Atrium Centers, LLC

Pros

• The Frederic Nursing and Rehab Center had a wonderful Activities Director who knew all the residents by name and truly cared for them.
• The Activities Director did daily activities with the residents.
• She shopped for residents, often using her own money and then waiting to be reimbursed.
• The reviewer described the Activities Director as someone who genuinely cared for all the residents.

Cons

• The administrator fired the assistant activities director claiming affordability issues with a $500 referral bonus.
• The administrator then fired the activities director for alleged money misuse, despite no money-handling protocol being in place.
• Both individuals involved are described as being of nonwhite descent, implying a pattern of racial bias.
• The actions are said to reflect poorly on the facility and the corporation.
• The former Activities Director was denied unemployment based on a mean-spirited rationale given to the state.
• The reviewer would not use the facility's services, citing a staff member described as rude and nasty about reserved parking spaces.

Review

A troubling account has emerged from Frederic Nursing and Rehab Center in Frederic, Wisconsin, detailing a sequence of personnel changes that the author believes were driven not by performance but by discriminatory motives. At the center of the narrative is a beloved Activities Director who knew every resident by name, organized daily engagement for them, and even shopped for their needs - often spending her own money and waiting for reimbursement. The writer emphasizes that this person genuinely cared for the residents and contributed to a warm, resident-centered atmosphere that many families valued. The story portrays her as the heart of the facility's daily life and social engagement, and the abrupt loss of her leadership is portrayed as a hard break from that culture of personal attention and dedication.

The account assigns responsibility for the changes to Tammy Farmer, identified as the Center Administrator. According to the writer, the Assistant Activities Director was let go first with the stated reason that the facility could not afford a $500 referral bonus that was due to be paid out in three days. The sequence then shifted to the firing of the Activities Director herself, with accusations that she had misused money. The writer notes that there was no existing protocol for money handling at the facility, which, in their view, undermines the credibility of the accusation and raises questions about due process and fair treatment. A pattern is drawn by the author: both individuals who were let go were described as being of nonwhite descent, leading the writer to interpret these actions as part of a broader, troubling pattern rather than isolated incidents.

In the narrative, the administrator's alleged mismanagement is central to the critique. The claim is that paying a promised referral bonus, a straightforward financial obligation, should not have been a budgetary obstacle so easily invoked to justify removing staff. The writer frames the move as not just an internal personnel decision but as indicative of poor leadership and a lack of financial stewardship at the administrative level. The broader implication drawn by the author is that the incident reflects poorly on the entire facility and its corporate parent, suggesting systemic failings rather than a one-off lapse in judgment.

Furthermore, the reviewer alleges that the repercussion of these dismissals extended beyond internal morale and performance, reaching the unemployed status of the former Activities Director. The narrative states that she was denied unemployment benefits, with the state of Wisconsin providing an explanation that the author characterizes as cold and unkind. The writer notes that this matter has drawn attention from higher authorities, specifically the Wisconsin Attorney General and the Wisconsin Department of Labor, who are expected to hear about what is described as a "terrible injustice." The tone signals a call for accountability at the highest levels, with the author asserting that the case warrants scrutiny and intervention from state officials.

The piece closes with a sharp, public-facing condemnation. The writer urges shame on those perceived to be responsible, implying that the administration's actions are not only unjust to the individuals involved but also reflective of a broader ethical failure within the center and its governance. The author signals an ongoing pursuit of justice, including potential legal or regulatory remedies, as the matter moves toward formal review by state authorities. The overall message is one of protest against what is presented as discriminatory firing practices and a malfunctioning administrative regime that compromised both the dignity of dedicated staff and the welfare of residents.

A secondary thread in the narrative touches on a separate, more personal experience with the center's customer service culture. The writer recounts an encounter with a staff member described as a "blonde, dry-haired" woman who was reportedly rude about reserved parking spaces. This vignette is used to illustrate a broader impression of the staff's demeanor, reinforcing the writer's distrust and reluctance to rely on or recommend the facility. The sentiment is clear: the experience has left the author wary about the quality and tone of service, leading to a decision to take business elsewhere and to caution others about potential negative interactions with staff.

Taken together, the account presents a powerful indictment of Frederic Nursing and Rehab Center as it is experienced by the writer. It frames the center's leadership as negligent and discriminatory, particularly regarding staff who are described as nonwhite. It also highlights concerns about financial practices, unemployment outcomes, and the possible influence of racial bias on administrative decisions. The narrative culminates in a call for accountability and formal review by state authorities, alongside a personal warning about the character and behavior of some staff members. Whether this account reflects wider patterns at the facility remains a point of contention, but the emphasis is unmistakable: a demand for transparency, fairness, and a restoration of trust in the center's care and governance.

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.2 miles)
• Block's Bagels, Bakery & Deli (2 miles)
• McDonald's (2.2 miles)
• Royal Fish Shrimp & Chicken (2.6 miles)
• Chili's Too (2.7 miles)
• Eddie George's Grille (2.8 miles)
• The Top Steakhouse (3 miles)

Places of Worship

• Faith Ministries Church (1.9 miles)
• St Catharine Church (2.7 miles)
• Holy Name Church (3.8 miles)
• Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church (4.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Ohio State University Hospital East (2.4 miles)
• Nationwide Children's Hospital (3.8 miles)
• Select Specialty Hospital (4 miles)
• Richard M Ross Heart Hospital (4.4 miles)
• OSU Harding Hospital (4.5 miles)
• Mount Carmel East (5.1 miles)
• Ohio Health (5.3 miles)

Transportation

• John Glenn Columbus International Airport (CMH) (2.5 miles)
• Concourse C (2.6 miles)
• CMH Passenger Drop-off / Pick-up (2.6 miles)
• TSA Security Checkpoint A (2.7 miles)
• TSA Security Checkpoint B (2.7 miles)
• TSA Pre-Check B (2.8 miles)
• Concourse B (2.8 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (2.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.9 miles)
• Walgreens (3.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.1 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (2.8 miles)
• Starbucks (2.8 miles)
• Fox in the Snow Cafe (3.6 miles)
• Northstar Cafe (3.6 miles)
• Starbucks (4.8 miles)
• One Line Coffee (5 miles)

Physicians

• Equitas Health King-Lincoln Medical Center (3.3 miles)
• Nationwide Children's Hospital Livingston Ambulatory Center (4.2 miles)
• The Eye Center of Columbus (4.5 miles)
• Grant Family Medicine/Eastside Surgery Center (4.5 miles)
• Us Healthworks (4.6 miles)
• Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center (4.8 miles)
• Taylor Station Surgical Center (4.9 miles)

Theaters

• Dreamscape at AMC Easton Town Center (3.8 miles)

Parks

• Goodale Park (4.1 miles)
• John Bishop Memorial Park (4.2 miles)
• Scioto Mile - Promenade/Riverfront (4.6 miles)
• Schiller Park (5 miles)
• Whetstone Park / Park of Roses (5.4 miles)