1105 Hazel Street N, St Paul, MN 55119
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Sunlight Services - Hazel Seni
Pros
The facility is nice.- Grandmothers living there are well taken care of.
- Staffing is absolutely amazing, and residents have had no problems since the new director, Alvin, arrived.
- Alvin has brought in nice, caring people to take care of residents.
- Things have improved substantially since moving in.
- The facility has fantastic teamwork and creates a phenomenal atmosphere for residents, families, and staff.
Cons
The reviewer notes chronic poor staffing and no dietitian, resulting in meals that don’t meet residents’ health needs.- Residents report theft among peers, with items stolen from apartments and unfixed door hinges left for months.
- A sister’s room was described as filthy, with stinky conditions, yellow sheets, feces behind the toilet, and two weeks without hot water.
- The reviewer says the facility is horrendous, with multiple instances of no staff present and residents having to let people in.
- Online posts raised concerns about cleanliness, suggesting unannounced visits before choosing the facility.
- The facility is described as disgusting and in need of investigation.
- Phone service rarely works, staff are rude, and records requests are often refused due to understaffing.
- The facility has ongoing understaffing and questionable care quality; a resident was removed after only a month under horrendous circumstances.
- There is a cockroach and mice infestation, a rancid smell of urine and feces, stained carpets, and meals that are cold.
- New ownership is said to care only about money and to treat residents poorly.
- Translators are unavailable for non-English speakers, supplies are limited, and there is no COVID screening for visitors, compromising safety.
Review
Sunlight Services - Hazel Seni in St. Paul is best suited for families that prioritize hands-on oversight and leadership-driven improvement, and are prepared to evaluate care quality on an ongoing basis. When the staffing is functioning, residents experience attentive caregivers and a director who has demonstrated a willingness to adjust team dynamics. This setting can work for seniors who don’t demand flawless day-to-day perfection but do require responsive staff and a visible commitment from leadership. The caveat is clear: consistency varies, and a steady, high-quality experience is not guaranteed based on current broader feedback.
Alternatives should be considered for families whose non-negotiables include pristine cleanliness, unwavering safety, transparent administration, and reliable, error-free operations. The strongest red flags in the reviews center on infestations, maintenance delays, broken doors, and frequent staffing turnover, all of which undermine basic safety and comfort. For non-English speakers, the lack of translation support is another practical barrier. If a resident requires a dedicated dietitian and personalized meal planning to accommodate health concerns, note that the facility itself has highlighted the absence of such specialty dietary oversight, suggesting a significant gap for residents with complex nutritional needs.
On the upside, several residents report meaningful improvements when a new director is present and staffing stabilizes. Positive observations about teamwork and care quality indicate real potential when leadership actively manages turnover and rebuilds front-line relationships. These favorable accounts show that the facility can deliver dependable caregiving and a cooperative atmosphere, provided that staffing remains stable and genuinely resident-centered. Yet these benefits are episodic rather than universal, and they do not automatically cancel out the array of systemic concerns that continue to surface across multiple reviews.
The more troubling threads run through maintenance, cleanliness, safety, and administrative responsiveness. Repeated mentions of under-staffing, months-long repair delays, and cleanliness lapses, odor, stained linens, and inconsistent bathing, create a baseline of risk that cannot be ignored. Allegations of pest issues, limited supplies, and inconsistent access to records or records handling further erode trust. Ownership and financial-driven management concerns compound these issues, suggesting that improvements may hinge on ongoing scrutiny and external oversight rather than internal stability alone. In short, conditions appear to swing with leadership presence and staffing rosters, making predictability elusive.
For families actively evaluating care, a disciplined site visit is essential and should be conducted unannounced when possible. Observers should assess how quickly staff respond, inspect living spaces for cleanliness and safety, and review meal quality and the ability to accommodate dietary restrictions. Request access to menus and care plans, confirm medication handling and refrigeration where required, and probe pest control and housekeeping frequencies. Interview multiple staff members and residents about incident reporting, transparency, and the ease of obtaining records. If a current state or ombudsman summary exists, it should inform the decision alongside firsthand on-site impressions rather than relying on reputation or isolated stories.
Bottom line: Sunlight Hazel Seni offers pockets of solid care under proactive leadership, but the breadth of documented concerns makes it a conditional choice. For families able to commit to rigorous supervision, frequent visits, and active negotiation around diet, housekeeping, and safety, it can be workable. For those needing consistent cleanliness, watertight safety, transparent processes, and predictable staffing, alternatives are advisable. The decision hinges on tolerance for variability and the capacity to implement ongoing oversight to ensure that the strongest positives prevail over the persistent negatives.
28 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (12 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide