4100 Minnesota Drive Unit 300, Edina, MN 55435
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Across these accounts, a common thread is dissatisfaction with how iHealth handles billing and how the organization talks to patients when money and health care intersect. Several reviewers frame their experiences as a breakdown in basic courtesy and clarity, especially when the topic is something as important as a bill or a claim. In one pointed airing, a person addresses a billing staffer by name and title and accuses the interaction of lacking any real customer service, even going so far as to say, "Ma'am, you do not provide any customer service." The sentiment isn't just about one encounter; it recurs as a pattern: short responses, hurried exits, and an impression that patient concerns are a nuisance rather than a priority. These posts collectively paint a picture of a system where the people who are supposed to help with money matters feel distant or dismissive, leaving patients frustrated and more anxious about their own health care needs.
Several reviewers focus on the denial process and how claims are handled. When a claim is denied by an insurer, one reviewer says iHealth did not take the initiative to reach out to the insurer to determine the reason for denial. After a lengthy 20-minute wait, the patient describes the staff as "annoyed" when asked to double-check the information submitted, and the review notes that patients were effectively forced to resolve the issue with the insurer themselves. The review goes further, asserting that iHealth had submitted the claim incorrectly and that the insurer would call iHealth to resolve the problem on the health plan's behalf. This cascade of missteps - mis-submitted claims, resistance to rechecking data, and a transfer of responsibility back to the patient - gives the impression that the organization struggles to own and fix its own billing errors, even as health outcomes depend on timely, accurate billings and explanations.
Amid the criticism, there are stories of standout compassion and effective care from some individuals. One reviewer contrasts the experiences in billing with the care they received from a staff member named Sue in the office. Sue is described as someone who listens, cares deeply, and "gets it DONE." This reviewer emphasizes that Sue was the one who truly helped them navigate procedures and determine how they would qualify for the care they needed. The praise for Sue highlights a bright spot in an otherwise fraught landscape: when a patient encounters a person who communicates clearly, follows through, and treats their situation with empathy, that experience becomes a counterweight to the pervasive billing complaints. It's a reminder that, even within a system facing systemic issues, individual staff members can make a meaningful difference for patients.
Not all encounters are redeemable by one individual's kindness or competence. Another reviewer singles out a staff member named Jordon (Jordan), describing her as someone who does "not do anything of worth" and labeling the experience as part of the broader pattern of poor customer service. The language here is sharp and personal, reflecting a sense that particular staff members - not just the system - are responsible for quality care. This negative observation sits alongside other anecdotes about feeling dismissed or short-changed when asking for basic help with bills or scheduling. It underscores the gravity of how front-line staff behavior can color a patient's overall impression of a clinic or billing office, reinforcing the demand for consistent training and accountability across all workers.
The Eagan location emerges as a mixed narrative in the same collection of reviews. On the one hand, reviewers describe a newly opened, large facility: a "beautiful place" near notable landmarks, with a surgery center and a CDI, and a campus-wide sense that the physical space is modern and expansive. On the other hand, patients report the typical friction points that accompany large clinics: be prepared to walk a bit, and be ready for multiple staff interactions in a single visit. One patient recounts a troubling encounter where a staff member seemed to have the wrong chart, and the patient was confronted with confusion about who should see them. In that moment, the reviewer says they were so upset that they walked out. The overall tone toward the Eagan site blends appreciation for the facility's scale and appearance with explicit concerns about accuracy, consistency, and the ability of the process to translate a patient's medical needs into coherent, correct records and appropriate care.
Therapy and treatment experiences are another dimension of these narratives, revealing inconsistency in how care is delivered. Over nearly six weeks, a patient describes seeing three different people twice a week, resulting in 17 different exercises and a patchwork of approaches: some therapists use icing, others don't; one session includes a bike, another does not; there are discrepancies about what has been previously communicated by the patient about pain or functional ability. A particularly jarring moment involves a staff member asking about pain and then referencing a chart the patient says was not accurate: the patient insists they never stated certain limitations or used a shopping cart, only to be confronted with conflicting records. A sense of fragmentation and miscommunication pervades these therapy sessions, contributing to the feeling that patients are not always treated as coherent individuals with a continuous care plan, but rather as subjects of a revolving door of staff with inconsistent information.
Throughout these accounts, the tension between the need for reliable billing, accurate documentation, and compassionate clinical care is laid bare. Some reviewers call for better systems altogether - for example, a formal customer feedback mechanism to capture patient experiences with billing and service, not merely a passive hope that someone somewhere cares. Others directly challenge the idea that a health system can deliver care while sidestepping the fundamental responsibility of delivering clear, timely bills and accurate insurer communications. A recurring theme is the demand for accountability, consistency, and better training across the board - both in the billing office and in the clinical teams - to restore trust that health care providers and their administrative partners will act with integrity and a patient-centered focus.
Taken together, these reviews present a landscape with both notable high points and significant gaps. The most compelling praise centers on individuals who demonstrate genuine care and competence - those who listen, clarify, and take concrete steps to resolve issues. Yet the bulk of the narratives centers on billing and communication problems that leave patients feeling misled, under-supported, or treated as interruptions to the business of health care rather than as people with real health needs. The critiques about staffing, processes, and misaligned information imply that improvements are possible but urgently needed: training for customer-facing staff, better workflows for claim resolution, reliable and timely bill delivery, and a consistent, patient-centered approach across all locations and roles. Until those changes happen, the experiences described in these accounts suggest that patients will continue to face a cliff between the care they receive and the administrative experience that should accompany it.
Revo Health in Edina, MN is a vibrant and welcoming assisted living community that offers a wide range of amenities and care services for its residents. The community is fully furnished and provides all the comforts of home, including a cable or satellite TV, Wi-Fi/high-speed internet, and a small library for residents to enjoy.
Meals are a delightful experience at Revo Health, with restaurant-style dining available and special dietary restrictions accommodated. The dedicated kitchenette allows residents to prepare their own meals if desired. Housekeeping services ensure that the living spaces are always clean and tidy.
The care services at Revo Health are designed to provide assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. Residents with diabetes can benefit from specialized meal plans, while medication management is provided to ensure that medications are taken correctly. A mental wellness program is also available to support the emotional well-being of residents.
Residents of Revo Health can take advantage of the beautiful outdoor space and garden for relaxation or socializing. Scheduled daily activities and resident-run activities provide ample opportunities for social engagement and stimulation.
Convenience is paramount at Revo Health, with numerous amenities nearby. There are four cafes, parks, pharmacies, restaurants, 10 physicians' offices, three hospitals within close proximity to the community. Transportation options are also available for ease of access.
At Revo Health in Edina, MN, residents have everything they need for a comfortable and fulfilling lifestyle in an assisted living setting. The community's commitment to providing exceptional care services paired with an array of amenities ensures that residents feel supported and engaged every day.
Revo Health is located at 4100 Minnesota Drive Unit 300, Edina, MN 55435 in Hennepin County, Minnesota
York Gardens Senior Living
Edina, MN
Home-like environment with friendly staff, clean facilities, and engaging activities.
York Gardens Senior Living costs
York Gardens Senior Living reviews
York Gardens Senior Living images
Walker Methodist Care Suites
Edina, MN
Attentive staff providing personalized care in a warm, pod-based community with engaging activities and good dining.
Walker Methodist Care Suites costs
Walker Methodist Care Suites reviews
Walker Methodist Care Suites images
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living
The article examines senior housing options, detailing the distinctions between independent living and assisted living, along with the emerging "independent assisted living" model that blends both approaches. It highlights the importance of assessing individual needs, preferences, and financial factors in making informed decisions about suitable living arrangements for seniors.
The deductibility of assisted living expenses on taxes hinges on factors like the individual's medical condition and service nature, typically requiring the resident to be "chronically ill" per IRS definitions. Taxpayers may deduct eligible medical expenses related to personal care services but generally not rent unless primarily for medical care, and they should maintain thorough documentation to support claims while considering itemizing versus standard deductions.
Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
The guide highlights the importance of assisted living facilities for aging veterans needing daily support, discusses unique challenges they face, and outlines available financial assistance from the VA, including the Aid and Attendance program. It emphasizes understanding eligibility criteria and navigating the VA system to access necessary benefits effectively.