2740 Minnehaha Avenue South #37, Minneapolis, MN 55406
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Twin Cities Group Homes
Pros
The place is great.- The complex is a wonderful place with good access to the bus and light rail.
- Cub, Target, and Dollar Tree are all within walking distance, along with many local coffee shops and food establishments.
- It is a great place to live, close to stores, the light rail, and bars in a safe area.
- Bite Squad delivers to this location.
Cons
The management are the worst in this place and will drive residents out.- Maintenance takes forever to fix anything.
- Management constantly harasses residents, watching every move they make.
- Every four months new management comes up with new rules to drive residents nuts and give them anxiety.
- The building is not well kept.
- Work orders take forever to fix things.
- They are letting all sorts of losers rent there, making it more susceptible to crime.
- There are always junkies milling about and getting easy access into the building.
- There is no security and getting the cops to show up is difficult.
- The buildings are boarded up and familiar businesses closed.
Review
This community is best suited for residents who prize location and affordability over pristine upkeep or seamless on-site management. For those who want quick access to transit (light rail, bus lines) and nearby shopping and services (Cub, Target, Dollar Tree, coffee shops), Twin Cities Group Homes offers a practical base in Minneapolis. It appeals to self-sufficient individuals who can tolerate a volatile management climate and inconsistent maintenance rhythm in exchange for a budget-friendly option that keeps them close to amenities. In short, this is a workable choice for someone who values convenience and cost containment more than predictability in operations.
Those who should seriously consider alternatives are families and individuals who require steady, professional management and reliable, timely repairs. Anyone who cannot tolerate frequent rule changes, perceived harassment from on-site leadership, or a revolving door of management will likely find the environment draining. If a calm, predictable routine and a secure, well-maintained building are non-negotiables, this community is not the right fit. Prospective residents who insist on clear, stable policies and responsive staff should look at other options with longer tenures in ownership or management.
The strongest positives center on location and everyday practicality. The proximity to stores, public transit, and the surrounding urban amenities creates a compelling daily life rhythm for many residents. Several reviews point to easy access to essential services and the appeal of living in a neighborhood with transit options and local conveniences. The ability to have food delivery, evidenced by mentions of reliable delivery services, adds a functional bonus for residents who prefer convenience over stricter on-site programming. Taken together, these factors keep the place attractive for budget-conscious renters who value lifestyle flexibility.
However, the main drawbacks are substantial and frequently reinforced by lived experience. Maintenance requests are described as slow or neglected, turning routine fixes into extended frustrations. Management is repeatedly characterized as overbearing, inconsistent, and prone to implementing new rules every few months, which can create anxiety and a sense of instability for residents. The combination of harassment concerns and frequent leadership turnover erodes trust and makes day-to-day living feel precarious. When walls between residents and management fray, even otherwise workable layouts and amenities lose their appeal.
Safety and security concerns compound the downsides. Reviews reference a permissive-appearing environment where “loose” elements and crime risk feel elevated, with reports of no on-site security and uneven police response. The mood is not one of a carefully managed community but rather a space susceptible to external pressures and internal governance challenges. In a setting where you want predictable enforcement of rules and dependable maintenance, these factors can overwhelm the positives of transit access and proximity to services.
The practical decision comes into sharper focus when mapping priorities. If stability, predictable routines, and responsive maintenance are non-negotiables, steer toward a community with a steadier management team and better on-site security and upkeep. If, instead, the priority is urban living on a tighter budget, with the ability to navigate potential friction and to tolerate a changing policy landscape, Twin Cities Group Homes can work, at least as a transitional arrangement or for residents who are comfortable advocating for themselves and managing expectations. Before committing, inquire about current leadership, recent turnover, ongoing maintenance backlogs, and any recurring neighborhood safety concerns, and compare with alternatives that offer longer-tenure management and more robust resident support services.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (5 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs