3149 Columbus Avenue S., Minneapolis, MN 55407
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
A wide mix of experiences emerges from these accounts, painting a portrait of a service that inspires strong loyalties in some and deep dissatisfaction in others. On the one hand, there are voices that speak warmly of long relationships and positive feelings toward specific people. On the other hand, there are sharply critical voices that describe fear, neglect, financial tensions, and unprofessional behavior. Taken together, the collection reveals a landscape where personal experience can swing between comfort and alarm, depending on who you are, when you use the service, and which staff members you encounter.
Several reviewers recount emotional distress and a sense of being left without the care or security they needed. One person describes being scared of not being cared for, with only a little time available and the sense that compatibility with the service was never properly fixed. They vividly describe crying for their mother because daytime and nighttime fears felt overwhelming, and they ultimately avoided living there because the fear felt too real to overcome. The sentiment is not simply about a moment of frustration; it's framed as a fundamental mismatch between the recipient's needs and the support provided, leaving them with a painful impression that a few days of respite would not be enough to right the course. In this narrative, the emotional safety of staying is overshadowed by persistent worry, and the person expresses sorrow that their experience could not outgrow the need for their mother's presence.
Within this same thread, there's a restraint in evaluating the staff and the owner directly, at least from one viewpoint. The reviewer notes that they did not observe enough about the staff's conduct to form a judgment, and they explicitly say they cannot rate the staff or the owner. Yet the sentiment underlying that stance is not a blanket endorsement of the organization; rather, it is a cautious acknowledgment that their own experience did not allow for a fair assessment of the people involved. Even as they wish only the best for the company and hope improvements can be made, the difficulty of the experience remains palpable, suggesting that the service's impact on clients can hinge more on specific interactions than on the organization as a whole.
Other parts of the collection skew sharply negative, focusing on problems with leadership, payment practices, and communication. One reviewer characterizes the owner as a persistent problem, accusing him of failing to pay people, with more than one person claiming they did not receive overtime. The accusation extends to the claim that the owner is often out of the country, and there's a provocative charge that overtime wages were not paid to both the reviewer and their spouse. The same voice even alleges that the owner called the reviewer's wife to ask her to remove negative ratings, which amplifies the sense of pressure and intimidation surrounding complaints. These claims, if true, point to structural issues around wage practices, accountability, and professional boundaries in the relationship between staff, clients, and leadership.
Amid the negative charges, there are also explicit critiques that underscore a broader pattern of unreliability and poor management. One account labels the overall operation as having a "horrible work ethic" and "unprofessional management," while another emphasizes "horrible service" with unreliable personal care attendants and even theft. The speaker notes a lack of follow-up from both the owner and the office staff, and they frankly state they would rate the service below one star if it were possible. The thread here is not just about isolated incidents but about a recurring sense that promises of care and accountability do not translate into dependable, transparent practices. The absence of follow-up and the perception of theft create a climate of distrust that cast a long shadow over any potential positive experiences.
Yet within these critical voices there are also counterpoints that remind readers that not everyone's experience is the same. A separate review sings praise, describing a long-term positive relationship with the company - four years - where the environment is described as good and a staff member named Zack is highlighted as wonderful. This positive note stands in stark contrast to the criticisms about unpaid wages or unresponsive leadership, underscoring how divergent experiences can exist even within the same organization. The juxtaposition of "Love them" and "Horrible service" within the same broader set of reviews suggests that quality may be highly variable, influenced by time, place, and the individuals delivering the service.
Taken together, these voices reveal a service with a complex and uneven reputation. There are clients who feel emotionally supported and connected to particular staff members, experiencing a stable and caring relationship over years. At the same time, other clients speak to fear, emotional distress, and a sense of being neglected or exploited, with accusations of unpaid wages, inconsistent attention, and insufficient accountability from leadership. The spectrum of experiences raises important questions about how care is organized, how staff are treated and compensated, and how effectively concerns and complaints are addressed. It also highlights the importance of concrete protections for both clients and employees, including reliable payroll practices, transparent communication, and consistent follow-up when concerns arise.
For anyone considering this service, the collection suggests a need for careful, individualized assessment. If you are drawn to the organization because of the people who are described as wonderful in some accounts, it could be worth asking detailed questions about caregiver assignments, continuity of staff, and the specific support available for emotional needs. If you are weighing concerns about pay, accountability, and follow-up, it would be prudent to seek explicit assurances in writing, request a clear escalation path for complaints, and verify references from current clients about both the care quality and the responsiveness of the leadership. The stories here indicate that the service can both care deeply for some and disappoint others - often depending on who arrives at your doorstep and what personal circumstances surround your search for help."
Mercy Link II in Minneapolis, MN is an assisted living community that provides a comfortable and welcoming environment for seniors. The community offers various amenities to ensure the well-being and convenience of its residents. Each apartment comes fully furnished with cable or satellite TV and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access. Residents can enjoy their meals in the dining room or choose to cook in their own kitchenette.
The community features beautiful outdoor spaces and gardens where residents can relax and take in the fresh air. Additionally, there is a small library for those who enjoy reading. Housekeeping services are provided to ensure that residents have a clean and tidy living space at all times.
Mercy Link II offers care services designed to support the needs of its residents. Trained staff members are available 24/7 to provide assistance with activities of daily living, such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. Medication management is also provided to ensure that residents take their medications correctly. A mental wellness program is offered to promote emotional well-being.
Dining at Mercy Link II caters to special dietary restrictions, allowing each resident to enjoy meals that meet their specific needs. The community also encourages socialization and engagement through resident-run activities and scheduled daily activities.
The location of Mercy Link II offers convenient access to various amenities in the surrounding area. There are multiple cafes, parks, pharmacies, restaurants, transportation options, places of worship, physicians' offices, and hospitals nearby. This ensures that residents can easily access the services they need or explore new places of interest.
Overall, Mercy Link II provides a comprehensive assisted living experience with various amenities and care services tailored to meet the individual needs of its residents while offering a convenient location within Minneapolis.
Mercy Link II is located at 3149 Columbus Avenue S., Minneapolis, MN 55407 in Hennepin County, Minnesota
1-0 Granny's Helpful Hands II
Minneapolis, MN
Strong amenities and care options with competitive studio pricing.
1-0 Granny's Helpful Hands II costs
1-0 Granny's Helpful Hands II reviews
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are fundamental tasks vital for an individual's independence, particularly in older adults over 85, and include functions like bathing and dressing; assessing ADLs alongside Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) helps determine the level of required assistance due to age-related health challenges. Tailored support plans, involving family and community resources, are essential for maintaining dignity and autonomy in assisted living environments.
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Family caregivers face emotional, legal, and practical challenges when elderly parents refuse assisted living, often due to fears of losing autonomy. Open conversations and professional assessments can help address these concerns while exploring alternatives and ensuring safety, potentially leading to legal guardianship if necessary.
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs
Luxury assisted living offers high-quality senior care in a resort-like environment that combines essential medical support, gourmet dining, and personalized services to enhance residents' independence and well-being. These upscale facilities emphasize holistic health and community-building through customized care plans and social activities, catering to the growing demand for enriched senior living experiences despite higher costs.