3149 Columbus Avenue S., Minneapolis, MN 55407
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Mercy Link II
Pros
They have stayed with the company for four years.- Zack is wonderful.
- The environment is great.
- The reviewer wishes the company the best of luck.
Cons
The reviewer felt this program was not for them and that care was lacking.- The reviewer was scared and avoided living there due to fear of not being cared for.
- The reviewer felt the experience failed to meet the need to be with their mom.
- The owner was described as a pain and accused of not paying staff or overtime.
- The owner was said to be frequently out of the country.
- The service was described as horrible, with theft and no follow-up from the owner and office staff.
Review
Mercy Link II in Minneapolis is best suited for families that can actively supervise care and prize a warm, home-like atmosphere over a pristine administrative track record. The reviews repeatedly show a community where genuine, personal connections can form, particularly with certain staff members who demonstrate loyalty and competence. For a resident who thrives on familiar faces and daily companionship and who has a capable advocate on site to coordinate care, Mercy Link II can deliver meaningful moments and a sense of belonging. The caveat is that the experience hinges on management stability and consistent staffing. Prospective families should enter with the expectation that frontline care may be excellent on some days and uneven on others, depending on who is on duty.
Those needing steady, fully accountable administration should consider alternatives. Several reviews flag governance weaknesses: an owner described as unprofessional, reports of unpaid overtime, and allegations of funds being mishandled, with even a disconnected phone line cited as a reliability issue. While a few residents praise the environment and a couple of caregivers, the pattern across reviews points to inconsistent follow-through, gaps in communication, and a lack of reliable day-to-day oversight. For seniors with complex medical needs or families requiring predictable billing and strong accountability, a more transparent operator with documented policies and steady leadership is typically a safer bet.
On the upside, Mercy Link II does convey a comfortable environment and personal warmth from staff who stay long enough to know residents well. The standout presence of some caregivers, like Zack, illustrates that when staff are engaged, residents can receive attentive, individualized care and steady companionship. This can translate into good quality of life for those who value relational care and can tolerate occasional administrative hiccups. Yet the gains from these relationships are limited if care consistency falters, if staffing becomes unreliable, or if follow-up on issues is routinely delayed. In practical terms, that gap between good personal care and weak overall management defines the core tension here.
Smart decision-making requires concrete assurances before committing. Prospects should request current staffing ratios across shifts, verify payroll practices, and seek a clear plan for preventing pay delays or disputes. Inquire how complaints are handled and what accountability looks like in practice, including who a family can contact after hours. The reviews suggest limited follow-up and variable access to leadership; witnessing a responsive, structured process in action would be essential before relocating a loved one. A tour should include conversations with multiple staff members and, if possible, with a supervisor or administrator to gauge consistency and tone.
Cost and location matter, but culture and governance matter more. Mercy Link II may work for families who can invest time to oversee daily routines, care plans, and financial matters and who value interpersonal warmth enough to accept some operational risk. For households unable to commit to vigilant supervision, or for residents who require reliable PCA care and a rock-solid commitment to ethical, transparent practices, this setting will likely fall short. The overall picture from the reviews is a repeated emphasis on management gaps, with only selective, credible care lives shining through when the right staff are present.
In the end, Mercy Link II is not universally suitable. It suits families ready to advocate on-site, monitor care, and press for timely responses, tolerating the possibility of inconsistent experiences in exchange for moments of genuine connection. For others prioritizing predictable service, transparent finances, and unwavering leadership, alternative communities with stronger governance and steadier staffing are the wiser choice. The decision should hinge on what balance of personal warmth and administrative reliability best serves the resident’s needs and risk tolerance.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (5 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs