miles)
• West Potomac Park (2.4 miles)
• Southwest Duck Pond (2.4 miles)
• The Yards Park (3 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1 miles)
• Junction Bakery & Bistro (2.4 miles)
• Slipstream (3 miles)
• Philz Coffee (3.1 miles)
• Tatte Bakery & Cafe (3.2 miles)
• For Five Coffee (3.4 miles)
• Dolcezza (3.5 miles)

Physicians

• American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (2.4 miles)
• The Centers For Advanced Orthopaedics (3.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• St Peter's School on Capitol Hill (3.4 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Georgetown 14 (3.4 miles)
• Regal Gallery Place & 4DX (3.5 miles)

Hospitals

• St Elizabeths Hospital (3.4 miles)