Brookdale Shreveport Costs & Pricing
Brookdale Shreveport offers a range of accommodation options that reflect its distinct value within the local and state context. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $3,200 per month, which is competitively priced when compared to the average cost in Caddo Parish at $1,697 and the broader Louisiana state figure of $3,235. Meanwhile, the semi-private room option is listed at $3,450 per month - aligning with the local average in Caddo Parish but slightly below the state average of $3,598. This positioning indicates that while Brookdale Shreveport may be on the higher end for studios relative to county averages, it remains competitive overall when considering both county and state metrics.
| Floor plans | Brookdale Shreveport | Caddo Parish | Louisiana |
|---|
| Studio | $3,200 | $1,697 | $3,235 |
| Semi-Private | $3,450 | $3,450 | $3,598 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$125 / mo
The Blake at Bossier City
$3,325 to $4,875 / month
8.7 miles away
-
from +$475 / mo
Brookdale Bossier City
$3,675 to $5,665 / month
8.3 miles away
-
About the same
Montclair Park Assisted Living
$3,150 to $4,500 / month
2.3 miles away
-
About the same
The Terrace of Shreveport
$3,200 / month
2.2 miles away
Overall Review of Brookdale Shreveport
common
35 reviews mention this
Caring, responsive staff is a highlight
Residents and families repeatedly describe the staff and nurses as caring, responsive, and helpful.
A large number of reviews mention staff who feel attentive to residents’ needs, including nurses and caregivers who work to keep people comfortable and safe. Families also describe support during move-in and transitions, with help coordinating items like medication delivery and other logistics. A few reviews mention concerns, including communication and staffing changes, but many still frame the overall experience as supportive and kind.
common
18 reviews mention this
Home-like feel and cleanliness
Many reviews praise the facility’s clean, comfortable, home-like atmosphere.
Several residents and families describe the building as clean, spacious, and easy to navigate, with comfortable common areas and inviting outdoor spaces. Multiple reviews highlight a “home-like” atmosphere and the way residents interact in shared areas, rather than feeling isolated. At the same time, one reviewer strongly disagreed and used harsh language about resident interaction and overall experience, while another review specifically tied a concern to the studio-style setup not fitting their needs.
common
14 reviews mention this
Dining quality and meal options
Dining stands out in reviews, with praise for food quality and menus that offer choices.
Reviews frequently mention good food and a dining area residents enjoyed, including comments about meals being enjoyable and presented in a way that feels more like home cooking. Some reviewers also describe the ability to order beyond a set menu, and others note the community serves multiple meals daily. A few reviewers raised food-related concerns, including requests for more fruits and vegetables or complaints about food quality, showing dining experiences aren’t uniformly perfect.
common
16 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Residents are described as staying busy with frequent activities and live entertainment.
Many reviews point to a steady schedule of activities, including games, music, church-related events, and group outings or special events that bring residents and families together. Several reviewers mention calendars of activities and regular programming that helps residents socialize. A couple of reviews describe gaps, such as directed activities depending on whether the activities director is present, and one memory-care reviewer asked for more assistance managing residents, which may affect how activities play out.
differentiator
9 reviews mention this
Memory care support and structure
Memory care reviews describe a structured environment with cleanliness and room for personal items.
Families who toured or placed loved ones in memory care mention a clean setup and a layout that supports residents feeling comfortable with belongings from home. Some reviews also describe the importance of structure for wandering or change, while others say the transition went well after a hospitalization or recovery period. One memory-care-related review was critical, describing the experience as “depressing” and questioning the quality of care they expected.
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Pricing and billing feel complicated
Several reviews raise concerns about cost, extras, and billing clarity.
Some reviewers describe the community as expensive and note add-on charges for services, medications, or personal care, with frustration about how the charges were explained. Others mention billing communication issues and difficulty getting itemized details, including one review calling the billing process “horrible.” On the pricing side, listed pricing ranges also indicate that studio pricing runs notably above the county benchmark, while semi-private is closer to below-county pricing but still varies by type.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.