414 Perry Road, Perryopolis, PA 15473
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Annalisa SA Touch Of Home Costs & Pricing
Annalisa SA Touch Of Home offers competitive pricing for its services compared to broader market rates in Fayette County and throughout Pennsylvania. For a semi-private room, residents can expect a monthly cost of $1,800, which is significantly lower than the county average of $2,862 and the state average of $3,542. Similarly, the studio accommodations are priced at $2,300 per month, well beneath the county's $3,117 and the state's $3,737 averages. This positioning not only reflects a commitment to affordability but also ensures that residents receive quality care without compromising on their financial wellbeing.
| Floor plans | Annalisa SA Touch Of Home | Fayette County | Pennsylvania |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,800 | $2,862 | $3,542 |
| Studio | $2,300 | $3,117 | $3,737 |
Overall Review of Annalisa SA Touch Of Home
Pros
The staff are caring and welcoming.
The owner is genuinely caring.
Angie and the staff are consistently kind.
The facility accommodates low-income families.
The staff are friendly and caring, and requests for help are promptly addressed.
It feels like a great country home away from home.
Cons
The facility is described as a horrible, unclean home.
Staff are said to care more about paychecks than resident care.
Residents are described as unclean and not cared for well.
Review
Annalisa SA Touch Of Home in Perryopolis, PA is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like setting with a hands-on owner and staff, especially when memory-care needs are present but do not require high-acuity medical oversight. The facility emphasizes a country-home atmosphere over clinical formality, and residents tend to benefit from intimate, person-centered attention. This community appeals to families who value accessible, compassionate caregiving and a budget-conscious approach, including flexibility for residents with limited financial resources. It is the right fit for those who prize routine, familiar faces, and a strong sense of belonging over polished institutional amenities.
The strongest positives are the personal connections and responsive leadership. Reviewers repeatedly highlight an owner who genuinely cares and staff who are consistently friendly and welcoming. Families report feeling heard and supported, with caregivers readily helping with daily needs and navigating common senior-care concerns. The ability to accept low-income residents without pressing for higher fees stands out as a practical advantage, making continued residence feasible for families with tighter budgets. In short, the human element, caregiver warmth, approachable leadership, and a family-like vibe, drives the overall experience.
Yet a single negative account cannot be ignored. One reviewer described an unclean home and suggested that employees were more focused on a paycheck than on resident welfare. In a small, home-style setting, such criticism points to potential gaps in housekeeping standards or consistency of care. While it may reflect an outlier, it is a meaningful signal that without diligent oversight and steady staffing, the resident experience can waver. Prospective families should prioritize an in-person assessment of cleanliness, daily routines, and how requests are handled to determine whether the current operations align with their expectations.
Despite this caveat, the community’s advantages often offset the concerns for the right resident. The warm, country-home atmosphere combined with active owner involvement offers a level of assurance that can be hard to find in larger facilities. For residents who thrive on personal attention and stable routines, and for families prioritizing affordability, staying in a homelike space rather than a more clinical setting can significantly enhance quality of life. Observing interactions during a visit, asking pointed questions about daily care, and reviewing recent resident outcomes help translate these intangible strengths into a concrete evaluation.
Alternatives become worth considering when certain priorities come into sharper focus. If meticulous cleanliness, consistent staffing, or more formal memory-care programming are non-negotiables, larger facilities or nonprofit providers with standardized protocols may better meet those standards. For families requiring stronger medical monitoring, clearly defined escalation processes, or more structured cognitive activities, a broader market search will likely be warranted. In a rural area, weigh travel time, visit frequency, and the facility’s ability to integrate with outside healthcare providers as practical factors that can influence overall satisfaction and continuity of care.
Bottom line: Annalisa SA Touch Of Home offers a practical, warm option for families prioritizing a homelike environment, personal attention, and budget-friendly care, especially for residents with dementia who benefit from intimate settings. Prospective residents should plan a visit, tour living spaces, and discuss care plans, fee structures, and how requests are handled in practice. If these elements align with expectations, the community warrants serious consideration. If the emphasis is on strict cleanliness standards, highly consistent care routines, or robust clinical oversight, it is prudent to continue exploring alternatives with stronger formal systems.








How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities