502 Church St, Athens, PA 18810
To contact a resident: (570) 888-5772
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Page Manor
Cons
The manager is described as not respecting the elderly or disabled.- The building is said to be run like a prison.
- The reviewer did not enjoy the attitude and conditions.
- The office staff are described as shocking.
- A 76-year-old grandmother was forced to move all of her belongings to another place so they could spray.
- The elderly resident faced a winter predicament with three pets and nowhere to go for hours, yet remained financially responsible for moving, storage, and transport.
- Page Manor workers are labeled a joke, and action is urged to address the issues.
- Questions about the apartment building are dismissed as stupid.
Review
Page Manor in Athens, PA is best suited for independently minded seniors who want a budget-friendly, apartment-style living option and can function without heavy staff oversight. The community is not a care-focused setting; it functions more like housing with limited daily assistance implied. For residents who can manage routines with minimal support and who value a straightforward, utilitarian setup, this may feel tolerable or economical. The expectation, however, is clear: don’t anticipate a high level of personal attention or proactive outreach from staff. Those needing regular caregiving, companionship, or strong advocacy should look elsewhere.
Explicitly, those evaluating alternatives include families with loved ones who require consistent empathy, respectful communication, and predictable routines. The most pointed feedback describes a manager who treats residents more like tenants than neighbors deserving courtesy. A winter pest-control spray led to a forced move of a resident’s belongings, with the resident held fully responsible for moving, storage, and logistics. Such incidents reveal potential gaps in resident welfare and protective oversight. If a resident has multiple pets or complex care needs, the risk of friction and unexpected costs rises markedly. In these circumstances, alternatives are prudent.
On the upside, a small fraction of reviews hints at a simpler, no-frills living environment and potentially lower costs, which may appeal to strictly independent residents. However, these narrow positives are overwhelmed by reports of disrespect, a restrictive, prison-like atmosphere, and abrupt administrative decisions that affect daily life. The supposed savings are undermined when services expected from a livable community, clear communication, dignity, and consistent policies, fall short. In practical terms, the few apparent advantages do not offset the core drawbacks centered on management conduct and the safety net around resident welfare.
Practical steps for evaluating this community include demanding explicit answers about the scope of services for independent residents, and the exact policies governing pest-control and any associated charges for moving or storing belongings. Clarify pet policies, especially during transitions, and verify how concerns are escalated and resolved. Request candid conversations with current residents about day-to-day interactions with staff, and arrange a trial visit to observe how staff respond to routine needs. If responses are vague or defensive, and if daily life still feels unsettled after a trial, explore other options with clearer communication and stronger resident advocacy.
Red flags to watch for include reported disrespect toward residents, a punitive atmosphere, and a lack of transparency around costs tied to basic services. The framing of the facility as merely an apartment building rather than a care-enabled community is a warning sign that caregiving expectations may be mismatched with resident needs. Questions to prioritize include consistency of staffing, timeliness of maintenance and care requests, and whether residents feel safe and respected. A pattern of friction or reluctance to accommodate reasonable requests signals that the value proposition is not robust enough to justify the risk.
Bottom line: Page Manor warrants cautious consideration. It may serve a niche of truly independent seniors who can tolerate limited staff support and a tenancy-focused culture, but for most families weighing assisted-living options the drawbacks are significant. If dignity, proactive care, and transparent, resident-centered policies matter, stronger alternatives deserve priority. The decision should rest on whether a loved one can flourish with minimal caregiving or whether a community with proven hospitality and clear, compassionate oversight is essential. In practical terms, Page Manor should be the last resort after visiting other options and confirming that a respectful, well-managed environment is unattainable elsewhere.
Assisted Living
Activities on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Elmira Corning Regional (23 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Meals provided
Convenient location with many nearby amenities.
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living