6948 50 Torresdale Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19135
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Northeast Residence Costs & Pricing
The costs for residing in the Northeast Residence reflect a strategic pricing model that offers significant savings compared to both Philadelphia County and the broader state of Pennsylvania. At a monthly rate of $1,550 for a semi-private room, Northeast Residence stands out as an economically advantageous option, particularly when juxtaposed against the county's average of $3,662 and the state's average of $3,542. This pricing not only underscores the value of choosing Northeast Residence but also highlights its commitment to providing quality care at a more accessible price point in comparison to neighboring areas.
| Floor plans | Northeast Residence | Philadelphia County | Pennsylvania |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,550 | $3,662 | $3,542 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Northeast Residence
Cons
The facility never called them back.
They did not get an answer with the facility’s name when they called.
Kristine Kim was repeatedly said to be not in.
They were told Kristine was not in on multiple occasions and no one would call them back.
When they attempted a tour, no one was available and they were left to wait.
The visit showed about 20 people in a large house with no staff approaching them.
There was no one to talk to and no one would be there until Monday.
It appeared to be more of a halfway house than what they were seeking.
Review
Northeast Residence in Philadelphia is best suited for independent seniors who want a home-like atmosphere with minimal staff intervention and little structured programming. The property presents as a large house rather than a formal campus, which can feel comfortable to someone who does not require daily assistance or regular onboarding. For families whose loved one needs consistent supervision, medication management, or rapid, proactive help, this community is not a fit. The setting may appeal to those who prioritize a simple, low-key living arrangement over a high-touch care model.
Prospective residents who expect clear guidance, reliable scheduling, and readily available staff should look toward alternatives. Anyone evaluating options for ongoing care should avoid this community if the goal is dependable admissions support, transparent communication, and visible staffing. Those needing daily help, mobility assistance, fall prevention measures, or memory-care oversight, should not rely on Northeast Residence. In short, this option tends to work only for individuals who can carry the financial and logistical burden of navigating a very informal care environment.
The core red flags are explicit in the firsthand report: calls that go unanswered or are answered with bare “hello,” staff who cannot confirm the facility’s name or the presence of key contacts, and a tour that never materializes. The admission process appears disjointed, with a pattern of unreturned messages and uncertain availability. On arrival, there is little to no engagement from staff, and residents are observed in a large room without structured activity or visible care oversight. The kitchen contact reveals two workers, but no designated point person for inquiries or tours. The atmosphere suggests a setting that functions more like a halfway house than a formal assisted-living operation.
There are no meaningful pros in this account that offset the stated cons. The occasional notion of a homey, house-like space is outweighed by the absence of accountability, predictable staffing, and a responsive admissions process. Without a reliable contact, clear programming, and consistent resident support, the supposed comfort of a “large house” glosses over fundamental care deficiencies. In practical terms, any potential calm from a spacious, domestic feel evaporates when emergencies or routine needs fail to receive timely attention and guidance.
For families weighing options, the takeaway is concrete: pursue communities that can demonstrate proven staffing, defined supervision levels, and dependable communication. Start by confirming licensing and complaint history with state authorities, requesting a transparent daily schedule, and interviewing the administrator or director of admissions in person. Request a tour during a typical day to observe how staff interact with residents, how medication management is handled, and how safety needs are addressed. Ask for written admissions criteria, a current sample contract, and a clear fee structure with what is included and excluded. Talk to current residents or families about response times, care consistency, and transparency.
In the end, Northeast Residence should be approached with caution and usually avoided for anyone who requires reliable, proactive assisted living. The primary failure points, communication gaps, lack of accessibility to a named contact, and an absence of organized care, undermine the core purpose of an assisted-living arrangement. Families prioritizing dependable oversight, straightforward tours, and predictable service levels will find stronger reassurance elsewhere. The best path is to pursue communities with demonstrable staffing commitments, responsive admissions processes, and a clear, resident-centered programming that translates into tangible daily support.













How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities