Cambridge Court - Great Falls
Save
1109 6th Ave N, Great Falls, MT 59401
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Cambridge Court in Great Falls offers competitive pricing for assisted living accommodations when compared to the broader metrics of Cascade County and the state of Montana. For a semi-private room, residents can expect a monthly cost of $600, which is significantly lower than the county average of $2,033 and the statewide average of $3,874. Studio apartments at Cambridge Court are priced at $1,745, still well below both the county ($3,660) and state averages ($3,729). Furthermore, the one-bedroom options are available at $2,775, which is more economical compared to the county's average of $3,303 and Montana's average of $3,468. This favorable pricing structure positions Cambridge Court as a financially viable choice for individuals seeking quality senior living without sacrificing comfort or care.
| Floor plans | Cambridge Court - Great Falls | Cascade County | Montana |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $600 | $2,033 | $3,874 |
| Studio | $1,745 | $3,660 | $3,729 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,775 | $3,303 | $3,468 |
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
The collection of critiques paints a troubling portrait of a facility whose promise of care and comfort seems to unravel under the weight of neglect, mismanagement, and inconsistent quality. The commenters express a shared sense of relief that the place has been shut down, but they pair that relief with a hard-edged accusation: those who ran it allowed conditions to deteriorate to the point where residents and visitors deserved better. One reviewer even goes so far as to suggest that the head of the operation should be held accountable, framing the situation as not merely disappointing but dangerous for vulnerable residents.
Cleanliness and upkeep emerge as the most immediate and recurring sources of dissatisfaction. Halls are described as not being vacuumed, carpets not shampooed, and tables routinely dirty. The physical environment feels, to several reviewers, neglected rather than maintained. Subtle comforts are missing, and even essential conveniences seem mishandled. For example, smoking is noted as being allowed, a detail that may reflect broader policy gaps or lax enforcement. A critical detail that compounds the frustration is the first-floor bathroom being out of order, forcing at least one person to search for an alternative facility across the street. These operational gaps - combined with inconsistent staffing presence, such as no one being available in the evenings - contribute to a sense that residents' daily routines were not reliably supported in a safe or dignified way.
There is a strong thread of concern about who actually runs the place. Several lines tie the facility's leadership to someone named Dena from the Rainbow Assisted Living, with the implication that the same leadership oversees multiple properties. The tone suggests that the management quality is not isolated to a single venue but is part of a broader pattern that critics believe is seriously detrimental. The admonition is blunt: readers should avoid not only this facility but, in the reviewers' view, the Rainbow cluster as well. The implication is that residents and their families should be wary of who is making decisions behind the scenes, because those choices appear to directly affect residents' safety, comfort, and dignity.
Beyond the administrative portrayal, the reviews offer a more nuanced view of care staff. One consistent point is that the CNA staff are seen as helpful, indicating that there are individuals on the ground who are dedicated and capable in their roles. This suggests that the quality of direct care could vary depending on the day or the person assigned, rather than reflecting a purely systemic failure of caregiving. Yet when the focus shifts to management, the sentiment shifts sharply toward distrust and frustration. The Administrator and the Wellness Director are described in strongly negative terms - as a "nightmare to deal with" and "completely disingenuous." Such characterizations underscore a belief that even when front-line workers perform well, the overarching administration undermines the resident and family experience through poor communication, opacity, or a lack of genuine accountability. The emotional weight of these statements is intensified by the observation that the impact of management problems is felt most acutely by residents who rely on family and friends for support and visitation.
Echoes of these concerns appear more than once, reinforcing the impression of a deeply flawed organizational culture. The repetition of similar criticisms by different reviewers adds a sense of consistency to the pattern: management issues are not isolated incidents but a systemic problem, at least in the eyes of those who experienced the facility firsthand. The reviews argue that this kind of leadership undermines resident welfare and visitor confidence alike, turning what should be a reassuring option for care into something families actively seek to avoid.
Amid the strong negative voices, there is a brief, counterbalancing note of potential appeal found in the same reviews. Some reviewers acknowledge that they had previously considered the place and still found elements they liked - the openness of the space and, on one occasion, the quality of the food. These snippets hint at a facility that - despite its serious shortcomings - contains features that could be attractive under different management or with more consistent maintenance. The juxtaposition of these positive observations with the broader criticisms suggests that the core infrastructure and leadership dynamics, rather than the concept of the place itself, drove the dissatisfaction.
Taken together, the reviews present a complex and troubling picture. They speak of neglect in daily operations - from cleanliness to functioning bathrooms and available attendants - paired with a management culture that many find opaque, disingenuous, or simply unresponsive to residents' needs. The CNA staff's helpfulness offers a counterpoint, indicating that compassionate, capable caregiving can exist within the same organization, but it fails to offset the overarching concerns about leadership and policy enforcement. For families and prospective residents, the takeaway is a cautionary one: ensure you understand who is making decisions, how care is coordinated and overseen, and what steps are in place to address maintenance and daily living needs before engaging with a facility that, in several reviewers' eyes, did not live up to its promised standard of care.
Cambridge Court - Great Falls is an assisted living community located in the picturesque city of Great Falls, MT. Our community specializes in memory care, providing a safe and supportive environment for individuals dealing with memory loss conditions.
At Cambridge Court - Great Falls, we understand the importance of catering to each individual's unique needs. Our well-trained staff offers personalized care and assistance, especially for those with diabetic needs. We are committed to ensuring the health and well-being of our residents through specialized care plans.
Our community provides a warm and inviting atmosphere with indoor common areas where residents can socialize, relax, and engage in various activities. We also offer devotional services off-site to accommodate spiritual needs.
Convenience is at your doorstep at Cambridge Court - Great Falls, as we are surrounded by various amenities nearby. With 10 cafes, residents can enjoy a variety of dining options when they want to explore beyond our community's delicious meals. For outdoor enthusiasts, there are 10 parks close by where residents can take leisurely strolls or enjoy nature's beauty.
We prioritize easy access to medical services by having 9 pharmacies and 20 physicians nearby. In case of emergencies or specialized medical needs, our community is within close proximity to 2 hospitals.
Transportation is made hassle-free with two transportation options available nearby for outings or medical appointments. Additionally, we understand the importance of spirituality in one's life; hence there are 11 places of worship nearby for residents who wish to attend religious services.
Overall, Cambridge Court - Great Falls offers a caring and supportive environment for individuals requiring memory care services in Great Falls, MT. With convenient amenities and specialized care plans, our residents can thrive while receiving compassionate assistance tailored to their specific needs.
This part of Great Falls, Montana offers a wide range of amenities and services that cater to senior living needs. With several places of worship nearby, seniors can easily access spiritual support and community engagement. The abundance of parks provides opportunities for leisurely walks and outdoor activities, promoting an active lifestyle. Additionally, the diverse selection of cafes and restaurants offer convenient dining options for socializing and enjoying meals with friends or family. Access to physicians, pharmacies, and hospitals ensures that medical care is readily available in case of any health concerns. Overall, this neighborhood provides a comfortable and convenient environment for seniors looking to settle down in Great Falls.
Cambridge Court in Great Falls offers competitive pricing for assisted living accommodations when compared to the broader metrics of Cascade County and the state of Montana. For a semi-private room, residents can expect a monthly cost of $600, which is significantly lower than the county average of $2,033 and the statewide average of $3,874. Studio apartments at Cambridge Court are priced at $1,745, still well below both the county ($3,660) and state averages ($3,729). Furthermore, the one-bedroom options are available at $2,775, which is more economical compared to the county's average of $3,303 and Montana's average of $3,468. This favorable pricing structure positions Cambridge Court as a financially viable choice for individuals seeking quality senior living without sacrificing comfort or care.
Cambridge Court - Great Falls is located at 1109 6th Ave N, Great Falls, MT 59401 in Cascade County, Montana
Yes, Cambridge Court - Great Falls provides memory care services for residents with mild or advanced stages of dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
Yes, Cambridge Court - Great Falls allows both dogs and cats.
Meadowlark Assisted Living Facility
Great Falls, MT
Caring owner and compassionate staff foster a warm, home-like environment.
Meadowlark Assisted Living Facility reviews
Meadowlark Assisted Living Facility images
MT Gems Inc-Sapphire House
Great Falls, MT
Comprehensive care options (assisted living, memory care) with 24-hour supervision and restaurant-style dining plus on-site amenities.
MT Gems Inc-Sapphire House costs
MT Gems Inc-Sapphire House reviews
MT Gems Inc-Sapphire House images
MT Gems Inc-Ruby House
Great Falls, MT
Secure environment with compassionate, home-like care and engaging activities.
MT Gems Inc-Ruby House costs
MT Gems Inc-Ruby House reviews
MT Gems Inc-Ruby House images
Rainbow Retirement and Assisted Living
Great Falls, MT
Friendly staff and supportive admissions process.
Rainbow Retirement and Assisted Living costs
Rainbow Retirement and Assisted Living reviews
Rainbow Retirement and Assisted Living images
Park Manor Retirement Apartments
Great Falls, MT
Excellent access to nearby amenities and healthcare.
Park Manor Retirement Apartments reviews
Park Manor Retirement Apartments images
Golden Eagle Plaza
Great Falls, MT
Caring staff, delicious meals, clean and spacious apartments, with engaging activities and transportation services.
Golden Eagle Plaza costs
Golden Eagle Plaza reviews
Golden Eagle Plaza images
Highgate at Great Falls
Great Falls, MT
Caring, competent staff; clean, well-maintained facility; strong memory-care support and COVID-19 safety.
Highgate at Great Falls reviews
Highgate at Great Falls images
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Assisted living provides moderate support for seniors seeking independence, while memory care offers specialized support for individuals with dementia or cognitive impairments through structured routines and trained staff. Key differences include care approaches, environment security measures, staff training levels, activity types, and cost considerations.
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.
Safeguarding Your Memory Through the Golden Years: Eight Ways to Preserve Cognitive Health
The article presents eight strategies for preserving cognitive health and memory in older adults, emphasizing a nutrient-rich diet, regular exercise, intellectually stimulating activities, adequate sleep, social connections, stress management techniques, limiting harmful substances, and regular medical checkups to mitigate age-related memory decline.