Hazel Senior Living in St. Paul, MN

Memory care communities with a similar price nearby

• from +$300 / mo

  Our House Senior Living - New Richmond Memory Care

  4.9 from 41 reviews

  $3,800 / month

  25.0 miles away
• from -$500 / mo

  Highland on Graham

  4.9 from 29 reviews

  $3,000 to $4,000 / month

  9.5 miles away
• from -$673 / mo

  New Perspective Mahtomedi

  4.8 from 19 reviews

  $2,827 to $4,076 / month

  6.7 miles away
• from -$160 / mo

  The Fountains at Hosanna

  4.7 from 113 reviews

  $3,340 to $4,440 / month

  21.7 miles away
• from +$280 / mo

  Lilydale Senior Living

  4.8 from 17 reviews

  $3,780 / month

  7.5 miles away

Pros

• Empower Center Care was wonderful from the start.
• The staff were welcoming, attentive, and informative.
• The staff took the time to understand families' needs.
• The staff walked families through financing options.
• The staff gave a guided tour of the facility.
• Families felt supported and heard throughout the process.
• All questions were answered with care.
• The center is highly recommended for anyone seeking care for their loved ones.
• Empower provided 24/7 support that families couldn't provide at home.
• The staff spoke Hmong and provided Hmong food.
• Pepper was included at every meal.
• The resident loved the staff.
• The family felt fortunate to have Empower.

Cons

• One reviewer alleged that the care is inadequate, with residents often neglected and not allowed to eat unless explicitly permitted by the owners.
• The reviewer alleged that the staff appears poorly trained, putting patients at significant risk.
• The reviewer accused the owners of exploiting residents financially by taking their monthly checks and failing to allocate funds appropriately.
• The reviewer described falsified documents, reports, and charges for services that were never provided.
• The reviewer stated that the facility’s license was revoked due to a preventable death and maltreatment of a patient.
• The reviewer claimed the facility changed its name to hide its identity during legal troubles and state investigations.

Review

Hazel Senior Living in St. Paul is best suited for families seeking a warm, person-centered environment where staff attention is hands-on, financing questions are addressed plainly, and daily life feels culturally attuned. The strongest case rests on immediate, tangible support: welcoming, attentive staff who take time to understand family needs, walk through payment options, and provide a guided tour that helps families picture the stay. For communities with a preference for multilingual communication and culturally familiar meals, Hazel stands out because caregivers have spoken languages other than English and have accommodated familiar dining rhythms. This combination creates a practical, reassuring foundation for residents transitioning from home care to a supervised setting.

Those considering alternatives should note a few red flags that would tilt the decision away from Hazel. Families with low tolerance for governance questions, transparency gaps, or past allegations of licensing trouble should shortlist other options with a longer, cleaner regulatory history. Memory care or higher-acuity medical needs may also push families to compare facilities known for specialized clinical staffing and consistently reported quality metrics. In short, Hazel’s strengths will attract families prioritizing warmth and transition support, but risk-sensitive buyers will want to explore options with more visible track records of governance and ongoing compliance.

The core pros, responsive staff, clear financing guidance, and a straightforward intake experience, do meaningful work in offsetting some of the inherent uncertainties in selecting a living arrangement. A grandmother’s long stay underscores the potential for stable, ongoing care when relationships with caregivers are established and routines become familiar. The ability to tailor meals and language options at intake reduces friction and stress for family members and residents alike, translating into daily life that feels manageable rather than alien. In practice, these advantages can help families move beyond hesitation, secure a sense of daily quality, and maintain continuity in care decisions as needs evolve.

However, the most serious concern raised by a single, strongly negative review cannot be dismissed lightly. Accusations of name changes, licensing trouble, alleged neglect, and financial exploitation strike at the core of trust and risk management. If true, those issues suggest a pattern that could undermine safety, accountability, and resident welfare, regardless of otherwise positive day-to-day interactions. Until independent verification is obtained, through state inspections, current licensing status, and verifiable resident or family references, these claims demand vigilant verification. They also justify a heightened emphasis on governance clarity and regular, transparent reporting from leadership.

For families actively evaluating Hazel, a disciplined due-diligence plan is essential. Schedule candid conversations with the administrator about current ownership, licensing status, and any corrective actions from recent surveys. Request the latest state inspection reports, call a few current families or residents for unfiltered feedback, and tour care areas during different shifts to observe staffing levels and response times. Bring questions about payment flows, payroll transparency, and the handling of resident funds, and insist on written policies that address conflict-of-interest safeguards. Compare Hazel’s answers to a shortlist of peers with stable governance records and clearly documented care outcomes to ensure the chosen path aligns with tolerance for risk and the desire for dependable oversight.

In the final assessment, Hazel Senior Living can be a strong fit for families who prize personnel warmth, cultural sensitivity, and clear upfront guidance on financing, provided that governance and safety concerns are thoroughly vetted and current. The positive day-to-day experiences captured in multiple reviews, strong staff engagement, cultural accommodations, and transparent intake conversations, signal real value when trust in leadership is sound. For families where regulatory history, consistent ownership, and uncompromised resident protection are non-negotiable, it is prudent to widen the field and prioritize facilities with documented, ongoing compliance and fewer unresolved red flags. The recommended path is guided due diligence: verify, compare, and then decide with confidence based on a complete, verified picture.