3501 Dakota Ave, South Sioux City, NE 68776
To contact a resident: (402) 494-4273
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Regency Square Costs & Pricing
Regency Square offers competitive pricing for its living accommodations, with both studio and one-bedroom apartments priced at $3,090 and $3,660 per month, respectively. Notably, these rates align perfectly with the average costs in Dakota County, providing residents with a consistent value within their local market. However, compared to Nebraska's averages, Regency Square presents a more cost-effective option for prospective tenants; while studio apartments in Nebraska can reach up to $3,728, Regency Square maintains a lower price point. Similarly, the one-bedroom units in Nebraska are priced significantly lower at $3,167. Overall, Regency Square stands out as an attractive choice for those seeking quality housing without the premium prices often found in surrounding areas.
| Floor plans | Regency Square | Dakota County | Nebraska |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,090 | $3,090 | $3,728 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,660 | $3,660 | $3,167 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Regency Square
Pros
The facility is a great place for seniors and their families.
The staff are kind, attentive, and happy to engage with residents.
The environment feels pleasant and home-like, with a nice dining area and no nursing-home smell.
The staff go the extra mile to ensure residents are comfortable and well cared for, and they keep families informed.
The facility is clean, well maintained, and responsive to maintenance requests.
Meals are good with plenty of variety, and there are many enjoyable activities, including music events.
Cons
The staff were ignorant and racist.
A nurse dismissed the resident’s name and showed ignorance toward their ethnicity.
The administrator’s treatment of employees was disgusting.
Management deletes negative reviews instead of acknowledging their wrongs.
Review
Regency Square in South Sioux City, NE is best suited for families seeking a warm, homelike assisted living environment where care feels personal and residents are integrated into a lively daily rhythm. This community tends to reward those who value a staff presence that feels more like an extended family, with a calendar rich in activities, regular music events, church services, and opportunities for social engagement. It works well for residents who want ongoing companionship, affordable, approachable dining, and a sense that living here is more about daily life and relationships than a strictly clinical setting.
The strongest positives center on continuity, character, and day-to-day responsiveness. Families repeatedly describe care that feels heartfelt and personalized, with staff often going “the extra mile” to keep a loved one comfortable and informed. Longtime residence stories, some spanning several years, paint Regency Square as a place where apartments become home, housekeeping and maintenance are promptly addressed, and meals offer variety in a pleasant dining environment. The facility presents as clean, with an atmosphere that does not resemble a sterile nursing home and that supports an active, engaging lifestyle through a range of activities, exercise options, and social/faith-based programming. In short, for parents who want a familiar, relational care experience and a bustling, resident-centered culture, Regency Square delivers a compelling case.
Yet the reviews also highlight significant concerns that cannot be brushed aside. A subset of commenters alleges problematic attitudes among some staff, including racist remarks and a sense that a portion of the nursing team may not fully reflect the community’s values. Equally troubling to some families is criticism of leadership and its handling of internal dynamics, claims that management can be dismissive and that negative feedback is not always acknowledged or appropriately addressed. These cautions are serious because they touch on the core expectations of dignity, respect, and accountability that families rely on in long-term care. The presence of strong praise from some residents and families coexists with these pointed critiques, signaling a facility with meaningful strengths but uneven experiences tied to staffing and culture.
The key pros partially offset the main cons when weighed by what families prioritize. For those who value continuity of care and a sense of belonging, the long-tenured staff and “family” atmosphere can mitigate concerns about occasional miscommunication or mood in a given shift. The ability to observe a robust activities calendar, steady family communication, and maintenance responsiveness provides tangible reassurance that daily life runs smoothly for many residents. However, for families whose nonnegotiables include a consistently inclusive, discrimination-free environment and transparent, responsive leadership, the risk signals require careful verification. In practical terms, Regency Square can be an excellent fit if the priority is a heartfelt caregiving culture and an active, social lifestyle; it becomes less attractive if governance issues or reported staff attitudes are nonnegotiable deal-breakers.
Prospective residents and families should approach a tour with a concrete checklist. Ask to meet a variety of caregivers, review recent activity calendars, and observe meal service during different days and times. Inquire specifically about staff turnover, how concerns are triaged, and what anti-discrimination training looks like in practice. Request candid conversations with current residents about day-to-day interactions with staff, and probe how the administration addresses conflicts or issues when they arise. Finally, verify the quality of routine communications with families, how updates are delivered, what information is shared, and how quickly concerns receive a response.
In the final assessment, Regency Square is a practical fit for families who prize a home-like, relational care model, where residents feel valued, connected, and engaged, and where staff dedication shines in everyday moments. It is less suited for those who insist on a uniformly flawless administrative culture, zero tolerance for any discriminatory behavior, and an environment where leadership consistently models transparent, issue-driven accountability. For families weighing options, those seeking a deeply personal, community-centered experience may choose Regency Square, while others with tighter expectations around governance, cultural sensitivity, and staff consistency may prefer alternatives that emphasize a stricter, more standardized ethos.

















An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit
Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living




