116 Greene Street, Woonsocket, RI 02895
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Evergreen Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Evergreen Assisted Living offers competitive pricing for its services compared to the broader market in Providence County and the state of Rhode Island. With a monthly cost of $1,200 for a semi-private room, residents benefit significantly from an option that is substantially lower than the county average of $4,241 and the state average of $4,389. Similarly, the studio rooms at Evergreen are priced at $1,400, which is markedly below the county's average of $3,847 and the state's $4,015. This pricing structure not only makes Evergreen Assisted Living an attractive choice for individuals seeking quality care but also highlights its commitment to affordability in a sector often characterized by high costs.
| Floor plans | Evergreen Assisted Living | Providence County | Rhode Island |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,200 | $4,241 | $4,389 |
| Studio | $1,400 | $3,847 | $4,015 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Harbor Hill Place
$1,200 to $3,950 / month23.4 miles away
Overall Review of Evergreen Assisted Living
Pros
He is the number one friend in the whole wide world.- He is now in a place where people take care of him and ensure he showers regularly.
- The staff clean his room daily, which gives him a sense of well-being.
- Saving his life was the greatest thing done for him.
Cons
It deserves no stars at all.- There is a nurse named Suki who is combative to patients and staff.
- She threatens and intimidates staff and patients.
- Management knows that she does not belong being an RN.
- She is a lawsuit waiting to happen.
- She followed the reviewer down the patient hallway screaming and threatening them.
- The workers all leave because of this one nurse.
- Please do not put loved ones in this place; they will not be cared for properly or decently.
- People steal from you there.
- The friend’s apartment had a bed bug infestation, and health officials found it to be squalid.
- The friend’s apartment was always filthy, requiring daily cleaning by staff to compensate.
Review
Evergreen Assisted Living in Woonsocket is best suited for seniors who need steady daily assistance within a smaller, care-focused environment and for families willing to take an active advocacy role to ensure consistent, respectful care. The community appears to work best for residents who thrive on regular routines, visible staff presence, and a setting where daily tasks and hygiene are structured into the day. It is not a hands-off option; it rewards families who can stay engaged, ask questions, and push for prompt responses when concerns arise.
Those who should seriously consider alternatives are residents with higher-acuity needs or those who require unwavering staff reliability and proactive behavioral supervision. If a resident depends on consistently calm and professional caregiving, or has complex medical or behavioral needs requiring frequent, proactive oversight, Evergreen may fall short. Families with little bandwidth for ongoing monitoring or those who demand a proven track record of stable staffing and transparent leadership should compare other options more closely before committing.
The strongest positives in the mix are practical, day-to-day care elements: routine assistance with grooming and hygiene, and a cadence of daily housekeeping or room upkeep that signals an active effort to keep residents clean and comfortable. Anecdotal reports indicate that when a move to Evergreen occurs, residents can reach a level of daily care and attention, like regular showers and regular cleaning, that marks a meaningful improvement from prior living situations. Those practical aspects matter a great deal for families prioritizing basic quality-of-life improvements and predictable routines.
But the major red flags pull hard against those positives. A review highlights a single nurse whose behavior is described as combative and intimidating toward both patients and staff, with a suggestion that management is aware but insufficiently addressing the risk. The tone and behavior described raise serious questions about resident safety, staff morale, and the potential for conflicts to escalate. Add to that reports of theft and, in a prior context, concerns about cleanliness and pest problems, and the overall leadership culture and quality oversight come into question. When these elements appear, the risk of inconsistent care climbs, and trust in the facility’s ability to respond quickly to problems diminishes.
In weighing pros and cons, the balance tilts toward caution unless concrete corrective steps are evident. The day-to-day care benefits can be meaningful, but they are fragile when backed by unstable staffing and questionable supervisory follow-through. Families should not accept a best-case narrative; they should seek concrete assurances: up-to-date staffing assignments, transparent care planning, and a clear, accessible mechanism for reporting issues with timely escalation. Tours should focus on real-time interactions between caregivers and residents, cleanliness standards, and the visibility of an accountable administrator or director who owns and fixes problems.
For families committed to pursuing Evergreen, the path is practical and action-oriented. Ask for a candid meeting with the administrator to discuss staffing stability, background checks, and turnover. Request a current staffing schedule and a demonstration of how care plans are updated and communicated to families. Inspect common areas and resident rooms for cleanliness, odor, and general maintenance, and ask about incident reporting and follow-through. Verify that there is a transparent process for addressing grievances and a concrete plan for resolving any behavioral concerns with staff. These steps transform uncertainty into a trackable, controllable decision.
In the end, Evergreen Assisted Living presents a workable option for families who are prepared to be actively involved and to hold leadership to account, balancing the pragmatic benefits of daily care with the realities of staffing and governance. For those seeking a low-maintenance, highly predictable environment with minimal family oversight, it may be wiser to explore alternatives with stronger evidenced stability and more robust, proactive management. The right choice hinges on tolerance for advocacy, willingness to scrutinize staffing, and the confidence that any concerning behavior can be promptly resolved rather than tolerated.
29 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Activities on-site
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Theodore F Green State (20 miles away)
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide