1215 South 9Th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Andrew Residence
Pros
The care provided here is excellent, with staff really caring about the residents and it consistently shows.
It is described as a great place to live, with positive impressions despite some privacy concerns.
The health and mental health housing offers a wide array of programs and amenities, including a fitness room and personal trainer, music rooms and lessons, bus passes, and diverse programming.
Dieticians and cafeteria-style dining are available for all three meals, reflecting a strong commitment to resident well-being.
Cons
Rabin was not a good supervisor.
They weren't really happy living there.
There was mold and cold sandwiches.
The facility has taken half of every resident's paycheck.
Rooms are jail cell size and separated by hanging sheets.
Mail is not personal and is opened by staff.
Residents are limited to $97 a month after SSI.
It is embarrassing how residents have to go through motions to do anything.
The reviewer would rate the place one star.
Review
Andrew Residence in Minneapolis is best suited for seniors who want hands-on, attentive care paired with a broad slate of health, social and therapeutic programs, delivered by staff who consistently show up for residents. The community targets individuals who value a lively activity calendar, fitness options with a personal trainer, music rooms, arts programs, and mental health and recovery supports, along with practical services like bus passes and flexible scheduling. It also carries IRTS licensing and access to dieticians and three meals a day. For families seeking reassurance that caregiving remains the core focus, this community often delivers, even as the physical plant reflects an older, functional design.
Those who should consider alternatives are the ones who prize private, modernized living spaces and transparent, consistently administered finances. Review notes point to bedroom privacy that could be improved and to living spaces described as cramped, with small rooms and, in some cases, partitions that reduce seclusion. The buildingâs condition also shows age, carpets worn and common areas showing wear, which can be a poor fit for residents who expect contemporary amenities. Governance concerns surface in several accounts: ownership exercises centralized control, and requests for itemized billing or formal financial documents have met resistance. For couples seeking private suites or families prioritizing forthright financial terms and steady administrative oversight, exploring other options is wise.
The strongest positives center on care quality and program breadth. Staff are frequently praised for genuine concern and reliable caregiving, and the daily routines, health and mental health supports, and diverse programming create meaningful engagement for residents with varying needs. The facilityâs wellness offerings, fitness facilities, personal training, and a range of therapeutic services, help residents maintain a degree of independence while receiving necessary assistance. In addition, practical supports such as transportation, scheduling flexibility, and meal service with dietitian input contribute real, tangible benefits for those managing multiple health needs or who value structured activity as a core part of daily life.
But the living environment cannot be ignored. The reality of space inside matters for comfort and dignity. With 2- and 3-bedroom configurations described as limited in privacy and occasionally separated by makeshift dividers, residents who want quiet, home-like bedrooms may feel displaced. The physical plantâs age compounds those concerns: carpet wear and other signs of aging can degrade day-to-day comfort. While some residents appreciate the buildingâs art and the overall atmosphere, the mismatch between program strength and housing infrastructure may hinder overall satisfaction, especially for residents who expect a more current, private, and tranquil living environment.
Financial and governance questions require careful due diligence. Reports of residents experiencing deductions from earnings, a push for itemized bills, and governance concentrated in a single administrator raise red flags for families prioritizing financial clarity and accountability. Privacy around mail and other personal information is another area families will want to explore before moving in a loved one. Prospective residents should obtain a clear, written fee schedule, request sample bills, and confirm who handles accounting and resident-related decisions. A transparent, documented approach to billing and governance is essential to ensure comfort with moving forward.
In the end, Andrew Residence offers a credible, capable option for families who place a premium on caregiving quality, broad programming, and practical supports that promote ongoing engagement. It suits residents who can tolerate shared or compact living spaces and who can navigate a facility that, while strong in care, shows its age in both infrastructure and administrative clarity. Those who cannot compromise on privacy, modern amenities, or transparent governance should actively compare alternatives. The prudent path combines a structured visit with direct conversations with front-line staff and current residents, plus a careful review of contract terms, billing examples, and service plans to determine whether this community aligns with the residentâs priorities and the familyâs expectations.







Top Cars for Senior Drivers and Essential Safety Innovations
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care
Comprehensive Approaches for Arthritis: A Detailed Guide to Symptoms, Causes, and Care