935 Page Drive, Mount Pleasant, NC 28124
To contact a resident: (704) 436-2923
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Mt. Pleasant House Costs & Pricing
At Mt. Pleasant House, the monthly costs for accommodations are notably competitive when compared to both Stanly County and the broader state of North Carolina. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $2,400, which represents a significant savings over the county's average of $3,319 and the state's average of $3,584. Similarly, for a one-bedroom option, Mt. Pleasant House charges $3,400 - again more affordable than Stanly County's average of $4,688 and slightly higher than the state's average of $4,055. These pricing structures reflect our commitment to providing quality care and comfortable living arrangements without compromising financial accessibility for families seeking assisted living options.
| Floor plans | Mt. Pleasant House | Stanly County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,400 | $3,319 | $3,584 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,400 | $4,688 | $4,055 |
Overall Review of Mt. Pleasant House
Pros
The Mount Pleasant staff are pleasant and proficient, and they work as a team to provide services for people in need.- It has been an honor and a blessing at Mount Pleasant.
- They were very pleased with Mount Pleasant House; the staff were super nice; the living room is awesome, and they would recommend the facility to anyone seeking assisted living.
- They are moving in on August 14 and are looking forward to it.
- It is a wonderful community for loved ones.
- Mount Pleasant House is a nice community with friendly staff and lovely residents.
- The facility is wonderful and full of laughter and enjoyment every day, with many residents smiling and happy.
Cons
They reported that when they called, no one helped them.- They described the facility as the dirtiest they’ve ever seen and said it should be shut down, alleging their dad didn’t receive his medicine and their mom lay on the floor for more than 30 minutes waiting for help.
- The reviewer, a social worker, found interactions with the ALF far less than desirable, noting almost no communication from the administrator, unreturned calls, and rude treatment, including being addressed as "honey" and a lack of notice when transporting a patient.
- They would give zero stars if possible.
Review
Mt. Pleasant House in Mount Pleasant, NC is best pitched to seniors who want a warm, social, home-like assisted living environment where frontline staff drive daily life and where daily interactions and a sense of belonging matter as much as formal care protocols. The facility projects a bright, welcoming living room and a culture in which staff are described as pleasant, proficient, and collaborative. For families seeking a place with visible energy, approachable staff, and a community atmosphere, where residents mingle, laugh, and feel at home, this community offers a compelling, ready-to-live-in vibe that can make the transition smoother and more enjoyable.
That said, prospective residents and families should consider alternatives if medical oversight and operational reliability are non-negotiable. Several reviews flag gaps in consistency and communication that could translate into uncomfortable or unsafe situations. Notably, there are accounts of delays in care, including medications not being delivered and residents left waiting for help. There are also reports of administrative communication failures and a parameter-setting tone from leadership that raised concerns about responsiveness and professionalism. In short, for families prioritizing predictable, tightly run operations and transparent, timely communication, the contrast with Mt. Pleasant House warrants a careful comparative look.
On the upside, the strongest, repeatedly cited positives center on the human side of care. The majority of staff are described as genuinely pleasant, cooperative, and capable, with a teamwork ethos that enhances service delivery. Tour experiences have left prospective residents impressed by the warmth of the environment, the friendliness of the team, and the feeling that the community is really “home.” Several reviewers note genuine satisfaction among residents and a culture of laughter and engagement, suggesting that when operations are smoothly aligned, daily life can be upbeat and emotionally supportive. For families who want a facility where staff go the extra mile to create a welcoming social fabric, these advantages are meaningful.
The most troubling red flags revolve around care reliability and administrative conduct. Reports of medication gaps, a resident left on the floor waiting for assistance, and a lack of timely communication with outside professionals indicate a risk to resident safety that cannot be dismissed. Additional critiques about the administrator’s demeanor and unanticipated transportation pickups without notice point to a potential breakdown in trust and coordination. Cleanliness concerns also appear in at least one severely negative post, underscoring that basic standards must be verified in person. Taken together, these factors suggest that while the environment can be lively and supportive, the care and governance layer behind it needs stringent verification and ongoing oversight.
The key balancing act for families is whether the strong social and staff-staffed advantages can compensate for the operational fragility exposed in a handful of reviews. If the facility can demonstrate consistent, improved care processes, clear medication administration protocols, reliable response times, transparent communication with families and outside providers, and a heightened emphasis on cleanliness and safety, Mt. Pleasant House becomes a powerful value proposition for those prioritizing companionship and daily quality of life. However, until those assurances are present and verifiable, the question remains whether this community can deliver the dependable, around-the-clock care that some residents require without compromising trust.
In the end, Mt. Pleasant House should be on a short list for families who value a vibrant, people-centered environment and who are prepared to do more due diligence. Schedule a thorough site visit with an emphasis on red-flag checks: pose direct questions about medication passes and nurse supervision, request a copy of the latest state inspection and incident logs, observe call-response times during busy periods, and speak with current residents and their families about consistency of care. If the facility can provide documented improvements and a demonstrable plan for admin responsiveness, it becomes a strong option. If not, alternatives with a proven track record of medical oversight and seamless administrative operations deserve serious consideration.
74 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Activities off-site
Air-conditioning
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Handicap accessible
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Art classes
Concierge services
Day trips and outings
Live dance or theater performances
Live musical performances
Protestant services
Wii bowling
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit
