The Bungalows at Springdale Costs & Pricing
The Bungalows at Springdale offers competitive pricing for assisted living accommodations in comparison to both Washington County and the broader state of Arkansas. For a studio apartment, residents can expect a monthly cost of $3,400, which is notably higher than the county average of $3,011 and the state average of $2,863. The one-bedroom unit is priced at $3,800, aligning closely with Washington County's average of $3,510 but surpassing the state average of $3,322. Meanwhile, two-bedroom options at The Bungalows are available for $4,000 per month, which again exceeds both local and state averages - $3,770 and $3,490 respectively. Despite these higher costs, many may find value in the amenities and services offered by The Bungalows at Springdale that contribute to a supportive living environment.
| Floor plans | The Bungalows at Springdale | Washington County | Arkansas |
|---|
| Studio | $3,400 | $3,011 | $2,863 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,800 | $3,510 | $3,322 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,000 | $3,770 | $3,490 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$400 / mo
The Bungalows at Fayetteville
$3,800 to $4,500 / month
6.2 miles away
-
About the same
Village on the Park Rogers
$3,500 to $3,995 / month
8.3 miles away
-
About the same
Village on the Park Bentonville
$3,300 to $4,150 / month
11.0 miles away
-
from -$525 / mo
Innisfree Senior Living
$2,875 to $3,695 / month
11.0 miles away
-
from -$550 / mo
Azalea Commons of Springdale
$2,850 / month
5.9 miles away
Overall Review of The Bungalows at Springdale
common
32 reviews mention this
Staff care drives comfort
Residents and families consistently describe attentive, compassionate staff support.
Across many reviews, families describe feeling confident that residents are cared for day to day, with staff members checking in and communicating with family. Multiple residents are described as happy, safe, and well treated, and several reviews credit named leaders and caregivers with making transitions smoother. A smaller set of reviews say care and leadership need improvement, including communication and accountability concerns, and one review highlights a decline after management changes. Overall, the reviews most strongly center on the people providing care and how supported families feel.
common
10 reviews mention this
Facility stays clean and maintained
Reviews repeatedly mention a clean, well-kept environment.
Several families and visitors highlight cleanliness and maintenance, describing the facility as well kept and âvery clean.â Other reviews add details like an impeccably maintained building, modern cleanliness, or recent renovations that refreshed common areas and rooms. Even where reviews were critical, cleanliness and upkeep sometimes come up alongside other concerns. Taken together, the environment is a frequent positive in residentsâ day-to-day impressions.
common
10 reviews mention this
Dining quality is a mixed signal
Dining receives both praise and complaints in resident experiences.
Many reviews mention good meals, homemade-style cooking, and satisfaction with dining options, including soft dining and variety. A few reviews also specifically call out dining as below average or too salty, and one reviewer is very critical of food quality. Where the tone is positive, families often connect meals with resident enjoyment; where itâs negative, concerns are framed around quality and consistency. Reviews overall suggest dining is an area that can swing more than other topics.
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Pricing changes are a recurring concern
Pricing changes and nonrefundable fees come up as concerns for families.
Some families question costs, including a nonrefundable payment that they viewed as excessive for a short stay. Others describe annual increases and additional charges that they felt were not clearly disclosed, including meal-related add-ons. Even among more positive reviews, pricing increases are noted as part of the experience, with families weighing value against rising costs. Overall, the cost story includes both âgood valueâ comments and clear objections to how charges changed over time.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Medication and safety issues show up
Some reviews raise concerns about care follow-through and medication management.
A few reviews describe incidents where families felt they werenât notified promptly, including an ER visit after a fall and later concerns about what was recorded. Another review asks for improvements in medication management and suggests families stay closely involved. Separate critical reviews point to leadership and accountability issues, with concerns about how care is managed when problems arise. While other reviews are strongly positive about care, these reports specifically focus on safety and communication gaps.
common
2 reviews mention this
Location helps with day-to-day access
Some families pick the community for convenience and access.
Two reviews explicitly mention choosing the community based on location and point to it as a practical factor. This aligns with the availability of nearby medical and everyday destinations, which can matter for families handling transportation and appointments. Even so, location appears as a secondary reason compared with care and staff in the broader set of reviews.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.