Oasis Adult Day Care Center in Sapulpa, OK

Pros

• Oasis is a loving, compassionate, family-centered place for beloved family members.
• The staff are amazing and truly care for their clients.
• It is a nice facility with wonderful and kind workers.
• Oasis provides a daily schedule with lots of fun activities and frequent live musical acts.
• There is a good mix of Alzheimer's and developmentally delayed adults, which helps stimulate everyone.
• They offer occasional field trips for participants who are able.
• Oasis in Sapulpa is a highly recommended quality day center for loved ones.

Cons

• They claim Oasis left owing $75,000 at a second location and promised to pay, which they did not fulfill.
• They state the bank would not honor any of Oasis's checks, and therefore they couldnā€™t honor the promissory note they signed.
• They say the service Oasis offers is too expensive.
• They allege that Kirk Schauer and Brian Elliott advocate dropping a loved one off and not paying for it, while promising to pay someday.

Review

Oasis Adult Day Care Center in Sapulpa, OK is best suited for families seeking a warm, human-centered day program that emphasizes social engagement and meaningful interaction for adults with memory challenges alongside younger adults with developmental delays. It works well for clients who respond to a homey atmosphere, steady, attentive staff, and a lively schedule of activities, including live music and occasional outings. For caregivers who want clear reassurance that their loved one is cared for with kindness, safety, and personal attention in a supportive community, Oasis delivers. Those requiring a more clinical setting, or a program with steady waiver eligibility and transparent, low-risk finances, may want to consider other options.

The strongest selling points center on the staff and the culture. Reviews repeatedly praise staff as amazing, caring, and genuinely devoted to their clients, creating a loving, family-centered environment where safety and individualized attention feel inherent to the day. The programā€™s structure, daily schedules, diverse activities, and frequent live performances, provides predictable routines that can reduce anxiety and encourage social participation. The mix of participants with Alzheimerā€™s and developmental delays is framed as a benefit, with participants stimulating each other and benefiting from shared activities, field trips, and a sense of belonging. In short, Oasis earns its reputation as a place where people are treated like family and kept engaged.

However, serious concerns temper the otherwise positive impression. The most consequential issues are financial in nature: a perception or report of nontransparent governance, including a claim that the organization dissolved and left outstanding financial obligations, which undermines confidence in long-term stability. The program is described as expensive, and it does not accept state waivers, which directly limits access for families relying on public assistance to manage day-program costs. Taken together, these factors create a calculus that weighs strong daily care and atmosphere against questions about fiscal continuity and affordability, especially for budget-conscious families or those depending on waivers to make enrollment viable.

These cons do not entirely erase the programā€™s advantages, but they do frame a clear boundary for decision-making. The quality of direct care and the cultivated, enjoyable atmosphere can offset some concerns if the loved one thrives on social immersion and familiar routines, and if finances are manageable without waivers. Yet the lack of waiver acceptance means more families must absorb out-of-pocket costs, and the reported financial instability raises legitimate questions about ongoing operations, billing clarity, and the reliability of administrative commitments. For families balancing safety, engagement, and cost, Oasis offers a strong experiential value, but only if the economic and governance uncertainties can be tolerated.

For families considering Oasis, proactive due diligence is essential. Seek current, direct answers about ownership, financial standing, and any pending obligations. Confirm whether waivers are expected to be accepted in the near future, and if not, what discounted or sliding-scale options exist. Request a transparent, itemized price structure, including what activities and transportation are included. Speak with multiple staff members and, if possible, visit during active programs to observe interactions and safety practices firsthand. Ask for references from current participants or families who can speak to continuity of care and responsiveness to concerns. Finally, compare Oasis against similarly rated programs that actively participate in waiver programs, maintain clear financial histories, and present a steadier governance track record.

Bottom line: Oasis is a compelling choice for families who prize warmth, personal attention, and social vitality in a day program, and who can afford the price and tolerate the governance ambiguities. It shines as a community where participants are cherished and engaged, with staff who truly care. It is less suitable for those who depend on waivers for access or who require strong assurances about financial stability and ongoing program viability. In the right circumstances, Oasis can be a transformative, enriching daily experience; in others, it warrants careful comparison with alternatives that offer more predictable financing and broader accessibility.