Maple Grove at Crestview in Colorado Springs, CO

Senior living communities with a similar price nearby

• from -$600 / mo

  St. Padre Pio Assisted Living

  5 from 39 reviews

  $2,700 to $5,000 / month

  1.8 miles away
• from +$125 / mo

  Revel Province

  4.7 from 162 reviews

  $3,425 to $4,400 / month

  4.7 miles away
• from +$100 / mo

  Jackson Creek Senior Living

  4.7 from 136 reviews

  $3,400 to $4,175 / month

  15.4 miles away
• from -$205 / mo

  Melody Living of Colorado Springs Independent Living

  4.7 from 27 reviews

  $3,095 to $4,645 / month

  11.8 miles away
• from +$315 / mo

  Brookdale Monument Valley Park

  4.6 from 107 reviews

  $3,615 to $5,553 / month

  1.6 miles away

Pros

• The staff at Crestview provide a warm, happy, and safe environment for residents.
• They have made a positive difference in her senior years.
• The Care Director, Nancy Ruminaki, is amazing, knowledgeable, perceptive, and caring, and she hires good caregivers.
• Nancy takes time and attention to understand residents and arrange for what they need.
• Each house has a home-like environment where residents share meals and socialize.
• The caregiver who stays in the houses gets to know the residents in a way that isn’t possible at larger places.
• Crestview is a good place for a loved one needing assisted living.
• The community feels small, homey, and clean, and the care workers are very sweet.
• The staff are working hard to adjust and are worth their weight in gold.
• The reviewer has been very happy with Crestview and notes that they have taken very good care of their loved one.

Cons

• The owner, Rick, orders groceries for his tenants and is notorious among delivery drivers for never tipping, even on large deliveries, and complaining about incomplete orders.
• There's a reason he's having more and more difficulty getting his deliveries fulfilled.
• No tip, no trip, Rick.
• Crestview is not the place for anyone with real medical needs.
• Crestview is lacking in activities to keep residents mentally stimulated.
• One of Crestview's two nearby communities wouldn’t accept wheelchairs.
• The other community was unable to do a two-person assist.
• What Crestview told the family they would do and what they actually did were very different.
• The facility told the family that it couldn't deliver the care she needed and that she would need to be moved.

Review

Maple Grove at Crestview is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like assisted living option where caregivers know residents well and daily life centers around shared meals and a comfortable, neighborhood feel. This community fits seniors who value intimate, easily supervised care, personal attention from staff, and a living arrangement that feels less like a campus and more like a series of connected homes. It works best for someone who does not require aggressive nursing oversight every day but still needs reliable companionship, daily assistance, and someone who can pivot quickly to changing needs with the help of a proactive care director. For families prioritizing a strong social calendar, robust activities, and high-level medical management, other options should be on the radar.

Pros are substantial for this setting. The small, homey structure, the way residents live in individual bedrooms and gather at kitchens and living rooms, facilitates genuine relationships between residents and the caregiving team. Cleanliness stands out, and caregivers are described as sweet, with real warmth in how they interact with residents. The presence of a hands-on care director who takes time to understand each resident’s needs is a critical differentiator, often translating into better-tailored support and smoother problem-solving with families. That direct access to leadership, combined with the intimate team that remains on site, helps offset the inherent limitations of a smaller community by delivering steadier, more personalized care.

Yet, there are meaningful trade-offs. Several reviews point to limited activities and delayed implementation of a formal activities program; for some residents, this translates into boredom and reduced cognitive stimulation. Medical capabilities appear constrained for higher-need cases: insulin management, consistent monitoring, and certain types of assistive care may not be as reliable as families would want, and some residents have experienced gaps in supervision during staffing transitions. There are mentions of frequent staff shifts and the burden on caregivers who stay busy with a high workload, which can affect how quickly needs are met when new or escalating concerns arise. A couple of comments touch on management style and expectations around service delivery, signaling that perceived corporate or ownership behavior can color the resident experience.

The positives do offset the negatives in tangible ways for a specific profile. The care director’s involvement can bridge gaps between what families want and what the community can consistently provide, ensuring plans are created and adjusted in real time. The home-like layout, with residents sharing meals at a kitchen table and socializing together, supports emotional well-being and reduces isolation, an important offset when activities are not yet fully developed. For families whose priority is trust in a steady, caring staff, and who can tolerate a slower ramp-up on programming, Maple Grove offers a dependable anchor where residents are known by name and cared for with regularity.

However, those weighing alternatives should be honest about two critical lines of difference. First, residents needing frequent, structured activities or robust daily programming should look at communities specifically marketed for expansive enrichment and continuous engagement. Second, anyone with significant medical complexity, tight insulin regimens, oxygen management, mobility support requiring two-person lifts, or high nursing oversight, should compare options with stronger on-site medical capabilities and clearer service guarantees. The existence of comparable communities across the street, sometimes with different Acceptance policies (for wheelchairs) and assist levels, reinforces the point: Crestview’s closest competitors can offer more comprehensive medical or accessibility assurances, even if they lack Crestview’s intimate, homey vibe.

In the end, Maple Grove at Crestview delivers a practical, compassionate option for families prioritizing warmth, staff continuity, and personalized care in a small, manageable setting. The decision hinges on balancing the lure of a genuine, people-focused environment against the reality of slower activity development and more limited medical support. For seniors who are comfortable with modest programming and do not require intensive nursing oversight, this community can be a strong, trustworthy choice steeped in daily human connection. For those who cannot compromise on robust activity schedules, consistent medical management, or highly predictable staffing and supervision, a more expansive or medically equipped option should be pursued. A visit with the care director, Nancy Ruminaki, will illuminate how closely Crestview can meet the exact needs and what assurances can be put in place before any transition.