67 Mountain Brook Road, Asheville, NC 28805
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Chunn's Cove Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Chunn's Cove Assisted Living offers competitive pricing for its residents, especially when compared to broader regional costs. For a semi-private room, the monthly rate is $1,825, which significantly undercuts the average rates in Buncombe County ($3,859) and throughout North Carolina ($3,584). Similarly, their studio accommodations are priced at $2,500, again offering a more affordable option than the county's average of $4,734 and the state's average of $4,020. This makes Chunn's Cove not only an appealing choice for those seeking assisted living but also a financially savvy one in comparison to surrounding alternatives.
| Floor plans | Chunn's Cove Assisted Living | Buncombe County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,825 | $3,859 | $3,584 |
| Studio | $2,500 | $4,734 | $4,020 |
Overall Review of Chunn's Cove Assisted Living
Pros
Management, staff, and residents are great.- The administrator really cares about the level of care the residents receive.
- The administrator puts in 200 percent of herself into maintaining and improving not just for the residents but also their families as well as her staff.
- God bless you Becky!
Cons
The facility mistreated residents from day one and confiscated their wallets for personal use.- Bed bugs, mold, and doors left open at all times were reported.
- Family members were refused access and threatened with police.
- A resident allegedly lay in bed for two days before passing away without anyone checking on him.
- There are accusations of abuse and unauthorized financial transactions to bank accounts when Medicaid should have paid for their stay.
- The food is consistently cold, toilets are dirty, showers are cold, meals are not served on time, and residents feel caged.
- The staff are described as unqualified, with allegations of improper medication administration and pocketing narcotics.
- Medications were habitually late or not given on time, and pay/hours for staff were routinely mishandled.
- The facility is urged to be shut down, described as unsafe, unprofessional, and dirty.
Review
Chunn’s Cove Assisted Living in Asheville is best suited for families that are extraordinarily budget-conscious and prepared to take an active, ongoing role in oversight. This community is not a good fit for residents who require dependable, professionally consistent care, nor for families who expect transparent operations, stable staffing, and reliable safety. The strongest signal from the feedback is a pattern of severe care gaps, with a clear message: risk tolerance must be high and advocacy must be constant. For those who cannot commit to daily monitoring, alternative options with steadier staffing, better training, and firmer safeguards are highly advisable.
Clearly, some families will want to consider alternatives if the goal is predictable quality and safety. Facilities with established licensing and regular state inspections, stronger medication management, and consistently clean environments are worth pursuing. In Asheville, the track record here raises red flags that are hard to overlook for seniors with mobility issues, cognitive impairments, or complex medical needs. Any decision-maker should prioritize a setting where staff are sufficiently trained, perform adequate rounds, and maintain reliable hygiene and maintenance standards, criteria that appear unevenly met at this community.
The few positives that emerge from the narratives revolve around dedicated individuals who still strive to deliver care. The administrator who “really cares about the level of care” and the notion that some staff, residents, and families experience workable relationships indicate that genuine compassion exists within the walls. When present, these elements can make a meaningful difference in daily life and provide a lifeline for families who can intervene constructively. However, such bright spots are sporadic and cannot counterbalance the breadth and severity of documented shortcomings.
The dominant concerns, by contrast, paint a distressing picture of daily life for residents. Reports describe mistreatment, alleged financial misconduct, and unauthorized access to resident funds. Clinical lapses are repeatedly cited: late or missed medications, unlicensed staff administering drugs, and questionable nursing oversight. Hygiene and cleanliness appear to be recurring issues, with complaints about bedsores, dirty facilities, and equipment in disrepair. Medication timing problems, a lack of formal training, and staff being overextended due to understaffing translate into tangible risks to safety and well-being. The environment is described as unwelcoming and, in some cases, unsafe, with stubborn maintenance and governance problems that undermine trust.
Whether the occasional positive interactions offset the significant drawbacks is a question of risk calculus. In practice, the pros, compassionate, engaged individuals when they show up, and a few staff who are clearly trying, do not neutralize persistent failures in core caregiving functions. The most consequential elements, medication integrity, sanitary conditions, emotional and physical safety, and transparent, constructive communication with families, are where the cons overwhelmingly dominate. For families with even modest medical or behavioral needs, the cost of choosing this community is measured in frequent alarms and the fear of inadequate oversight rather than in any nets of dependable protection.
The bottom line is directional: this community should be approached with extreme caution and only after exhaustive due diligence and protective arrangements. Prospective residents and families should demand comprehensive, verifiable assurances on licensing status, staffing ratios, and ongoing training; demand evidence of adherence to medication protocols and incident reporting; and insist on detailed plans for infection control, housekeeping schedules, and maintenance responsiveness. On-site visits should be extended, with conversations held with current residents and families about day-to-day routines, safety practices, and how emergencies are managed. If these guardrails cannot be met, the sensible conclusion is to look elsewhere in Asheville for a setting that delivers consistent care, safety, and dignity without the constant undercurrent of risk. For most families, that means prioritizing facilities with demonstrable stability, transparent operations, and a track record of reliable, professional caregiving.
67 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Respite Care
Activities on-site
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Asheville Regional (12 miles away)
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs