Concord House
Save
2339 Odell School Rd, Concord, NC 28027
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
At Concord House, residents can expect to find competitive monthly costs for both semi-private and one-bedroom accommodations. Specifically, the cost for a semi-private room is $1,900, significantly lower than the average rates in Cabarrus County at $3,167 and North Carolina state average of $3,584. For those interested in a one-bedroom option, Concord House charges $2,500 per month, also presenting a more budget-friendly alternative compared to Cabarrus County's average of $4,357 and North Carolina's statewide average of $4,055. This pricing structure reflects Concord House's commitment to providing quality living arrangements that are not only comfortable but also financially accessible compared to regional standards.
| Floor plans | Concord House | Cabarrus County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,900 | $3,167 | $3,584 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,500 | $4,357 | $4,055 |
The account presents a stark, multifaceted view of a site tied to charitable activity that has, in the telling, swung from controversy to care. On one hand, it opens with a vehement condemnation of events surrounding a donation drive from 2017 and the ensuing repercussions. The language is blunt and unmistakable: the facility in question is described as disgusting, and the implication is that its operations were fatally mishandled. The narrative then states that the site was shut down by the state and that, in the reviewer's view, it should never be allowed to reopen. The tone makes clear that what followed was a period of alarming deterioration, painting a picture of a place that failed those it was meant to serve and failed public trust as well.
According to this account, the conditions inside were appalling. The reviewer characterizes the location as dirty, plagued by bugs and rodents, a combination that conjures images of neglect and unsafe living conditions. The sense of relief comes later in the text, with the assurance that no one remained on the premises and that every resident had been relocated to safety. The claim that the property stood empty by October 2018 reinforces a narrative of abandonment and consequence - an eventuality the reviewer links directly to a state intervention and a determination that the site should not be reactivated. The emphasis throughout is on the severity of the perceived failure and the protective outcome for the residents.
Interwoven with this harsh depiction is a different, more hopeful description of the same site at a different point in time. The text shifts to present a contrasting scenario - "this place is currently (as of 1562017) a residence group home for folks of limited ability." Here the focus moves from condemnation to care, from neglect to a configured form of support. The phrase "folks of limited ability" signals a community-centered approach to housing and assistance, acknowledging people who may require a little more time, patience, or tailored support to navigate daily life. The tone becomes more compassionate, even if the language reflects the era in which the description was recorded.
Support within this latter framing comes from local networks, including area churches and volunteers who help out with the residents. It isn't just a matter of occupancy; there is an explicit note that designated appropriations are allocated to meet the residents' basic needs. The emphasis on church groups and volunteers underscores a communal fabric designed to sustain a residence for people who need extra assistance. In this telling, the site functions not as a neglected or abandoned facility but as a place where community members mobilize resources to ensure daily necessities - food, shelter, care - are provided. It suggests a living arrangement rooted in generosity and steady, organized support.
The juxtaposition of these two snapshots - the earlier, scathing critique of disorder and danger, and the later, caretaker-focused description - produces an overall impression of change over time, even if the dates don't align perfectly. The first passage frames a failure: a Christmas donation site that spiraled into a state-ordered shutdown, with warnings that reopening should be avoided. The second passage offers a counterpoint: a functioning group home that relies on volunteer networks and specific funding streams to address core needs. Taken together, they tell a story of resolution and transition, albeit one shaded by tension between the fear of past missteps and the hope offered by community-supported care.
One key element that emerges across the two perspectives is a focus on safety and welfare. In the first, safety is framed as a reason for relocation and dissolution: residents have been moved to secure placements, and the site is condemned as unsafe enough to warrant state intervention. In the second, safety and welfare are cast as ongoing responsibilities met through communal effort - churches, volunteers, and allocated funds are described as the means by which basic needs are sustained. The language shifts from a critique of conditions to an affirmation of support structures, signaling a transition from a troubled history to a present-day system designed to safeguard vulnerable individuals.
Ultimately, the narrative leaves readers with a sense of unresolved tension about the site's fate and its role in the community. The closing imagery in the first portion - the property being empty and up for sale - suggests that the physical space, at least, is in a period of transition or potential discontinuity. The later depiction of a resident-supported home hints at continued human connection and care, yet the exact status remains unclear due to the dated references and the mismatch between timelines. What persists across the two accounts is a shared concern for the people involved: the safety of residents, the accountability of those responsible for the site, and the possibility that a community can, through churches, volunteers, and targeted funding, sustain care even as a building's fortunes rise and fall.
In summary, the tale presented is one of dramatic contrasts wrapped around a single property. It begins with a forceful indictment of mess, neglect, and danger, moving toward a narrative of relocation and closure under state authority. It then shifts to a portrayal of a more hopeful, community-based operation - a group home supported by volunteers and church groups, with resources directed toward meeting basic needs. The piece leaves as much about the changing face of the site as about what happened within its walls: a reminder that places tied to charity can evolve from contested, troubled spaces into communities where care and assistance are actively sustained, even if the physical future of the building itself remains uncertain.
Concord House is an assisted living community located in Concord, NC. Our community offers a range of amenities and care services to meet the needs of our residents.
For those seeking spiritual support, we provide devotional services off-site as well as devotional activities offsite to promote a sense of community and connection. Our indoor common areas provide comfortable spaces for residents to socialize, relax, and engage in various activities.
In terms of care services, we specialize in providing diabetic care for individuals who require assistance managing their diabetes. Our trained staff is knowledgeable about diabetes management and will ensure that residents receive the appropriate support and attention they need.
Concord House is conveniently located near several amenities and services. We have 1 park nearby for residents to enjoy outdoor activities and nature walks. There is also 1 pharmacy nearby, making it easy for residents to access their medications and other healthcare supplies. In addition, we have 1 physician located close by for any medical needs that may arise. Transportation options are available to our residents as well, ensuring they can easily reach appointments or go on outings.
At Concord House, we strive to create a warm, caring environment where our residents feel safe, comfortable, and supported. We believe in promoting independence while providing necessary assistance with daily activities when needed.
This part of Concord, North Carolina offers a variety of convenient amenities for senior living. With several pharmacies, physicians' offices, and a hospital within close proximity, residents can easily access healthcare services. The area also features multiple parks for leisurely walks or outdoor activities. For entertainment, there are two theaters nearby as well as a selection of restaurants and cafes for dining out or socializing with friends. Places of worship provide spiritual support, while public transportation options make it easy to get around the area. Overall, this part of Concord combines essential services with recreational opportunities, making it a comfortable and convenient choice for seniors looking to settle down in the area.
At Concord House, residents can expect to find competitive monthly costs for both semi-private and one-bedroom accommodations. Specifically, the cost for a semi-private room is $1,900, significantly lower than the average rates in Cabarrus County at $3,167 and North Carolina state average of $3,584. For those interested in a one-bedroom option, Concord House charges $2,500 per month, also presenting a more budget-friendly alternative compared to Cabarrus County's average of $4,357 and North Carolina's statewide average of $4,055. This pricing structure reflects Concord House's commitment to providing quality living arrangements that are not only comfortable but also financially accessible compared to regional standards.
Concord House is located at 2339 Odell School Rd, Concord, NC 28027 in Cabarrus County, North Carolina
The Landings of Cabarrus
Kannapolis, NC
Relaxed atmosphere with walking spaces, all-inclusive pricing, and attentive staff.
The Landings of Cabarrus costs
The Landings of Cabarrus reviews
The Laurels And The Haven In Highland Creek
Charlotte, NC
Attentive staff who know residents by name and engaging activities
The Laurels And The Haven In Highland Creek reviews
The Laurels And The Haven In Highland Creek images
The Haven in Highland Creek
Charlotte, NC
Beautiful, well-maintained grounds with a neighborhood layout and dedicated dining/activities areas.
The Haven in Highland Creek costs
The Haven in Highland Creek reviews
The Haven in Highland Creek images
Sage Highland Creek
Charlotte, NC
Modern, clean, and spacious facilities with friendly staff and an active social scene.
Sage Highland Creek costs
Sage Highland Creek reviews
Sage Highland Creek images
Best of Care Assisted Living
Kannapolis, NC
Clean, home-like setting with friendly, attentive staff and homemade meals.
Best of Care Assisted Living costs
Best of Care Assisted Living reviews
Best of Care Assisted Living images
Big Elm Retirement And Nursing Centers
Kannapolis, NC
Caring, attentive staff with recently renovated rooms.
Big Elm Retirement And Nursing Centers reviews
Big Elm Retirement And Nursing Centers images
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Assisted living for adults with disabilities has transformed to provide personalized care and support services aimed at improving residents' quality of life while balancing independence and assistance. However, low-income individuals often face challenges in affording these services, requiring navigation of various financial resources and advocacy for better policies and solutions.
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted living facilities provide support for older adults needing help with daily activities without extensive medical care, but their costs can be high and vary by location and services offered. Families often seek various funding options and financial strategies to manage these expenses effectively while considering future needs and potential price increases.
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
The article discusses assisted living expenses, the importance of long-term care insurance in covering these costs, and various financing options, highlighting the need for careful policy review and early planning to address potential needs. It also clarifies common misconceptions about Medicare and private health insurance limitations regarding long-term care coverage.