Tulsa Christian Care Ctr

Pros

• The staff were friendly and good, though it was occasionally understaffed.
• Mostly a good experience, and the OT worker was rated a 10.
• The staff went above and beyond, making families feel comfortable about long?term care and were described as amazing.
• The experience was outstanding, with delicious food, attentive caregivers, and effective rehab.
• The staff were very friendly, the facility was clean, and a family member with dementia seemed to be doing better and enjoyed the food.
• Greg Davis, the new marketing director, is amazing, knowledgeable, and very helpful.

Cons

• The staff are consistently rude.
• The staff and administration are terrible.
• The food is not fit to eat.
• The health department should close this place permanently.
• The facility is understaffed, with sub-par, slow to respond, rude, and verbally abusive staff.
• The building has holes in the walls and a large ceiling hole, and the floors are in disrepair and dirty.
• Management is rude and evasive and refuses to provide patient census or staff numbers.
• A kitchen staff member behaved rudely and spoke inappropriately about feces.
• The facility is dirty, ghetto, and trashy, and some say it should close permanently.
• The staff appear to be more interested in flirting than in caring for residents.

Review

The collection of reviews presents a facility that elicits wildly mixed reactions, swinging between moments of warmth, competence, and genuine care, and episodes of frustration, neglect, and alarming conditions. Some families describe a memory-care ward that, while small, offered a sense of community and progress as residents adapted to new limitations. In particular, one brother moved into a memory ward after a transfer, and reviewers note that staff were friendly and there was improvement over time: remodeling had taken place, with ceramic tile, fresh paint, and even flowers planted in pots. For this family, the environment began as emotionally difficult but gradually felt more comfortable as staff built relationships with residents who were increasingly able to navigate their days.

Yet the same facility draws scathing condemnations from others. A number of reviews go beyond concerns about comfort and community, voicing fears for residents' safety and well-being. One commenter warns they would never leave a family member there and condemns the staff and administration as terrible. Food quality is repeatedly flagged as unacceptable, with at least one account explicitly stating that meals were not fit to eat and referencing health-department concerns and calls for closure. These stark statements reflect a belief that, for some residents, basic standards of care and safety are not being met, and they underscore a climate of distrust surrounding the operation as a whole.

Other reviews paint a picture of a facility plagued by under-staffing and inconsistent management. A highly critical post describes an environment where staff are slow to respond, and some are flagrantly rude or verbally abusive. The physical condition of the building is described in vivid terms: holes in walls, a ceiling with a large hole, insulation hanging down, old and dirty floors, and a facility that smells of neglect. Management is portrayed as evasive when questioned, with reviewers reporting refusals to provide patient census data or staffing numbers. A particular anecdote about a confrontation outside visitation with a kitchen staff member adds to the sense of an unsafe, unregulated environment for visitors and residents alike, even as the reviewer plans to bring the issue to management.

Amid these harsh voices, there are pockets of nuance and balance. Some reviewers acknowledge that care can be decent, and that personal experiences vary widely even within the same building. A reviewer who describes a mostly positive experience notes that, while patience is required with nurses and CNAs (as they are human), the care team can be effective, and even gives a nod to the rehabilitation staff in a favorable light. Another post highlights a transition into long-term care for a father, praising staff who went "above and beyond" and helped the family come to terms with the need for off-site care. This sentiment is tempered by the observation that the facility could benefit from updates, even as the staff themselves earned high marks from that family.

There are also accounts that are almost caricatures of contrast. One reviewer labels the place as "ghetto" and "trash," criticizing understaffing, appearance, and a focus on social interactions over patient needs. Another post uses similarly charged language, calling the facility dirty and uncaring and accusing staff of flirting rather than attending to residents' needs. These comments are sharply negative and evoke an atmosphere of neglect and disrespect that some fear is commonplace. On the other hand, another reviewer counters with a positive note about the same facility, praising the delicious food, attentive caregivers, and effective rehab services, suggesting that quality of care can be strong in the right circumstances and with dedicated staff.

The most personal narratives center on families seeking comfort and reassurance for loved ones. One account describes a mother with dementia who has spent months in a memory-care unit and whose family reports she seems to be doing better, with clean facilities and friendly staff during visits, and even weight gain through better nutrition. In another thread, a reviewer contrasts these lighter moments with the harsher realities, recounting a visitor's experience of rude behavior from a kitchen staff member and the sense that some staff prioritize personal tasks over resident care. These switches between hope and disappointment mirror the broader tension in the reviews: the care and atmosphere can be genuine and transformative, yet organizational problems - understaffing, maintenance issues, and inconsistent supervision - can quickly undermine trust.

Toward the end of the collection, one positive thread resurfaces through a note about leadership, describing the new marketing director as amazing, knowledgeable, and helpful. While such leadership remarks do not erase the substantive concerns raised by other reviewers, they provide a glimmer of what some families hope to see: a facility that acknowledges problems, communicates clearly, and fosters a culture of accountability and improvement. In this sense, the reviews together sketch not only a facility with significant challenges but also a potential path forward: to marry compassionate, attentive care with solid logistics, clean, updated surroundings, transparent management, and more consistent staffing.

Taken as a whole, the body of reviews reveals a facility capable of meaningful, positive impact on residents and families, but also a place where dissatisfaction, safety concerns, and structural shortcomings can dominate the narrative. The strongest messages emphasize the importance of reliable staffing, responsive and respectful communication, clean and well-maintained environments, and transparent operations. For families considering care for a loved one, the overarching takeaway is clear: experiences here are highly variable, and careful, in-person evaluation - plus probing questions about staffing levels, safety protocols, food quality, and maintenance plans - would be essential steps before choosing this facility. The stories remind us that care is as much about the people who show up each day as it is about the walls that surround them.

This part of Tulsa, Oklahoma offers a variety of amenities and services that cater to seniors. With several cafes, restaurants, pharmacies, places of worship, physicians' offices, parks, theaters, and hospitals within close proximity, residents have easy access to essential resources. The area boasts a range of dining options, from fast food chains to sit-down eateries, providing convenience and choice for meals. Additionally, there are multiple pharmacies and healthcare facilities nearby for any medical needs. Parks and theaters offer recreational opportunities for leisure activities, while various places of worship cater to spiritual needs. Overall, this part of Tulsa provides a well-rounded environment with necessary amenities for seniors looking to reside in the area.

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.7 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (1.8 miles)
• Tally's Good Food Cafe (2.5 miles)
• Starbucks (2.8 miles)
• Cha Bubble Tea (3.9 miles)
• Coffee House (4 miles)

Restaurants

• Coney I-Lander (0.7 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (0.9 miles)
• Fiesta Cozumel (1.3 miles)
• McDonald's (1.4 miles)
• Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (1.6 miles)
• Whataburger (1.6 miles)
• Braum's (1.7 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Southroads 20 (0.8 miles)

Pharmacies

• Qualitycare Pharmacy (0.8 miles)
• Reasor's Foods (0.9 miles)
• Walgreens (1.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.9 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.1 miles)

Places of Worship

• Islamic Society of Tulsa (1.2 miles)
• Christ United Methodist Church (1.8 miles)
• TU Masjid / Mosque (3.5 miles)
• Brookside Baptist Church (3.8 miles)

Physicians

• Ou Physicians (1.2 miles)
• Tulsa Endoscopy Center (1.9 miles)
• Ranch Acres Audiology (1.9 miles)
• Oklahoma Men's Clinic (2 miles)
• Family Care of Tulsa (2.2 miles)
• Warren Clinic-Springer Building (3 miles)
• Breast Specialists Of Saint Francis (3 miles)

Parks

• Terrace Park (1.3 miles)
• Florence Park (2.4 miles)
• Leake Park (3.8 miles)
• Riverparks (4.2 miles)
• Gathering Place (4.5 miles)

Hospitals

• St John Medical Center (3.6 miles)
• Health Design (3.6 miles)
• Hillcrest Specialty Hospital (4.1 miles)
• Hillcrest Medical Center Same Day Surgery (4.1 miles)
• Hillcrest Medical Center (4.1 miles)