90 Retreat Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Retreat Costs & Pricing
The monthly cost for a private room at Retreat stands at $5,800, positioning it as a competitive option compared to the broader market in Hartford County and throughout Connecticut. Specifically, while Hartford County averages $6,492 for similar accommodations, Retreat offers a more affordable alternative that can save residents nearly $700 per month. Even when considering statewide averages, which are approximately $5,479, the pricing of Retreat reflects not only value but also an emphasis on quality care and comfortable living arrangements. This thoughtful pricing strategy may appeal to individuals seeking exceptional service without straining their budgets excessively.
| Floor plans | Retreat | Hartford County | Connecticut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $5,800 | $6,492 | $5,479 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Retreat
Pros
The retreat has been very good for her.
The nurses and staff were very helpful to her.
The staff was very responsible and everyone, both staff and residents, were friendly.
The administrative staff communicated well and worked efficiently through the admission process.
The environment was clean and nicely decorated, with many activities led by friendly coordinators.
It was very fortunate for her to be able to stay at the Retreat.
The Retreat was the best of the three assisted living communities.
Cons
The reviewer states that there are thieves at the facility.
The reviewer claims that half of their disabled veteran father's belongings were stolen while he was in the hospital.
The reviewer describes the place as nothing but a cesspool.
Review
The Retreat in Hartford, CT is best suited for seniors who want a warm, engaged assisted-living experience with readily available daily support and a strong emphasis on staff accessibility. It works well for residents who prize proactive nursing care, clear administrative communication, and a social, activity-rich environment. Families considering long tenures will find that many residents remain comfortably settled here for years, with the caveat that health can and does progress, sometimes necessitating a move to full-time skilled nursing down the line.
Those who should consider alternatives are those with immediate, high-acuity needs or substantial memory-care requirements. If a loved one will require around-the-clock skilled nursing from day one, or if 24/7 security of personal belongings is a top priority, it makes sense to compare options with dedicated memory care wings or higher-security environments. Another red flag would be a budget that demands higher value for fewer services; if cost-consciousness combined with a need for intensive rehab or post-acute care is the norm, other facilities may deliver a tighter fit.
On the upside, the primary strengths here are hard to ignore. Families consistently note that the staff, especially the nurses, are helpful, proactive, and principled in their approach to care. Administrative leadership is described as communicative and efficient, aiding a smooth admission process and ongoing coordination of services. The living environment is clean and thoughtfully decorated, contributing to a comfortable, welcoming atmosphere. Residents benefit from a robust menu of activities coordinated by personable staff, which supports social engagement and daily purpose, a critical factor for quality of life in assisted living.
Yet the community does carry a notable risk signal from a single, highly amplified negative report: a claim of theft that paints the facility in a harsh light. While one family’s account stands in stark contrast to the broadly favorable experiences, it cannot be dismissed. Prospective movers should insist on transparent discussions about safeguards: property storage options, accountability policies, incident-response procedures, and visibility around who has access to resident rooms and belongings. This kind of due diligence helps separate isolated lapses from systemic issues and clarifies expectations about security.
In weighing the positives against the negatives, the decisive takeaway is that the strongest evidence favors Retreat for families prioritizing dependable care coordination, staff reliability, and an active, sociable living environment. The predominant experiences describe a community where residents feel cared for, administrators communicate well, and daily life remains vibrant. The negative incident must be acknowledged and investigated through careful scrutiny of security practices, but it does not erase the consistent praise for attentive nurses, clean surroundings, and meaningful activities.
Bottom line: Retreat is a solid fit for older adults who are currently independent-to-moderately frail, desire hands-on support with daily living, and place a premium on a proactive staff and lively community. It is less suitable for those expecting immediate high-acuity nursing, or for families unwilling to scrutinize safeguards around belongings. With clear questions about security and a plan for potential future care escalation, Retreat stands out as a practical, experienced choice in Hartford’s assisted-living landscape.












Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide